Locating-total dominating sets in twin-free graphs: a conjecture

A total dominating set of a graph $G$ is a set $D$ of vertices of $G$ such that every vertex of $G$ has a neighbor in $D$. A locating-total dominating set of $G$ is a total dominating set $D$ of $G$ with the additional property that every two distinct vertices outside $D$ have distinct neighbors in $D$; that is, for distinct vertices $u$ and $v$ outside $D$, $N(u) \cap D \ne N(v) \cap D$ where $N(u)$ denotes the open neighborhood of $u$. A graph is twin-free if every two distinct vertices have distinct open and closed neighborhoods. The location-total domination number of $G$, denoted $LT(G)$, is the minimum cardinality of a locating-total dominating set in $G$. It is well-known that every connected graph of order $n \geq 3$ has a total dominating set of size at most $\frac{2}{3}n$. We conjecture that if $G$ is a twin-free graph of order $n$ with no isolated vertex, then $LT(G) \leq \frac{2}{3}n$. We prove the conjecture for graphs without $4$-cycles as a subgraph. We also prove that if $G$ is a twin-free graph of order $n$, then $LT(G) \le \frac{3}{4}n$.Comment: 18 pages, 1 figur

Upper bounds on the k-forcing number of a graph

Given a simple undirected graph $G$ and a positive integer $k$, the $k$-forcing number of $G$, denoted $F_k(G)$, is the minimum number of vertices that need to be initially colored so that all vertices eventually become colored during the discrete dynamical process described by the following rule. Starting from an initial set of colored vertices and stopping when all vertices are colored: if a colored vertex has at most $k$ non-colored neighbors, then each of its non-colored neighbors becomes colored. When $k=1$, this is equivalent to the zero forcing number, usually denoted with $Z(G)$, a recently introduced invariant that gives an upper bound on the maximum nullity of a graph. In this paper, we give several upper bounds on the $k$-forcing number. Notable among these, we show that if $G$ is a graph with order $n \ge 2$ and maximum degree $\Delta \ge k$, then $F_k(G) \le \frac{(\Delta-k+1)n}{\Delta - k + 1 +\min{\{\delta,k\}}}$. This simplifies to, for the zero forcing number case of $k=1$, $Z(G)=F_1(G) \le \frac{\Delta n}{\Delta+1}$. Moreover, when $\Delta \ge 2$ and the graph is $k$-connected, we prove that $F_k(G) \leq \frac{(\Delta-2)n+2}{\Delta+k-2}$, which is an improvement when $k\leq 2$, and specializes to, for the zero forcing number case, $Z(G)= F_1(G) \le \frac{(\Delta -2)n+2}{\Delta -1}$. These results resolve a problem posed by Meyer about regular bipartite circulant graphs. Finally, we present a relationship between the $k$-forcing number and the connected $k$-domination number. As a corollary, we find that the sum of the zero forcing number and connected domination number is at most the order for connected graphs.Comment: 15 pages, 0 figure

k-Tuple_Total_Domination_in_Inflated_Graphs

The inflated graph $G_{I}$ of a graph $G$ with $n(G)$ vertices is obtained from $G$ by replacing every vertex of degree $d$ of $G$ by a clique, which is isomorph to the complete graph $K_{d}$, and each edge $(x_{i},x_{j})$ of $G$ is replaced by an edge $(u,v)$ in such a way that $u\in X_{i}$, $v\in X_{j}$, and two different edges of $G$ are replaced by non-adjacent edges of $G_{I}$. For integer $k\geq 1$, the $k$-tuple total domination number $\gamma_{\times k,t}(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a $k$-tuple total dominating set of $G$, which is a set of vertices in $G$ such that every vertex of $G$ is adjacent to at least $k$ vertices in it. For existing this number, must the minimum degree of $G$ is at least $k$. Here, we study the $k$-tuple total domination number in inflated graphs when $k\geq 2$. First we prove that $n(G)k\leq \gamma_{\times k,t}(G_{I})\leq n(G)(k+1)-1$, and then we characterize graphs $G$ that the $k$-tuple total domination number number of $G_I$ is $n(G)k$ or $n(G)k+1$. Then we find bounds for this number in the inflated graph $G_I$, when $G$ has a cut-edge $e$ or cut-vertex $v$, in terms on the $k$-tuple total domination number of the inflated graphs of the components of $G-e$ or $v$-components of $G-v$, respectively. Finally, we calculate this number in the inflated graphs that have obtained by some of the known graphs