Factors and Connected Factors in Tough Graphs with High Isolated Toughness

In this paper, we show that every $1$-tough graph with order and isolated toughness at least $r+1$ has a factor whose degrees are $r$, except for at most one vertex with degree $r+1$. Using this result, we conclude that every $3$-tough graph with order and isolated toughness at least $r+1$ has a connected factor whose degrees lie in the set $\{r,r+1\}$, where $r\ge 3$. Also, we show that this factor can be found $m$-tree-connected, when $G$ is a $(2m+\epsilon)$-tough graph with order and isolated toughness at least $r+1$, where $r\ge (2m-1)(2m/\epsilon+1)$ and $\epsilon > 0$. Next, we prove that every $(m+\epsilon)$-tough graph of order at least $2m$ with high enough isolated toughness admits an $m$-tree-connected factor with maximum degree at most $2m+1$. From this result, we derive that every $(2+\epsilon)$-tough graph of order at least three with high enough isolated toughness has a spanning Eulerian subgraph whose degrees lie in the set $\{2,4\}$. In addition, we provide a family of $5/3$-tough graphs with high enough isolated toughness having no connected even factors with bounded maximum degree

A Survey of Best Monotone Degree Conditions for Graph Properties

We survey sufficient degree conditions, for a variety of graph properties, that are best possible in the same sense that Chvatal's well-known degree condition for hamiltonicity is best possible.Comment: 25 page

Debonding along the fixed anchor length of a ground anchorage

Peer reviewedPostprin

On some intriguing problems in Hamiltonian graph theory -- A survey

We survey results and open problems in Hamiltonian graph theory centred around three themes: regular graphs, $t$-tough graphs, and claw-free graphs

Spanning Trees and Spanning Eulerian Subgraphs with Small Degrees. II

Let $G$ be a connected graph with $X\subseteq V(G)$ and with the spanning forest $F$. Let $\lambda\in [0,1]$ be a real number and let $\eta:X\rightarrow (\lambda,\infty)$ be a real function. In this paper, we show that if for all $S\subseteq X$, $\omega(G\setminus S)\le\sum_{v\in S}\big(\eta(v)-2\big)+2-\lambda(e_G(S)+1)$, then $G$ has a spanning tree $T$ containing $F$ such that for each vertex $v\in X$, $d_T(v)\le \lceil\eta(v)-\lambda\rceil+\max\{0,d_F(v)-1\}$, where $\omega(G\setminus S)$ denotes the number of components of $G\setminus S$ and $e_G(S)$ denotes the number of edges of $G$ with both ends in $S$. This is an improvement of several results and the condition is best possible. Next, we also investigate an extension for this result and deduce that every $k$-edge-connected graph $G$ has a spanning subgraph $H$ containing $m$ edge-disjoint spanning trees such that for each vertex $v$, $d_H(v)\le \big\lceil \frac{m}{k}(d_G(v)-2m)\big\rceil+2m$, where $k\ge 2m$; also if $G$ contains $k$ edge-disjoint spanning trees, then $H$ can be found such that for each vertex $v$, $d_H(v)\le \big\lceil \frac{m}{k}(d_G(v)-m)\big\rceil+m$, where $k\ge m$. Finally, we show that strongly $2$-tough graphs, including $(3+1/2)$-tough graphs of order at least three, have spanning Eulerian subgraphs whose degrees lie in the set $\{2,4\}$. In addition, we show that every $1$-tough graph has spanning closed walk meeting each vertex at most $2$ times and prove a long-standing conjecture due to Jackson and Wormald (1990).Comment: 46 pages, Keywords: Spanning tree; spanning Eulerian; spanning closed walk; connected factor; toughness; total exces

Nondestructive techniques for characterizing mechanical properties of structural materials: An overview

An overview of nondestructive evaluation (NDE) is presented to indicate the availability and application potentials of techniques for quantitative characterization of the mechanical properties of structural materials. The purpose is to review NDE techniques that go beyond the usual emphasis on flaw detection and characterization. Discussed are current and emerging NDE techniques that can verify and monitor entrinsic properties (e.g., tensile, shear, and yield strengths; fracture toughness, hardness, ductility; elastic moduli) and underlying microstructural and morphological factors. Most of the techniques described are, at present, neither widely applied nor widely accepted in commerce and industry because they are still emerging from the laboratory. The limitations of the techniques may be overcome by advances in applications research and instrumentation technology and perhaps by accommodations for their use in the design of structural parts