860 research outputs found

    Visual attention deficits in schizophrenia can arise from inhibitory dysfunction in thalamus or cortex

    Full text link
    Schizophrenia is associated with diverse cognitive deficits, including disorders of attention-related oculomotor behavior. At the structural level, schizophrenia is associated with abnormal inhibitory control in the circuit linking cortex and thalamus. We developed a spiking neural network model that demonstrates how dysfunctional inhibition can degrade attentive gaze control. Our model revealed that perturbations of two functionally distinct classes of cortical inhibitory neurons, or of the inhibitory thalamic reticular nucleus, disrupted processing vital for sustained attention to a stimulus, leading to distractibility. Because perturbation at each circuit node led to comparable but qualitatively distinct disruptions in attentive tracking or fixation, our findings support the search for new eye movement metrics that may index distinct underlying neural defects. Moreover, because the cortico-thalamic circuit is a common motif across sensory, association, and motor systems, the model and extensions can be broadly applied to study normal function and the neural bases of other cognitive deficits in schizophrenia.R01 MH057414 - NIMH NIH HHS; R01 MH101209 - NIMH NIH HHS; R01 NS024760 - NINDS NIH HHSPublished versio

    Analog VLSI-Based Modeling of the Primate Oculomotor System

    Get PDF
    One way to understand a neurobiological system is by building a simulacrum that replicates its behavior in real time using similar constraints. Analog very large-scale integrated (VLSI) electronic circuit technology provides such an enabling technology. We here describe a neuromorphic system that is part of a long-term effort to understand the primate oculomotor system. It requires both fast sensory processing and fast motor control to interact with the world. A one-dimensional hardware model of the primate eye has been built that simulates the physical dynamics of the biological system. It is driven by two different analog VLSI chips, one mimicking cortical visual processing for target selection and tracking and another modeling brain stem circuits that drive the eye muscles. Our oculomotor plant demonstrates both smooth pursuit movements, driven by a retinal velocity error signal, and saccadic eye movements, controlled by retinal position error, and can reproduce several behavioral, stimulation, lesion, and adaptation experiments performed on primates

    Investigating Cognitive Control And Task Switching Using The Macaque Oculomotor System

    Get PDF
    Cognitive control is crucial to voluntary behaviour. It is required to select appropriate goals and guide behaviour to achieve the desired outcomes. Cognitive control is particularly important for the ability to adapt behaviour to changes in the external environment and internal goals, and to quickly switch between different tasks. Successful task switching involves a network of brain areas to select, maintain, implement, and execute the appropriate task. Uncovering the neural mechanisms of this goal-directed behaviour using lesions, functional neuroimaging, and neurophysiology studies is central to cognitive neuroscience. The oculomotor system provides a valuable framework for understanding the neural mechanisms of cognitive control, as it is anatomically and functionally well characterized. In this project, pro-saccade and anti-saccade tasks were used to investigate the contributions of oculomotor and cognitive brain areas to different stages of task processing. In Chapter 2, non-human primates performed cued and randomly interleaved pro-saccade and anti-saccade tasks while neural activity was recorded in the superior colliculus (SC). In Chapter 3, non-human primates performed cued and randomly interleaved pro-saccade and anti-saccade tasks while local field potential activity was recorded in the SC and reversible cryogenic deactivation was applied to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). In Chapter 4, non-human primates performed uncued and cued pro-saccade and anti-saccade switch tasks while reversible cryogenic deactivation was applied to the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC). The first study clarifies that macaque monkeys demonstrate similar error rate and reaction time switch costs to humans performing cued and randomly interleaved pro-saccade and anti-saccade tasks. These switch costs were associated with switch-related differences in stimulus-related activity in the SC that were resolved by the time of saccade onset. The second study shows that bilateral DLPFC deactivation decreases preparatory beta and gamma power in the superior colliculus. In addition, the correlation of gamma power with spike rate in the SC was attenuated by DLPFC deactivation. Lastly, bilateral dACC deactivation in the third study impairs anti-saccade performance and increases saccadic reaction times for pro-saccades and anti-saccades. Deactivation of the dACC also impairs the ability to integrate feedback from the previous trial. Overall, these findings suggest unique roles for the dACC, DLPFC, and SC in cognitive control and task switching. The dACC may monitor feedback to select the appropriate task and implement cognitive control, the DLPFC may maintain the current task-set and modulate the activity of other brain areas, and the SC may be modulated by task switching processes and contribute to the production of switch costs

    Oculomotor learning revisited: a model of reinforcement learning in the basal ganglia incorporating an efference copy of motor actions

    Get PDF
    In its simplest formulation, reinforcement learning is based on the idea that if an action taken in a particular context is followed by a favorable outcome, then, in the same context, the tendency to produce that action should be strengthened, or reinforced. While reinforcement learning forms the basis of many current theories of basal ganglia (BG) function, these models do not incorporate distinct computational roles for signals that convey context, and those that convey what action an animal takes. Recent experiments in the songbird suggest that vocal-related BG circuitry receives two functionally distinct excitatory inputs. One input is from a cortical region that carries context information about the current โ€œtimeโ€ in the motor sequence. The other is an efference copy of motor commands from a separate cortical brain region that generates vocal variability during learning. Based on these findings, I propose here a general model of vertebrate BG function that combines context information with a distinct motor efference copy signal. The signals are integrated by a learning rule in which efference copy inputs gate the potentiation of context inputs (but not efference copy inputs) onto medium spiny neurons in response to a rewarded action. The hypothesis is described in terms of a circuit that implements the learning of visually guided saccades. The model makes testable predictions about the anatomical and functional properties of hypothesized context and efference copy inputs to the striatum from both thalamic and cortical sources

    ์†Œ๋‡Œ-์˜์กด์  ์šด๋™ ํ•™์Šต์— ์˜ํ•ด ์œ ๋„๋œ ์†Œ๋‡Œ ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ ๋ฐœํ˜„๊ณผ ํผํ‚จ์ง€ ์„ธํฌ ํฅ๋ถ„์„ฑ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์˜๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์˜๊ณผํ•™๊ณผ, 2021.8. ๊น€์ƒ์ •.์‹ ๊ฒฝ ๊ณผํ•™์—์„œ ๋‡Œ์˜ ๊ณ ๋“ฑ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ์ค‘์— ํ•˜๋‚˜์ธ ํ•™์Šต๊ณผ ๊ธฐ์–ต์ด ์–ด๋–ค ๋ถ„์ž ํ˜น์€ ์„ธํฌ ๊ธฐ์ „์— ์˜ํ•ด ๋งค๊ฐœ๋˜๋Š”๊ฐ€ ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ํฅ๋ฏธ๋กœ๋Š” ์ฃผ์ œ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜์  ์ ‘๊ทผ๋“ค ์ค‘์—์„œ ์•ผ์ƒํ˜• ๋™๋ฌผ์˜ ๋‡Œ์—์„œ ํ•™์Šต ์ดํ›„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๋Š” ํ”์ ์„ ์ถ”์ ํ•˜๋Š” ์ผ์€ ๊ทผ๋ณธ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋„๋ฆฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์–ด์˜ค๋Š” ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•์ด๋‹ค. ํ•™์œ„๊ณผ์ •๋™์•ˆ ๋‚˜๋Š” ์†Œ๋‡Œ-์˜์กด์  ์šด๋™ ๊ธฐ์–ต์ด ์†Œ๋‡Œ์˜ ๋ถ„์ž์  ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์„ธํฌ ์ˆ˜์ค€์—์„œ ๋‚จ๊ธฐ๋Š” ํ”์ ๋“ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํƒ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ € ์ œ1์žฅ์—์„œ๋Š” ์†Œ๋‡Œ-์˜์กด์  ํ•™์Šต์ด ์†Œ๋‡Œ์˜ ๋ถ„์ž์  ์ˆ˜์ค€์—์„œ ๋‚จ๊ธฐ๋Š” ํ”์ ์„ ์ฐพ๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์‹œ๋„๋ฅผ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์†Œ๋‡Œ๋Š” ์šด๋™์˜ ๊ฐ•๋„๋ฅผ ์ ์ ˆํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์กฐ์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ์šด๋™ ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š”๋ฐ, ๊ธฐ์กด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด ์šด๋™์˜ ๊ฐ•๋„๊ฐ€ ์กฐ์ ˆ๋˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ฐ๊ฐ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ข…๋ฅ˜์˜ ์„ธํฌ ๊ธฐ์ „์ด ์กด์žฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์ด ์ œ๊ธฐ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์–ต์˜ ํ˜•์„ฑ๊ณผ ์œ ์ง€์— ์žˆ์–ด์„œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ์˜ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ์ด ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ด๋ผ๋Š” ์‚ฌ์‹ค์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ, ๋‚˜๋Š” ์šด๋™์˜ ๊ฐ•๋„ ์กฐ์ ˆ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์˜ ์šด๋™ ํ•™์Šต์ด ์†Œ๋‡Œ์—์„œ์˜ ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ๊ตฐ์˜ ๋ฐœํ˜„์„ ์œ ๋„ํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ๋Š” ๊ฐ€์„ค์„ ์„ธ์› ๋‹ค. ๋‚˜๋Š” ์šด๋™์˜ ๊ฐ•๋„๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ•ํ•ด์ง€๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์•ฝํ•ด์ง€๋Š” ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ ์ผ์–ด๋‚˜๋Š” ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ 3 ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ข…๋ฅ˜์˜ ์†Œ๋‡Œ-์˜์กด์  ์•ˆ๊ตฌ ์šด๋™ ํ•™์Šต์„ ๊ฒช์€ ์ƒ์ฅ์—์„œ ํ•™์Šต์ด ๋๋‚œ ํ›„ 1 ์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ณผ 24 ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ์ง€๋‚œ ์†Œ๋‡Œ์—์„œ ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ ๋ฐœํ˜„ ์ˆ˜์ค€์„ ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์ฒด ํ”„๋กœํŒŒ์ผ๋ง์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ •๋Ÿ‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‹คํ—˜์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, 3 ๊ฐ€์ง€ ํ•™์Šต ํŒจ๋Ÿฌ๋‹ค์ž„ ํ•™์Šต ํ›„ 1 ์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ณผ 24 ์‹œ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ฐ ์†Œ๋‡Œ์—์„œ ์ด 43 ๊ฐœ์˜ ์ฐจ๋ฐœํ˜„ ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ์„ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ์˜จํ†จ๋กœ์ง€ ๋ถ„์„์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์•ˆ๊ตฌ ์šด๋™ ํ•™์Šต ํ›„ 24 ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ์ง€๋‚œ ์†Œ๋‡Œ์—์„œ ํ†ต์ œ๊ตฐ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๋ฐœํ˜„์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•œ ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ ๊ทธ๋ฃน์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋Š”๋ฐ, ์ด ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์•ˆ๊ตฌ ์šด๋™ ๊ธฐ์–ต์˜ ํ˜•์„ฑ์— ์žˆ์–ด์„œ ๋ณ„๊ฐœ์˜ ์ƒ๋ฌผํ•™์  ๊ฒฝ๋กœ๊ฐ€ ๊ด€์—ฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ€์ค‘ ์ƒ๊ด€ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ๋ถ„์„์„ ์‹ค์‹œํ•˜์—ฌ ์•ˆ๊ตฌ ์šด๋™ ๊ธฐ์–ต ํ•™์Šต๋Ÿ‰๊ณผ ์ƒ๊ด€ ๊ด€๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ ๊ทธ๋ฃน์„ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ, ์ด ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ ๊ทธ๋ฃน ์ค‘ 4 ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ(Snca, Sncb, Cttn ๋ฐ Stmn1)์„ ์„ ํƒํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์ฒด ํ”„๋กœํŒŒ์ผ๋ง์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์›จ์Šคํ„ด๋ธ”๋กฏ๋ถ„์„์œผ๋กœ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์†Œ๋‡Œ ์˜์กด์  ์šด๋™ ํ•™์Šต ํŒจ๋Ÿฌ๋‹ค์ž„๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ์ข…ํ•ฉ์ ์ธ ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ ๋ชฉ๋ก์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ, ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๊ฐ ํ•™์Šต ํŒจ๋Ÿฌ๋‹ค์ž„์ด ์†Œ๋‡Œ์—์„œ ์„œ๋กœ ๊ตฌ๋ณ„๋˜๋Š” ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ๊ตฐ์˜ ๋ฐœํ˜„์„ ์œ ๋„ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ œ2์žฅ์—์„œ๋Š” ์•ž์„œ ์–ธ๊ธ‰ํ•œ 3 ๊ฐ€์ง€ ํ•™์Šต ํŒจ๋Ÿฌ๋‹ค์ž„ ์ค‘์—์„œ ์‹œ์šด๋™ ๋ฐ˜์‘ ์ ์‘ ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ด๋‹ค. ์‹œ์šด๋™ ๋ฐ˜์‘์€ ์‹œ์•ผ์˜ ์›€์ง์ž„์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋ฉด ์ด๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ข…ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ์  ์•ˆ๊ตฌ ์šด๋™์œผ๋กœ ๋ง๋ง‰์— ์•ˆ์ •๋œ ๋ฌผ์ฒด์˜ ์ƒ์ด ๋งบํž ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ๋•๋Š” ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์‹œ์šด๋™ ๋ฐ˜์‘์€ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ทธ ๋ฐ˜์‘์˜ ์ •๋„๊ฐ€ ์กฐ์ ˆ๋˜๋Š” ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋Š”๋ฐ, ์ด๋Ÿฐ ์ ์‘ ๊ณผ์ •์— ์†Œ๋‡Œ๊ฐ€ ๊ด€์—ฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ์†Œ๋‡Œ์— ์กด์žฌํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ์„ธํฌ๋“ค ์ค‘, ํผํ‚จ์ง€ ์„ธํฌ๋Š” ์†Œ๋‡Œ ํ”ผ์งˆ๋กœ ์ „๋‹ฌ๋œ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ฐ๊ฐ ์ •๋ณด๋“ค์„ ํ†ตํ•ฉํ•˜๊ณ  ์†Œ๋‡Œ์˜ ์œ ์ผํ•œ ์ถœ๋ ฅ์„ ๋‹ด๋‹นํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์žˆ๋Š”๋ฐ, ์ด์™€ ๊ฐ™์ด ์‹œ์šด๋™ ๋ฐ˜์‘์„ ํ†ต์ œํ•˜๋Š” ์‹ ๊ฒฝ ํšŒ๋กœ ์ƒ ํผํ‚จ์ง€ ์„ธํฌ์˜ ์ค‘์š”์„ฑ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹œ์šด๋™ ๋ฐ˜์‘ ์ ์‘ ํ•™์Šต ์ƒํ™ฉ์—์„œ ์†Œ๋‡Œ ํผํ‚จ์ง€ ์„ธํฌ์˜ ์ „๊ธฐ์ƒ๋ฆฌํ•™์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋ฐํžˆ๋ ค๋Š” ์‹œ๋„๋Š” ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ ๋ถ€์กฑํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์ด ์‚ฌ์‹ค์ด๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๋‚˜๋Š” ์‹œ์šด๋™ ์ ์‘ ํ•™์Šต ์ดํ›„ ์†Œ๋‡Œ ํผํ‚จ์ง€ ์„ธํฌ์—์„œ์˜ ๋‚ด์žฌ์  ๋ฐ ์Šค๋ƒ…์Šค ํฅ๋ถ„์„ฑ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๊ฐ€ ์œ ๋ฐœ๋˜๋Š”์ง€ ์—ฌ๋ถ€๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ†ต์ œ๊ตฐ๊ณผ 50๋ถ„์˜ ์‹œ์šด๋™ ํ•™์Šต์„ ๋งˆ์นœ ํ•™์Šต๊ตฐ์—์„œ ์†Œ๋‡Œ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ๊ฐ ์–ป์€ ํ›„ ํผํ‚จ์ง€ ์„ธํฌ์—์„œ ์ „๊ธฐ์ƒ๋ฆฌํ•™์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๋‚˜๋Š” ํ•™์Šต๊ตฐ์˜ ํผํ‚จ์ง€ ์„ธํฌ์—์„œ ํ†ต์ œ๊ตฐ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์„ธํฌ๋‚ด ํƒˆ๋ถ„๊ทน ์ „๋ฅ˜ ์ฃผ์ž…์— ๋ฐ˜์‘ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๋Š” ํ™œ๋™ ์ „์œ„์˜ ๋ฐœํ™”์œจ์ด ์ค„์–ด๋“ค๊ณ , ๋ ˆ์˜ค๋ฒ ์ด์Šค ์ „๋ฅ˜๊ฐ€ ์ปค์กŒ์Œ์„ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์‹œ์šด๋™ ์ ์‘ ํ•™์Šต์€ ์‹œ๋ƒ…์Šค ์ „ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ ์ „๋‹ฌ ๋ฌผ์งˆ ์†Œํฌ์˜ ๋ฐฉ์ถœ ํ™•๋ฅ ์„ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚ด์œผ๋กœ์จ ์†Œ๋‡Œ ํ‰ํ–‰์„ฌ์œ ์™€ ํผํ‚จ์ง€ ์„ธํฌ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ํฅ๋ถ„์„ฑ ์‹œ๋ƒ…์Šค ์ „๋‹ฌ์„ ์•ฝํ™”์‹œ์ผฐ๋‹ค. 2์žฅ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ข…ํ•ฉํ•˜๋ฉด, ์‹œ์šด๋™ ์ ์‘ ํ•™์Šต์€ ์†Œ๋‡Œ ํผํ‚จ์ง€ ์„ธํฌ์˜ ๋‚ด์žฌ์  ๋ฐ ์‹œ๋ƒ…์Šค ์ˆ˜์ค€ ๋ชจ๋‘์—์„œ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ ํฅ๋ถ„์„ฑ์˜ ์•ฝํ™”๋ฅผ ์œ ๋ฐœํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์†Œ๋‡Œ-์˜์กด์  ์•ˆ๊ตฌ ์šด๋™ ํ•™์Šต์„ ๋งค๊ฐœํ•˜๋Š” ๋‹ค์ค‘ ๊ฐ€์†Œ์„ฑ์˜ ์กด์žฌ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ ๋‚˜๋Š” ์†Œ๋‡Œ-์˜์กด์  ์šด๋™ ๊ธฐ์–ต์ด ์†Œ๋‡Œ์˜ ๋ถ„์ž ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์„ธํฌ ์ˆ˜์ค€์—์„œ ๋‚จ๊ธฐ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์–ต ํ”์ ์„ ์ฐพ๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€์˜ ๊ด€์ฐฐ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํƒ๊ตฌ์™€ ๋ถ„์„์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ฐพ์€ ํ›„๋ณด ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ๊ณผ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ ๊ฐ€์†Œ์„ฑ์€ ์šด๋™ ๊ธฐ์–ต ํ˜•์„ฑ ๋ฐ ๊ณ ์ฐฉํ™” ๊ณผ์ •์— ์‹ค์ œ๋กœ ๊ด€์—ฌํ•˜๋Š”์ง€ ์—ฌ๋ถ€๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๋Š” ํ›„์† ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋กœ ์ด์–ด์ ธ ํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์ ์œผ๋กœ, ์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ์†Œ๋‡Œ-์˜์กด์  ์šด๋™ ๊ธฐ์–ต์„ ๋งค๊ฐœํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๊ธฐ์กด์— ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์žˆ์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๋ถ„์ž ๋˜๋Š” ์‹ ๊ฒฝ ๊ฐ€์†Œ์„ฑ์˜ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ์„ ์ด‰์ง„ํ•˜๋Š” ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์ž์›์ด ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค.One of the fundamental questions in neuroscience is how the brain encodes learning and memory processes at the molecular and cellular levels. Of the various approaches to resolve this question, it is useful to investigate the molecular or cellular traces that are formed in the brain after learning in wildtype animals. In this dissertation, I attempted to find traces of cerebellum-dependent motor memory at the molecular and cellular levels in the cerebellum. First, in chapter โ… , I attempted to find the trace of cerebellum-dependent motor memory at the molecular level of the cerebellum. The cerebellum improves motor performance by adjusting the motor strength appropriately. According to previous studies, it has been suggested that distinct cellular mechanisms may exist depending on the direction in which the motor strength is adjusted. Given that de novo protein synthesis is essential in the formation and retention of memory in the brain, I hypothesized that motor learning in the opposite direction would induce a distinct pattern of protein expression in the cerebellum. I conducted quantitative proteomic profiling to compare the level of protein expression in the cerebellum at 1 and 24 h after training from mice that underwent different paradigms of cerebellum-dependent oculomotor learning from specific directional changes in motor gain. I quantified a total of 43 proteins that were significantly regulated in each of the three learning paradigms in the cerebellum at 1 and 24 h after learning. In addition, functional enrichment analysis identified protein groups that were differentially enriched or depleted in the cerebellum at 24 h after the three oculomotor learnings, suggesting that distinct biological pathways may be engaged in the formation of three oculomotor memories. Weighted correlation network analysis discovered groups of proteins significantly correlated with oculomotor memory. Finally, four proteins (Snca, Sncb, Cttn, and Stmn1) from the protein group correlated with the learning amount after oculomotor training were validated by Western blot. This study provides a comprehensive and unbiased list of proteins related to three cerebellum-dependent motor learning paradigms, suggesting the distinct nature of protein expression in the cerebellum for each learning paradigm. In chapter โ…ก, I focused on the optokinetic response (OKR) learning among the three oculomotor paradigms mentioned above. The OKR is a reflexive eye movement evoked by a motion of the visual field to stabilize an image on the retina. The OKR is known to adapt its strength to cope with an environmental change throughout life. The cerebellum is well-known to participate in this oculomotor learning as an adaptive controller. In the adaptive controlling unit, the Purkinje cell (PC) is known to integrate multimodal sensory information in the cerebellar cortex as the sole output of the cerebellum. Despite the significance of PC in the neural circuit modulating OKR, the electrophysiological properties of PC in optokinetic learning have not been fully understood. Therefore, in this dissertation, I examined whether changes in the intrinsic and synaptic excitability of PC is induced in mice underwent 50 min of optokinetic learning. By utilizing the whole-cell patch-clamp recording, I compared the electrophysiological properties between the control and learned group, and found that the mean firing rate of PCs was decreased in response to intracellular depolarizing current injection and the rheobase current was increased in the learned group. In addition, I found that acute optokinetic learning induced a decrease in excitatory synaptic transmission at parallel fiber to PC synapse by reducing the presynaptic release probability. Taken together, optokinetic learning induces the suppressed neuronal excitability at both the intrinsic and synaptic factors of cerebellar PCs, suggesting the possibility of the occurrence of multiple plasticity governing cerebellum-dependent motor learning. In this dissertation, I conducted two independent observational studies to suggest possible molecular and cellular traces for cerebellum-dependent motor memory. Identified proteins and neural plasticity should lead us to further investigations to validate their roles in memory formation and consolidation. In conclusion, the discoveries in this dissertation would be a potentially important resource for discovering unknown molecules or plasticity mechanisms underlying cerebellum-dependent motor memory.Preface 1 Abstract 2 General Introduction 7 Chapter โ… . Quantitative proteomics reveals distinct molecular signatures of different cerebellum-dependent learning paradigms 10 Introduction 11 Materials and Methods 13 Results 19 Discussion 39 Chapter โ…ก. Suppressed intrinsic and synaptic excitability of cerebellar Purkinje cells following optokinetic learning in mice 45 Introduction 46 Materials and Methods 47 Results 51 Discussion 65 General Conclusion 69 Bibliography 70 Abstract in Korean 78๋ฐ•

    Optogenetic perturbations reveal the dynamics of an oculomotor integrator

    Get PDF
    Many neural systems can store short-term information in persistently firing neurons. Such persistent activity is believed to be maintained by recurrent feedback among neurons. This hypothesis has been fleshed out in detail for the oculomotor integrator (OI) for which the so-called โ€œline attractorโ€ network model can explain a large set of observations. Here we show that there is a plethora of such models, distinguished by the relative strength of recurrent excitation and inhibition. In each model, the firing rates of the neurons relax toward the persistent activity states. The dynamics of relaxation can be quite different, however, and depend on the levels of recurrent excitation and inhibition. To identify the correct model, we directly measure these relaxation dynamics by performing optogenetic perturbations in the OI of zebrafish expressing halorhodopsin or channelrhodopsin. We show that instantaneous, inhibitory stimulations of the OI lead to persistent, centripetal eye position changes ipsilateral to the stimulation. Excitatory stimulations similarly cause centripetal eye position changes, yet only contralateral to the stimulation. These results show that the dynamics of the OI are organized around a central attractor stateโ€”the null position of the eyesโ€”which stabilizes the system against random perturbations. Our results pose new constraints on the circuit connectivity of the system and provide new insights into the mechanisms underlying persistent activity

    Implementation of a line attractor-based model of the gaze holding integrator using nonlinear spiking neuron models

    Get PDF
    Thesis (M. Eng.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 1996.Includes bibliographical references (leaves 30-31).by Ben Y. Reis.M.Eng

    Eye velocity gain fields for visuo- motor coordinate transformations

    Get PDF
    โ€™Gain-field-likeโ€™ tuning behavior is characterized by a modulation of the neuronal response depending on a certain variable, without changing the actual receptive field characteristics in relation to another variable. Eye position gain fields were first observed in area 7a of the posterior parietal cortex (PPC), where visually responsive neurons are modulated by ocular position. Analysis of artificial neural networks has shown that this type of tuning function might comprise the neuronal substrate for coordinate transformations. In this work, neuronal activity in the dorsal medial superior temporal area (MSTd) has been analyzed with an focus on itโ€™s involvement in oculomotor control. MSTd is part of the extrastriate visual cortex and located in the PPC. Lesion studies suggested a participation of this cortical area in the control of eye movements. Inactivation of MSTd severely impairs the optokinetic response (OKR), which is an reflex-like kind of eye movement that compensates for motion of the whole visual scene. Using a novel, information-theory based approach for neuronal data analysis, we were able to identify those visual and eye movement related signals which were most correlated to the mean rate of spiking activity in MSTd neurons during optokinetic stimulation. In a majority of neurons firing rate was non-linearly related to a combination of retinal image velocity and eye velocity. The observed neuronal latency relative to these signals is in line with a system-level model of OKR, where an efference copy of the motor command signal is used to generate an internal estimate of the head-centered stimulus velocity signal. Tuning functions were obtained by using a probabilistic approach. In most MSTd neurons these functions exhibited gain-field-like shapes, with eye velocity modulating the visual response in a multiplicative manner. Population analysis revealed a large diversity of tuning forms including asymmetric and non-separable functions. The distribution of gain fields was almost identical to the predictions from a neural network model trained to perform the summation of image and eye velocity. These findings therefore strongly support the hypothesis of MSTdโ€™s participation in the OKR control system by implementing the transformation from retinal image velocity to an estimate of stimulus velocity. In this sense, eye velocity gain fields constitute an intermediate step in transforming the eye-centered to a head-centered visual motion signal.Another aspect that was addressed in this work was the comparison of the irregularity of MSTd spiking activity during optokinetic response with the behavior during pure visual stimulation. The goal of this study was an evaluation of potential neuronal mechanisms underlying the observed gain field behavior. We found that both inter- and intra-trial variability were decreased with increasing retinal image velocity, but increased with eye velocity. This observation argues against a symmetrical integration of driving and modulating inputs. Instead, we propose an architecture where multiplicative gain modulation is achieved by simultaneous increase of excitatory and inhibitory background synaptic input. A conductance-based single-compartment model neuron was able to reproduce realistic gain modulation and the observed stimulus-dependence of neural variability, at the same time. In summary, this work leads to improved knowledge about MSTdโ€™s role in visuomotor transformation by analyzing various functional and mechanistic aspects of eye velocity gain fields on a systems-, network-, and neuronal level

    Aspects Of The Oculomotor System Of Callinectes Sapidus

    Get PDF
    An isolated perfused preparation was developed for the study of several aspects of the oculomotor system of the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus. The system for eyestalk rotation was investigated on an extracellular level. Two antagonistic pairs of muscles under visual and statocyst control were found to be responsible for stabilization and rotation of the eyestalk. The primary sensory input to the muscles appears to be from the statocysts, with both static position sense and dynamic acceleration components influencing the motor response. Two sensory feedback systems from mechanoreceptive hairs were found which influence the response of the eye stalks to statocyst input. The function of one system appears to be to allowยท the animal to differentiate between statocyst stimulation caused by whole body movement and that caused by movement of the basal segment of the antennule in which the statocyst is lodged. The second negative feedback system appears to have a multiple function. It is believed to function to null out the tonic excitatory position sense input from the statocysts when it is necessary for the eye to make a movement which is contrary to the position sense input as, for example, when the animal is following a visual target whose direction is opposite to that of the statocyst drive. It also produces reciprocal inhibition of the antagonist muscle. In addition, this system may be responsible for the incomplete compensation seen in compensatory eye movements made in response to pitch of the body. A preliminary survey of the oculomotor neurons and interneurons in the cerebral ganglion established the potential of this ganglion for intracellular recording from components of the oculomotor system. Recordings were made from both motorneurons and interneurons. The recording from interneurone of the oculomotor system was particularly good. Eye movements could be elicted in response to visual and tactile stimuli while recording from the ganglion. The preparation appears ยทto be an excellent system in which to undertake an extensive analysis of intracellular events in the neuronal network underlying stereotyped eye movements and could lead to an understanding of the neuronal basis for such movements. In the course of the above work on the oculomotor system, same observations were made on the cor frontale which controls the blood pressure to the cerebral system. The cor frontale had been thought to function as a heart regulating blood flow to the cerebral ganglion. It appears from this work that the cor frontale may not function as a heart but rather as a resistive mechanism for regulation of the blood pressure, more like the vertebrate arteriole. Furthermore, the function of this organ may not be to protect the flow to the cerebral ganglion but rather to insure the constancy of the pressure in the peripheral sensory, integrative and oculomotor apparatus of the eyecup
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore