Interpretable Hyperspectral AI: When Non-Convex Modeling meets Hyperspectral Remote Sensing

Hyperspectral imaging, also known as image spectrometry, is a landmark technique in geoscience and remote sensing (RS). In the past decade, enormous efforts have been made to process and analyze these hyperspectral (HS) products mainly by means of seasoned experts. However, with the ever-growing volume of data, the bulk of costs in manpower and material resources poses new challenges on reducing the burden of manual labor and improving efficiency. For this reason, it is, therefore, urgent to develop more intelligent and automatic approaches for various HS RS applications. Machine learning (ML) tools with convex optimization have successfully undertaken the tasks of numerous artificial intelligence (AI)-related applications. However, their ability in handling complex practical problems remains limited, particularly for HS data, due to the effects of various spectral variabilities in the process of HS imaging and the complexity and redundancy of higher dimensional HS signals. Compared to the convex models, non-convex modeling, which is capable of characterizing more complex real scenes and providing the model interpretability technically and theoretically, has been proven to be a feasible solution to reduce the gap between challenging HS vision tasks and currently advanced intelligent data processing models

Non-convex regularization in remote sensing

In this paper, we study the effect of different regularizers and their implications in high dimensional image classification and sparse linear unmixing. Although kernelization or sparse methods are globally accepted solutions for processing data in high dimensions, we present here a study on the impact of the form of regularization used and its parametrization. We consider regularization via traditional squared (2) and sparsity-promoting (1) norms, as well as more unconventional nonconvex regularizers (p and Log Sum Penalty). We compare their properties and advantages on several classification and linear unmixing tasks and provide advices on the choice of the best regularizer for the problem at hand. Finally, we also provide a fully functional toolbox for the community.Comment: 11 pages, 11 figure

Regularization approaches to hyperspectral unmixing

We consider a few different approaches to hyperspectral unmixing of remotely sensed imagery which exploit and extend recent advances in sparse statistical regularization, handling of constraints and dictionary reduction. Hyperspectral unmixing methods often use a conventional least-squares based lasso which assumes that the data follows the Gaussian distribution, we use this as a starting point. In addition, we consider a robust approach to sparse spectral unmixing of remotely sensed imagery which reduces the sensitivity of the estimator to outliers. Due to water absorption and atmospheric effects that affect data collection, hyperspectral images are prone to have large outliers. The framework comprises of several well-principled penalties. A non-convex, hyper-Laplacian prior is incorporated to induce sparsity in the number of active pure spectral components, and total variation regularizer is included to exploit the spatial-contextual information of hyperspectral images. Enforcing the sum-to-one and non-negativity constraint on the models parameters is essential for obtaining realistic estimates. We consider two approaches to account for this: an iterative heuristic renormalization and projection onto the positive orthant, and a reparametrization of the coefficients which gives rise to a theoretically founded method. Since the large size of modern spectral libraries cannot only present computational challenges but also introduce collinearities between regressors, we introduce a library reduction step. This uses the multiple signal classi fication (MUSIC) array processing algorithm, which both speeds up unmixing and yields superior results in scenarios where the library size is extensive. We show that although these problems are non-convex, they can be solved by a properly de fined algorithm based on either trust region optimization or iteratively reweighted least squares. The performance of the different approaches is validated in several simulated and real hyperspectral data experiments