National Mesothelioma Virtual Bank: A standard based biospecimen and clinical data resource to enhance translational research

Background: Advances in translational research have led to the need for well characterized biospecimens for research. The National Mesothelioma Virtual Bank is an initiative which collects annotated datasets relevant to human mesothelioma to develop an enterprising biospecimen resource to fulfill researchers' need. Methods: The National Mesothelioma Virtual Bank architecture is based on three major components: (a) common data elements (based on College of American Pathologists protocol and National North American Association of Central Cancer Registries standards), (b) clinical and epidemiologic data annotation, and (c) data query tools. These tools work interoperably to standardize the entire process of annotation. The National Mesothelioma Virtual Bank tool is based upon the caTISSUE Clinical Annotation Engine, developed by the University of Pittsburgh in cooperation with the Cancer Biomedical Informatics Grid™ (caBIG™, see http://cabig.nci.nih.gov). This application provides a web-based system for annotating, importing and searching mesothelioma cases. The underlying information model is constructed utilizing Unified Modeling Language class diagrams, hierarchical relationships and Enterprise Architect software. Result: The database provides researchers real-time access to richly annotated specimens and integral information related to mesothelioma. The data disclosed is tightly regulated depending upon users' authorization and depending on the participating institute that is amenable to the local Institutional Review Board and regulation committee reviews. Conclusion: The National Mesothelioma Virtual Bank currently has over 600 annotated cases available for researchers that include paraffin embedded tissues, tissue microarrays, serum and genomic DNA. The National Mesothelioma Virtual Bank is a virtual biospecimen registry with robust translational biomedical informatics support to facilitate basic science, clinical, and translational research. Furthermore, it protects patient privacy by disclosing only de-identified datasets to assure that biospecimens can be made accessible to researchers. © 2008 Amin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd

Semantic processing of EHR data for clinical research

There is a growing need to semantically process and integrate clinical data from different sources for clinical research. This paper presents an approach to integrate EHRs from heterogeneous resources and generate integrated data in different data formats or semantics to support various clinical research applications. The proposed approach builds semantic data virtualization layers on top of data sources, which generate data in the requested semantics or formats on demand. This approach avoids upfront dumping to and synchronizing of the data with various representations. Data from different EHR systems are first mapped to RDF data with source semantics, and then converted to representations with harmonized domain semantics where domain ontologies and terminologies are used to improve reusability. It is also possible to further convert data to application semantics and store the converted results in clinical research databases, e.g. i2b2, OMOP, to support different clinical research settings. Semantic conversions between different representations are explicitly expressed using N3 rules and executed by an N3 Reasoner (EYE), which can also generate proofs of the conversion processes. The solution presented in this paper has been applied to real-world applications that process large scale EHR data.Comment: Accepted for publication in Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 2015, preprint versio

An Evaluation of the Use of a Clinical Research Data Warehouse and I2b2 Infrastructure to Facilitate Replication of Research

Replication of clinical research is requisite for forming effective clinical decisions and guidelines. While rerunning a clinical trial may be unethical and prohibitively expensive, the adoption of EHRs and the infrastructure for distributed research networks provide access to clinical data for observational and retrospective studies. Herein I demonstrate a means of using these tools to validate existing results and extend the findings to novel populations. I describe the process of evaluating published risk models as well as local data and infrastructure to assess the replicability of the study. I use an example of a risk model unable to be replicated as well as a study of in-hospital mortality risk I replicated using UNMC’s clinical research data warehouse. In these examples and other studies we have participated in, some elements are commonly missing or under-developed. One such missing element is a consistent and computable phenotype for pregnancy status based on data recorded in the EHR. I survey local clinical data and identify a number of variables correlated with pregnancy as well as demonstrate the data required to identify the temporal bounds of a pregnancy episode. Next, another common obstacle to replicating risk models is the necessity of linking to alternative data sources while maintaining data in a de-identified database. I demonstrate a pipeline for linking clinical data to socioeconomic variables and indices obtained from the American Community Survey (ACS). While these data are location-based, I provide a method for storing them in a HIPAA compliant fashion so as not to identify a patient’s location. While full and efficient replication of all clinical studies is still a future goal, the demonstration of replication as well as beginning the development of a computable phenotype for pregnancy and the incorporation of location based data in a de-identified data warehouse demonstrate how the EHR data and a research infrastructure may be used to facilitate this effort

Roadmap to a Comprehensive Clinical Data Warehouse for Precision Medicine Applications in Oncology

Leading institutions throughout the country have established Precision Medicine programs to support personalized treatment of patients. A cornerstone for these programs is the establishment of enterprise-wide Clinical Data Warehouses. Working shoulder-to-shoulder, a team of physicians, systems biologists, engineers, and scientists at Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey have designed, developed, and implemented the Warehouse with information originating from data sources, including Electronic Medical Records, Clinical Trial Management Systems, Tumor Registries, Biospecimen Repositories, Radiology and Pathology archives, and Next Generation Sequencing services. Innovative solutions were implemented to detect and extract unstructured clinical information that was embedded in paper/text documents, including synoptic pathology reports. Supporting important precision medicine use cases, the growing Warehouse enables physicians to systematically mine and review the molecular, genomic, image-based, and correlated clinical information of patient tumors individually or as part of large cohorts to identify changes and patterns that may influence treatment decisions and potential outcomes

The Assessment of Technology Adoption Interventions and Outcome Achievement Related to the Use of a Clinical Research Data Warehouse

Introduction: While funding for research has declined since 2004, the need for rapid, innovative, and lifesaving clinical and translational research has never been greater due to the rise in chronic health conditions, which have resulted in lower life expectancy and higher rates of mortality and adverse outcomes. Finding effective diagnostic and treatment methods to address the complex challenges in individual and population health will require a team science approach, creating the need for multidisciplinary collaboration among practitioners and researchers. To address this need, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) created the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) program. The CTSA program distributes funds to a national network of medical research institutions, known as “hubs,” that work together to improve the translational research process. With this funding, each hub is required to achieve specific goals to support clinical and translational research teams by providing a variety of services, including cutting edge use of informatics technologies. As a result, the majority of CTSA recipients have implemented and maintain data warehouses, which combine disparate data types from a range of clinical and administrative sources, include data from multiple institutions, and support a variety of workflows. These data warehouses provide comprehensive sets of data that extend beyond the contents of a single EHR system and provide more valuable information for translational research. Although significant research has been conducted related to this technology, gaps exist regarding research team adoption of data warehouses. As a result, more information is needed to understand how data warehouses are adopted and what outcomes are achieved when using them. Specifically, this study focuses on three gaps: research team awareness of data warehouses, the outcomes of data warehouse training for research teams, and how to measure objectively outcomes achieved after training. By assessing and measuring data warehouse use, this study aims to provide a greater understanding of data warehouse adoption and the outcomes achieved. With this understanding, the most effective and efficient development, implementation, and maintenance strategies can be used to increase the return on investment for these resource-intensive technologies. In addition, technologies can be better designed to ensure they are meeting the needs of clinical and translational science in the 21st century and beyond. Methods: During the study period, presentations were held to raise awareness of data warehouse technology. In addition, training sessions were provided that focused on the use of data warehouses for research projects. To assess the impact of the presentations and training sessions, pre- and post-assessments gauged knowledge and likelihood to use the technology. As objective measurements, the number of data warehouse access and training requests were obtained, and audit trails were reviewed to assess trainee activities within the data warehouse. Finally, trainees completed a 30-day post-training assessment to provide information about barriers and benefits of the technology. Results: Key study findings suggest that the awareness presentations and training were successful in increasing research team knowledge of data warehouses and likelihood to use this technology, but did not result in a subsequent increase in access or training requests within the study period. In addition, 24% of trainees completed the associated data warehouse activities to achieve their intended outcomes within 30 days of training. The time needed for adopting the technology, the ease of use of data warehouses, the types of support available, and the data available within the data warehouse may all be factors influencing this completion rate. Conclusion: The key finding of this study is that data warehouse awareness presentations and training sessions are insufficient to result in research team adoption of the technology within a three-month study period. Several important implications can be drawn from this finding. First, the timeline for technology adoption requires further investigation, although it is likely longer than 90 days. Future assessments of technology adoption should include an individual’s timeline for pursuing the use of that technology. Second, this study provided a definition for outcome achievement, which was completion o

Focal Spot, Winter 1984/85

https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/focal_spot_archives/1039/thumbnail.jp

WormBase 2012: more genomes, more data, new website

Since its release in 2000, WormBase (http://www.wormbase.org) has grown from a small resource focusing on a single species and serving a dedicated research community, to one now spanning 15 species essential to the broader biomedical and agricultural research fields. To enhance the rate of curation, we have automated the identification of key data in the scientific literature and use similar methodology for data extraction. To ease access to the data, we are collaborating with journals to link entities in research publications to their report pages at WormBase. To facilitate discovery, we have added new views of the data, integrated large-scale datasets and expanded descriptions of models for human disease. Finally, we have introduced a dramatic overhaul of the WormBase website for public beta testing. Designed to balance complexity and usability, the new site is species-agnostic, highly customizable, and interactive. Casual users and developers alike will be able to leverage the public RESTful application programming interface (API) to generate custom data mining solutions and extensions to the site. We report on the growth of our database and on our work in keeping pace with the growing demand for data, efforts to anticipate the requirements of users and new collaborations with the larger science community

Practices and challenges in clinical data sharing

The debate on data access and privacy is an ongoing one. It is kept alive by the never-ending changes/upgrades in (i) the shape of the data collected (in terms of size, diversity, sensitivity and quality), (ii) the laws governing data sharing, (iii) the amount of free public data available on individuals (social media, blogs, population-based databases, etc.), as well as (iv) the available privacy enhancing technologies. This paper identifies current directions, challenges and best practices in constructing a clinical data-sharing framework for research purposes. Specifically, we create a taxonomy for the framework, identify the design choices available within each taxon, and demonstrate thew choices using current legal frameworks. The purpose is to devise best practices for the implementation of an effective, safe and transparent research access framework

The Smart Data Extractor, a Clinician Friendly Solution to Accelerate and Improve the Data Collection During Clinical Trials

In medical research, the traditional way to collect data, i.e. browsing patient files, has been proven to induce bias, errors, human labor and costs. We propose a semi-automated system able to extract every type of data, including notes. The Smart Data Extractor pre-populates clinic research forms by following rules. We performed a cross-testing experiment to compare semi-automated to manual data collection. 20 target items had to be collected for 79 patients. The average time to complete one form was 6'81'' for manual data collection and 3'22'' with the Smart Data Extractor. There were also more mistakes during manual data collection (163 for the whole cohort) than with the Smart Data Extractor (46 for the whole cohort). We present an easy to use, understandable and agile solution to fill out clinical research forms. It reduces human effort and provides higher quality data, avoiding data re-entry and fatigue induced errors.Comment: IOS Press, 2023, Studies in Health Technology and Informatic