Argumentative zoning information extraction from scientific text

Let me tell you, writing a thesis is not always a barrel of laughs—and strange things can happen, too. For example, at the height of my thesis paranoia, I had a re-current dream in which my cat Amy gave me detailed advice on how to restructure the thesis chapters, which was awfully nice of her. But I also had a lot of human help throughout this time, whether things were going fine or beserk. Most of all, I want to thank Marc Moens: I could not have had a better or more knowledgable supervisor. He always took time for me, however busy he might have been, reading chapters thoroughly in two days. He both had the calmness of mind to give me lots of freedom in research, and the right judgement to guide me away, tactfully but determinedly, from the occasional catastrophe or other waiting along the way. He was great fun to work with and also became a good friend. My work has profitted from the interdisciplinary, interactive and enlightened atmosphere at the Human Communication Centre and the Centre for Cognitive Science (which is now called something else). The Language Technology Group was a great place to work in, as my research was grounded in practical applications develope

Automatic summarising: factors and directions

This position paper suggests that progress with automatic summarising demands a better research methodology and a carefully focussed research strategy. In order to develop effective procedures it is necessary to identify and respond to the context factors, i.e. input, purpose, and output factors, that bear on summarising and its evaluation. The paper analyses and illustrates these factors and their implications for evaluation. It then argues that this analysis, together with the state of the art and the intrinsic difficulty of summarising, imply a nearer-term strategy concentrating on shallow, but not surface, text analysis and on indicative summarising. This is illustrated with current work, from which a potentially productive research programme can be developed

On the Promotion of the Social Web Intelligence

Given the ever-growing information generated through various online social outlets, analytical research on social media has intensified in the past few years from all walks of life. In particular, works on social Web intelligence foster and benefit from the wisdom of the crowds and attempt to derive actionable information from such data. In the form of collective intelligence, crowds gather together and contribute to solving problems that may be difficult or impossible to solve by individuals and single computers. In addition, the consumer insight revealed from social footprints can be leveraged to build powerful business intelligence tools, enabling efficient and effective decision-making processes. This dissertation is broadly concerned with the intelligence that can emerge from the social Web platforms. In particular, the two phenomena of social privacy and online persuasion are identified as the two pillars of the social Web intelligence, studying which is essential in the promotion and advancement of both collective and business intelligence. The first part of the dissertation is focused on the phenomenon of social privacy. This work is mainly motivated by the privacy dichotomy problem. Users often face difficulties specifying privacy policies that are consistent with their actual privacy concerns and attitudes. As such, before making use of social data, it is imperative to employ multiple safeguards beyond the current privacy settings of users. As a possible solution, we utilize user social footprints to detect their privacy preferences automatically. An unsupervised collaborative filtering approach is proposed to characterize the attributes of publicly available accounts that are intended to be private. Unlike the majority of earlier studies, a variety of social data types is taken into account, including the social context, the published content, as well as the profile attributes of users. Our approach can provide support in making an informed decision whether to exploit one\u27s publicly available data to draw intelligence. With the aim of gaining insight into the strategies behind online persuasion, the second part of the dissertation studies written comments in online deliberations. Specifically, we explore different dimensions of the language, the temporal aspects of the communication, as well as the attributes of the participating users to understand what makes people change their beliefs. In addition, we investigate the factors that are perceived to be the reasons behind persuasion by the users. We link our findings to traditional persuasion research, hoping to uncover when and how they apply to online persuasion. A set of rhetorical relations is known to be of importance in persuasive discourse. We further study the automatic identification and disambiguation of such rhetorical relations, aiming to take a step closer towards automatic analysis of online persuasion. Finally, a small proof of concept tool is presented, showing the value of our persuasion and rhetoric studies

NLP Driven Models for Automatically Generating Survey Articles for Scientific Topics.

This thesis presents new methods that use natural language processing (NLP) driven models for summarizing research in scientific fields. Given a topic query in the form of a text string, we present methods for finding research articles relevant to the topic as well as summarization algorithms that use lexical and discourse information present in the text of these articles to generate coherent and readable extractive summaries of past research on the topic. In addition to summarizing prior research, good survey articles should also forecast future trends. With this motivation, we present work on forecasting future impact of scientific publications using NLP driven features.PhDComputer Science and EngineeringUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studieshttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/113407/1/rahuljha_1.pd

Investigating Citation Linkage Between Research Articles

In recent years, there has been a dramatic increase in scientific publications across the globe. To help navigate this overabundance of information, methods have been devised to find papers with related content, but they are lacking in the ability to provide specific information that a researcher may need without having to read hundreds of linked papers. The search and browsing capabilities of online domain specific scientific repositories are limited to finding a paper citing other papers, but do not point to the specific text that is being cited. Providing this capability to the research community will be beneficial in terms of the time required to acquire the amount of background information they need to undertake their research. In this thesis, we present our effort to develop a citation linkage framework for finding those sentences in a cited article that are the focus of a citation in a citing paper. This undertaking has involved the construction of datasets and corpora that are required to build models for focused information extraction, text classification and information retrieval. As the first part of this thesis, two preprocessing steps that are deemed to assist with the citation linkage task are explored: method mention extraction and rhetorical categorization of scientific discourse. In the second part of this thesis, two methodologies for achieving the citation linkage goal are investigated. Firstly, regression techniques have been used to predict the degree of similarity between citation sentences and their equivalent target sentences with medium Pearson correlation score between predicted and expected values. The resulting learning models are then used to rank sentences in the cited paper based on their predicted scores. Secondly, search engine-like retrieval techniques have been used to rank sentences in the cited paper based on the words contained in the citation sentence. Our experiments show that it is possible to find the set of sentences that a citation refers to in a cited paper with reasonable performance. Possible applications of this work include: creation of better science paper repository navigation tools, development of scientific argumentation across research articles, and multi-document summarization of science articles

Proceedings of QG2010: The Third Workshop on Question Generation

These are the peer-reviewed proceedings of "QG2010, The Third Workshop on Question Generation". The workshop included a special track for "QGSTEC2010: The First Question Generation Shared Task and Evaluation Challenge". QG2010 was held as part of The Tenth International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS2010)

Automatic abstracting: a review and an empirical evaluation

The abstract is a fundamental tool in information retrieval. As condensed representations, they facilitate conservation of the increasingly precious search time and space of scholars, allowing them to manage more effectively an ever-growing deluge of documentation. Traditionally the product of human intellectual effort, attempts to automate the abstracting process began in 1958. Two identifiable automatic abstracting techniques emerged which reflect differing levels of ambition regarding simulation of the human abstracting process, namely sentence extraction and text summarisation. This research paradigm has recently diversified further, with a cross-fertilisation of methods. Commercial systems are beginning to appear, but automatic abstracting is still mainly confined to an experimental arena. The purpose of this study is firstly to chart the historical development and current state of both manual and automatic abstracting; and secondly, to devise and implement an empirical user-based evaluation to assess the adequacy of automatic abstracts derived from sentence extraction techniques according to a set of utility criteria. [Continues.