3,389 research outputs found
Are beliefs a matter of taste? A case for Objective Imprecise Information
We argue, in the spirit of some of Jean-Yves Jaffray's work, that explicitly incorporating the information, however imprecise, available to the decision maker is relevant, feasible, and fruitful. In particular, we show that it can lead us to know whether the decision maker has wrong beliefs and whether it matters or not, that it makes it possible to better model and analyze how the decision maker takes into account new information, even when this information is not an event and finally that it is crucial when attempting to identify and measure the decision maker's attitude toward imprecise information.Decision under uncertainy;Objective Information;Belief Formation;Methodology of Decision Theory
Approximate Models and Robust Decisions
Decisions based partly or solely on predictions from probabilistic models may
be sensitive to model misspecification. Statisticians are taught from an early
stage that "all models are wrong", but little formal guidance exists on how to
assess the impact of model approximation on decision making, or how to proceed
when optimal actions appear sensitive to model fidelity. This article presents
an overview of recent developments across different disciplines to address
this. We review diagnostic techniques, including graphical approaches and
summary statistics, to help highlight decisions made through minimised expected
loss that are sensitive to model misspecification. We then consider formal
methods for decision making under model misspecification by quantifying
stability of optimal actions to perturbations to the model within a
neighbourhood of model space. This neighbourhood is defined in either one of
two ways. Firstly, in a strong sense via an information (Kullback-Leibler)
divergence around the approximating model. Or using a nonparametric model
extension, again centred at the approximating model, in order to `average out'
over possible misspecifications. This is presented in the context of recent
work in the robust control, macroeconomics and financial mathematics
literature. We adopt a Bayesian approach throughout although the methods are
agnostic to this position
Vaccine Risk Communication: Lessons from Risk Perception, Decision Making and Environmental Risk Communication Research
Dr. Bostrom reviews the rich variety of empirical findings available to guide risk communication and demonstrates how it can contribute to vaccine risk and safety communication
Are Beliefs a Matter of Taste ? A case for Objective Imprecise Information
We argue, in the spirit of some of Jean-Yves Jaffray's work, that explicitly incorporating the information, however imprecise, available to the decision marker is relevant, feasible and fruitful. In particular, we show that it can lead us to know whether the decision maker has wrong beliefs and whether it matters or not, that it makes it possible to better model and analyze how the decision maker takes into account new information, even when this information is not an event and finally that it is crucial when attempting to identify and measure the decision maker's attitude toward imprecise information.Beliefs, imprecision, information.
Dynamic planning of a two-dose vaccination campaign with uncertain supplies
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has led public health authorities to face the unprecedented challenge of planning a global vaccination campaign, which for most protocols entails the administration of two doses, separated by a bounded but flexible time interval. The partial immunity already offered by the first dose and the high levels of uncertainty in the vaccine supplies have been characteristic of most of the vaccination campaigns implemented worldwide and made the planning of such interventions extremely complex. Motivated by this compelling challenge, we propose a stochastic optimization framework for optimally scheduling a two-dose vaccination campaign in the presence of uncertain supplies, taking into account constraints on the interval between the two doses and on the capacity of the healthcare system. The proposed framework seeks to maximize the vaccination coverage, considering the different levels of immunization obtained with partial (one dose only) and complete vaccination (two doses). We cast the optimization problem as a convex second-order cone program, which can be efficiently solved through numerical techniques. We demonstrate the potential of our framework on a case study calibrated on the COVID-19 vaccination campaign in Italy. The proposed method shows good performance when unrolled in a sliding-horizon fashion, thereby offering a powerful tool to help public health authorities calibrate the vaccination campaign, pursuing a trade-off between efficacy and the risk associated with shortages in supply
Chance Constrained Mixed Integer Program: Bilinear and Linear Formulations, and Benders Decomposition
In this paper, we study chance constrained mixed integer program with
consideration of recourse decisions and their incurred cost, developed on a
finite discrete scenario set. Through studying a non-traditional bilinear mixed
integer formulation, we derive its linear counterparts and show that they could
be stronger than existing linear formulations. We also develop a variant of
Jensen's inequality that extends the one for stochastic program. To solve this
challenging problem, we present a variant of Benders decomposition method in
bilinear form, which actually provides an easy-to-use algorithm framework for
further improvements, along with a few enhancement strategies based on
structural properties or Jensen's inequality. Computational study shows that
the presented Benders decomposition method, jointly with appropriate
enhancement techniques, outperforms a commercial solver by an order of
magnitude on solving chance constrained program or detecting its infeasibility
- …