26,607 research outputs found
Looking Beyond Label Noise: Shifted Label Distribution Matters in Distantly Supervised Relation Extraction
In recent years there is a surge of interest in applying distant supervision
(DS) to automatically generate training data for relation extraction (RE). In
this paper, we study the problem what limits the performance of DS-trained
neural models, conduct thorough analyses, and identify a factor that can
influence the performance greatly, shifted label distribution. Specifically, we
found this problem commonly exists in real-world DS datasets, and without
special handing, typical DS-RE models cannot automatically adapt to this shift,
thus achieving deteriorated performance. To further validate our intuition, we
develop a simple yet effective adaptation method for DS-trained models, bias
adjustment, which updates models learned over the source domain (i.e., DS
training set) with a label distribution estimated on the target domain (i.e.,
test set). Experiments demonstrate that bias adjustment achieves consistent
performance gains on DS-trained models, especially on neural models, with an up
to 23% relative F1 improvement, which verifies our assumptions. Our code and
data can be found at
\url{https://github.com/INK-USC/shifted-label-distribution}.Comment: 13 pages: 10 pages paper, 3 pages appendix. Appears at EMNLP 201
Knowledge Base Population using Semantic Label Propagation
A crucial aspect of a knowledge base population system that extracts new
facts from text corpora, is the generation of training data for its relation
extractors. In this paper, we present a method that maximizes the effectiveness
of newly trained relation extractors at a minimal annotation cost. Manual
labeling can be significantly reduced by Distant Supervision, which is a method
to construct training data automatically by aligning a large text corpus with
an existing knowledge base of known facts. For example, all sentences
mentioning both 'Barack Obama' and 'US' may serve as positive training
instances for the relation born_in(subject,object). However, distant
supervision typically results in a highly noisy training set: many training
sentences do not really express the intended relation. We propose to combine
distant supervision with minimal manual supervision in a technique called
feature labeling, to eliminate noise from the large and noisy initial training
set, resulting in a significant increase of precision. We further improve on
this approach by introducing the Semantic Label Propagation method, which uses
the similarity between low-dimensional representations of candidate training
instances, to extend the training set in order to increase recall while
maintaining high precision. Our proposed strategy for generating training data
is studied and evaluated on an established test collection designed for
knowledge base population tasks. The experimental results show that the
Semantic Label Propagation strategy leads to substantial performance gains when
compared to existing approaches, while requiring an almost negligible manual
annotation effort.Comment: Submitted to Knowledge Based Systems, special issue on Knowledge
Bases for Natural Language Processin
Empirical Methodology for Crowdsourcing Ground Truth
The process of gathering ground truth data through human annotation is a
major bottleneck in the use of information extraction methods for populating
the Semantic Web. Crowdsourcing-based approaches are gaining popularity in the
attempt to solve the issues related to volume of data and lack of annotators.
Typically these practices use inter-annotator agreement as a measure of
quality. However, in many domains, such as event detection, there is ambiguity
in the data, as well as a multitude of perspectives of the information
examples. We present an empirically derived methodology for efficiently
gathering of ground truth data in a diverse set of use cases covering a variety
of domains and annotation tasks. Central to our approach is the use of
CrowdTruth metrics that capture inter-annotator disagreement. We show that
measuring disagreement is essential for acquiring a high quality ground truth.
We achieve this by comparing the quality of the data aggregated with CrowdTruth
metrics with majority vote, over a set of diverse crowdsourcing tasks: Medical
Relation Extraction, Twitter Event Identification, News Event Extraction and
Sound Interpretation. We also show that an increased number of crowd workers
leads to growth and stabilization in the quality of annotations, going against
the usual practice of employing a small number of annotators.Comment: in publication at the Semantic Web Journa
- …