11,362 research outputs found
Automated verification of model transformations based on visual contracts
The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10515-012-0102-yModel-Driven Engineering promotes the use of models to conduct the different phases of the software development. In this way, models are transformed between different languages and notations until code is generated for the final application. Hence, the construction of correct Model-to-Model (M2M) transformations becomes a crucial aspect in this approach.
Even though many languages and tools have been proposed to build and execute M2M transformations, there is scarce support to specify correctness requirements for such transformations in an implementation-independent way, i.e., irrespective of the actual transformation language used.
In this paper we fill this gap by proposing a declarative language for the specification of visual contracts, enabling the verification of transformations defined with any transformation language. The verification is performed by compiling the contracts into QVT to detect disconformities of transformation results with respect to the contracts. As a proof of concept, we also report on a graphical modeling environment for the specification of contracts, and on its use for the verification of transformations in several case studies.This work has been funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) under grant P21374-N13,
the Spanish Ministry of Science under grants TIN2008-02081 and TIN2011-24139, and the
R&D programme of the Madrid Region under project S2009/TIC-1650
Specification Patterns for Robotic Missions
Mobile and general-purpose robots increasingly support our everyday life,
requiring dependable robotics control software. Creating such software mainly
amounts to implementing their complex behaviors known as missions. Recognizing
the need, a large number of domain-specific specification languages has been
proposed. These, in addition to traditional logical languages, allow the use of
formally specified missions for synthesis, verification, simulation, or guiding
the implementation. For instance, the logical language LTL is commonly used by
experts to specify missions, as an input for planners, which synthesize the
behavior a robot should have. Unfortunately, domain-specific languages are
usually tied to specific robot models, while logical languages such as LTL are
difficult to use by non-experts. We present a catalog of 22 mission
specification patterns for mobile robots, together with tooling for
instantiating, composing, and compiling the patterns to create mission
specifications. The patterns provide solutions for recurrent specification
problems, each of which detailing the usage intent, known uses, relationships
to other patterns, and---most importantly---a template mission specification in
temporal logic. Our tooling produces specifications expressed in the LTL and
CTL temporal logics to be used by planners, simulators, or model checkers. The
patterns originate from 245 realistic textual mission requirements extracted
from the robotics literature, and they are evaluated upon a total of 441
real-world mission requirements and 1251 mission specifications. Five of these
reflect scenarios we defined with two well-known industrial partners developing
human-size robots. We validated our patterns' correctness with simulators and
two real robots
Formal Verification of Security Protocol Implementations: A Survey
Automated formal verification of security protocols has been mostly focused on analyzing high-level abstract models which, however, are significantly different from real protocol implementations written in programming languages. Recently, some researchers have started investigating techniques that bring automated formal proofs closer to real implementations. This paper surveys these attempts, focusing on approaches that target the application code that implements protocol logic, rather than the libraries that implement cryptography. According to these approaches, libraries are assumed to correctly implement some models. The aim is to derive formal proofs that, under this assumption, give assurance about the application code that implements the protocol logic. The two main approaches of model extraction and code generation are presented, along with the main techniques adopted for each approac
Tortoise: Interactive System Configuration Repair
System configuration languages provide powerful abstractions that simplify
managing large-scale, networked systems. Thousands of organizations now use
configuration languages, such as Puppet. However, specifications written in
configuration languages can have bugs and the shell remains the simplest way to
debug a misconfigured system. Unfortunately, it is unsafe to use the shell to
fix problems when a system configuration language is in use: a fix applied from
the shell may cause the system to drift from the state specified by the
configuration language. Thus, despite their advantages, configuration languages
force system administrators to give up the simplicity and familiarity of the
shell.
This paper presents a synthesis-based technique that allows administrators to
use configuration languages and the shell in harmony. Administrators can fix
errors using the shell and the technique automatically repairs the higher-level
specification written in the configuration language. The approach (1) produces
repairs that are consistent with the fix made using the shell; (2) produces
repairs that are maintainable by minimizing edits made to the original
specification; (3) ranks and presents multiple repairs when relevant; and (4)
supports all shells the administrator may wish to use. We implement our
technique for Puppet, a widely used system configuration language, and evaluate
it on a suite of benchmarks under 42 repair scenarios. The top-ranked repair is
selected by humans 76% of the time and the human-equivalent repair is ranked
1.31 on average.Comment: Published version in proceedings of IEEE/ACM International Conference
on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) 201
The ModelCC Model-Driven Parser Generator
Syntax-directed translation tools require the specification of a language by
means of a formal grammar. This grammar must conform to the specific
requirements of the parser generator to be used. This grammar is then annotated
with semantic actions for the resulting system to perform its desired function.
In this paper, we introduce ModelCC, a model-based parser generator that
decouples language specification from language processing, avoiding some of the
problems caused by grammar-driven parser generators. ModelCC receives a
conceptual model as input, along with constraints that annotate it. It is then
able to create a parser for the desired textual syntax and the generated parser
fully automates the instantiation of the language conceptual model. ModelCC
also includes a reference resolution mechanism so that ModelCC is able to
instantiate abstract syntax graphs, rather than mere abstract syntax trees.Comment: In Proceedings PROLE 2014, arXiv:1501.0169
- …