8 research outputs found
Estonian: typological studies. III
Kopeerimine ja printimine lubatudhttp://tartu.ester.ee/record=b1614208~S1*es
Educating Semiosis: Exploring ecological meaning through pedagogy
This thesis consists of six essays – framed by introduction and conclusion chapters – that develop possibilities for philosophy of education and pedagogy from the lens of bio-semiotics and edu-semiotics (biological and educational semiotics). These transdisciplinary inquiries have found commonality in the concept of learning-as-semiosis, or meaning-making across nature/culture bifurcations. Here, quite distinct branches of research intersect with the American scientist-philosopher Charles Sanders Peirce’s (1839 - 1914) pragmatic semiotics. I argue in these essays that the research pathway suggested by the convergence of edu- and bio-semiotics, reveals possibilities for developing a (non-reductive) theory of learning (and pedagogy generally) that puts meaning-making processes in a central light. A fully semiotic theory of learning implores us to take an ecological and biological view of educational processes. These processes explore the complementarity of organism-environment relations and the relationship between learning and biological adaptation. They also unravel new implications for education through the basic recognition that meaning is implicitly ecological. Understanding semiotic philosophy as an educational foundation allows us to take a broader and less dichotomized view of educational dynamics, such as: learning and teaching, curriculum design, arts and music education, inter/trans-disciplinary education, literacy (including environmental and digital literacy), as well as exploring the relationships and continuities between indigenous/place-based and formal pedagogical processes and practices. From this meaning-based and ecological perspective, what is important in the educational encounter is not psychologic explanations of learning stages, predetermined competencies, or top-down implemented learning-outcomes, but rather meaning and significance and how this changes through time-space and with others (not only human others) in a dynamic and changing environment. As addressed more directly in the conclusion chapter, these essays unravel the implications of this emerging approach to the philosophy of education, pedagogy and learning theory, specifically by providing conceptual/philosophical possibilities for integrating arts education, science education, and indigenous place-based knowledge into holistic educational approaches and programs
Minimalist sculpture: the consequences of artifice
This study, "Minimalist Sculpture: The Consequences of Artifice", was
initially prompted by the wish to examine the case for a materialist approach
to modern sculpture. Such an inquiry needed to address not only the
substantiality of material and its process, but also the formative role of
ideology on those choices of governing materials and procedures.
The crux of this study began as, and remains, an inquiry into physical
presence, and, by extension, the idea that Minimalist sculpture somehow
returns the viewer to the viewer. At the core of any materialist position is the
certainty that experience contains an element of passivity. If nothing exists
but matter and its movements and modifications, then consciousness and
volition depend entirely on material agency. The hierarchy of such a scheme
underpins the socio-economic and cultural level with that of the biological,
and, in turn, the biological with the physical. However, perception is not a
matter of automatically recording external stimuli, but requires active
elaboration. A hermeneutic process, therefore, is not one of unbridled pure
thought; rather, it requires the recognition of an external and constant
measure that gives form to thought. Recourse to the 'given' fact of an
external reference, therefore, depends upon a relationship between
materiality and signification-the resultant heuristic method of perceptual
hypothesis that is established remains perpetually open to questioning. C.S.
Peirce is invaluable to this study in providing a theoretical framework for these
considerations.
The manner in which modern sculpture was realized experienced a
decisive change with the emergence of Minimalism. The dominant aesthetic
of Vitalism was brought into question as never before by the materialist
programme set in motion by Minimalism. The key issue of adherence to a
Vitalist or Minimalist aesthetic is invaluable when clarifying the position of
artists such as Tony Smith and Robert Smithson.
Earlier sculptural forms generated by Constructivism utilized aspects of
industrial mimesis but did not engage with sheer physicality to the extent that
Minimalism did. One reason for this major difference was the consideration
accorded to scale rather than size by the Minimalists. Such a consideration of
scale and the experience of spatio-temporality, understood as inextricably part
of the sculptural situation, gave rise to site-specificity and its ramifications as
Minimalist concerns.
Approximately the first third of this study examines Vitalism as the
dominant and enduring theme and background for modern sculpture. Vitalism
formed an inherited intellectual situation that was directly challenged by the
materialism of the Minimalists.
In the second part of the study, Barnett Newman and Constantin
Brancusi provide the two central historical precedents for the re-introduction of
the precinctual into contemporary sculpture. Newman's interest in place as a
spatio-temporal experience, and his extension of the artwork to include the
interstice between the viewer and the artwork was an extremely important
step for Minimalism. Brancusi is of interest mainly for his addressing of
temporality as a sculptural concern, and the relationship of material to place.
11
His early use of assemblage, as a method of drawing with materials in space,
facilitated not only the Minimalists but also modern sculpture at large.
A section of the study is devoted to the sculpture of Richard Serra and
the idea of critical distance, something that he shares with Newman. This
intellectual attitude aids Serra in his declaration of the space of sculpture as
parallel to, and critical of, its context. The work of Robert Smithson is
examined in the light of site-specificity and ubiety, and, in particular, his use of
symbols as structural prompts. Smithson's dystopian Futurism is examined
as a significant way of helping to draw the distinction between his intellectual
position and that of a Vitalist.
The study concludes with a consideration of contextualization in general,
and of Maya Lin's site-specific memorial to the causalities of the Vietnam War.
What has emerged from this study is that precinctual space was firmly
re-established in contemporary sculptural practice by the Minimalist sculptors.
I have used the term ubiety to describe the re-emphasis, and re-emergent
awareness, of place as an interstitial space that was associated with the
Minimalists. Ubiety is understood to be the condition of being in a particular
place, and comes from the Latin 'where'. In contrast, ubiquity is the condition
of being everywhere. In the light of ubiety, sculpture, particularly site-specific
sculpture, is discussed and understood as a spatio-temporal event
Connecting Grammaticalisation
This monograph presents a view on grammaticalisation radically different from standard views centering around the cline of grammaticality. Grammar is seen as a complex sign system, and, as a consequence, grammatical change always comprises semantic change. What unites morphology, word order, constructional syntax and other grammatical subsystems is their paradigmatic organisation. The traditional concept of an inflexional paradigm is generalised as the structuring principle of grammar. Grammatical change involves paradigmatic restructuring, and in the process of grammatical change morphological, topological and constructional paradigms often connect to form complex paradigms. The book introduces the concept of connecting grammaticalisation to describe the formation, restructuring and dismantling of such complex paradigms. Drawing primarily on data from Germanic, Romance and Slavic languages, the book offers both a broad general discussion of theoretical issues and three case studies
Connecting Grammaticalisation
This monograph presents a view on grammaticalisation radically different from standard views centering around the cline of grammaticality. Grammar is seen as a complex sign system, and, as a consequence, grammatical change always comprises semantic change. What unites morphology, word order, constructional syntax and other grammatical subsystems is their paradigmatic organisation. The traditional concept of an inflexional paradigm is generalised as the structuring principle of grammar. Grammatical change involves paradigmatic restructuring, and in the process of grammatical change morphological, topological and constructional paradigms often connect to form complex paradigms. The book introduces the concept of connecting grammaticalisation to describe the formation, restructuring and dismantling of such complex paradigms. Drawing primarily on data from Germanic, Romance and Slavic languages, the book offers both a broad general discussion of theoretical issues and three case studies