41,675 research outputs found
Difficulties of Diagnosing Alzheimer's Disease: The Application of Clinical Decision Support Systems
Introduction: Alzheimer's disease is one of the most common causes of dementia, which gradually causes cognitive impairment. Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease is a complicated process performed through several tests and examinations. Design and development of Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) could be an appropriate approach for eliminating the existing difficulties of diagnosing Alzheimer's disease. Materials and Methods: This study reviews the current problems in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease with an approach to the application of CDSS. The study reviewed the articles published from 1990 to 2016. The articles were identified by searching electronic databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct. Considering the relevance of articles with the objectives of the study, 29 papers were selected. According to the performed investigations, various reasons cause difficulty in Alzheimer's diagnosis. Results: The complexity of diagnostic process and the similarity of Alzheimer's disease with other causes of dementia are the most important of them. The results of studies about the application of CDSSs on Alzheimer's disease diagnosis indicated that the implementation of these systems could help to eliminate the existing difficulties in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Conclusion: Developing CDSSs based on diagnostic guidelines could be regarded as one of the possible approaches towards early and accurate diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Applying of computer-interpretable guideline (CIG) models such as GLIF, PROforma, Asbru, and EON can help to design CDSS with the capability of minimizing the burden of diagnostic problems with Alzheimer's disease
Recommended from our members
Towards Identifying and closing Gaps in Assurance of autonomous Road vehicleS - a collection of Technical Notes Part 2
This report provides an introduction and overview of the Technical Topic Notes (TTNs) produced in the Towards Identifying and closing Gaps in Assurance of autonomous Road vehicleS (Tigars) project. These notes aim to support the development and evaluation of autonomous vehicles. Part 1 addresses: Assurance-overview and issues, Resilience and Safety Requirements, Open Systems Perspective and Formal Verification and Static Analysis of ML Systems. This report is Part 2 and discusses: Simulation and Dynamic Testing, Defence in Depth and Diversity, Security-Informed Safety Analysis, Standards and Guidelines
Analyzing recommender systems for health promotion using a multidisciplinary taxonomy: A scoping review
Background: Recommender systems are information retrieval systems that provide users with relevant items
(e.g., through messages). Despite their extensive use in the e-commerce and leisure domains, their application in
healthcare is still in its infancy. These systems may be used to create tailored health interventions, thus reducing
the cost of healthcare and fostering a healthier lifestyle in the population.
Objective: This paper identifies, categorizes, and analyzes the existing knowledge in terms of the literature
published over the past 10 years on the use of health recommender systems for patient interventions. The aim of
this study is to understand the scientific evidence generated about health recommender systems, to identify any
gaps in this field to achieve the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 3 (SDG3) (namely, “Ensure healthy
lives and promote well-being for all at all ages”), and to suggest possible reasons for these gaps as well as to
propose some solutions.
Methods: We conducted a scoping review, which consisted of a keyword search of the literature related to health
recommender systems for patients in the following databases: ScienceDirect, PsycInfo, Association for Computing
Machinery, IEEExplore, and Pubmed. Further, we limited our search to consider only English-lan-guage journal
articles published in the last 10 years. The reviewing process comprised three researchers who filtered the results
simultaneously. The quantitative synthesis was conducted in parallel by two researchers, who classified each
paper in terms of four aspects—the domain, the methodological and procedural aspects, the health promotion
theoretical factors and behavior change theories, and the technical aspects—using a new multidisciplinary
taxonomy.
Results: Nineteen papers met the inclusion criteria and were included in the data analysis, for which thirty-three
features were assessed. The nine features associated with the health promotion theoretical factors and behavior
change theories were not observed in any of the selected studies, did not use principles of tailoring, and did not
assess (cost)-effectiveness.
Discussion: Health recommender systems may be further improved by using relevant behavior change strategies
and by implementing essential characteristics of tailored interventions. In addition, many of the features required
to assess each of the domain aspects, the methodological and procedural aspects, and technical aspects
were not reported in the studies.
Conclusions: The studies analyzed presented few evidence in support of the positive effects of using health recommender
systems in terms of cost-effectiveness and patient health outcomes. This is why future studies should
ensure that all the proposed features are covered in our multidisciplinary taxonomy, including integration with
electronic health records and the incorporation of health promotion theoretical factors and behavior change
theories. This will render those studies more useful for policymakers since they will cover all aspects needed to
determine their impact toward meeting SDG3.European Union's Horizon 2020 No 68112
Building a semantically annotated corpus of clinical texts
In this paper, we describe the construction of a semantically annotated corpus of clinical texts for use in the development and evaluation of systems for automatically extracting clinically significant information from the textual component of patient records. The paper details the sampling of textual material from a collection of 20,000 cancer patient records, the development of a semantic annotation scheme, the annotation methodology, the distribution of annotations in the final corpus, and the use of the corpus for development of an adaptive information extraction system. The resulting corpus is the most richly semantically annotated resource for clinical text processing built to date, whose value has been demonstrated through its use in developing an effective information extraction system. The detailed presentation of our corpus construction and annotation methodology will be of value to others seeking to build high-quality semantically annotated corpora in biomedical domains
The Adoption and Effectiveness of Automation in Health Evidence Synthesis
Background: Health systems worldwide are often informed by evidence-based guidelines which in turn rely heavily on systematic reviews. Systematic reviews are currently hindered by the increasing volume of new research and by its variable quality. Automation has potential to alleviate this problem but is not widely used in health evidence synthesis. This thesis sought to address the following: why is automation adopted (or not), and what effects does it have when it is put into use? / Methods: Roger’s Diffusion of Innovations theory, as a well-established and widely used framework, informed the study design and analysis. Adoption barriers and facilitators were explored through a thematic analysis of guideline developers’ opinions towards automation, and by mapping the adoption journey of a machine learning (ML) tool among Cochrane Information Specialists (CISs). A randomised trial of ML assistance in Risk of Bias (RoB) assessments and a cost-effectiveness analysis of a semi-automated workflow in the maintenance of a living evidence map each evaluated the effects of automation in practice. / Results: Adoption decisions are most strongly informed by the professional cultural expectations of health evidence synthesis. The stringent expectations of systematic reviewers and their users must be met before any other characteristic of an automation technology is considered by potential adopters. Ease-of-use increases in importance as a tool becomes more diffused across a population. Results of the randomised trial showed that ML-assisted RoB assessments were non-inferior to assessments completed entirely by human researcher effort. The cost-effectiveness analysis showed that a semi-automated workflow identified more relevant studies than the manual workflow and was less costly. / Conclusions: Automation can have substantial benefits when integrated into health evidence workflows. Wider adoption of automation tools will be facilitated by ensuring they are aligned with professional values of the field and limited in technical complexity
- …