Bridging the Gap Between Retrieval and Summarization

Information Retrieval is, at its core, a field focused on providing information to users to fulfill an information need. One of the most common use cases of Information Retrieval is document-level retrieval, which seeks to provide a collection of documents to the user that addresses their needs. In contrast to this, single document retrieval seeks to instead provide the user with a single document comprised of all required information. We seek to extend single document retrieval to single document generation, in which we use multiple source documents to create a new document which directly addresses the information need

Semantics-driven Abstractive Document Summarization

The evolution of the Web over the last three decades has led to a deluge of scientific and news articles on the Internet. Harnessing these publications in different fields of study is critical to effective end user information consumption. Similarly, in the domain of healthcare, one of the key challenges with the adoption of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) for clinical practice has been the tremendous amount of clinical notes generated that can be summarized without which clinical decision making and communication will be inefficient and costly. In spite of the rapid advances in information retrieval and deep learning techniques towards abstractive document summarization, the results of these efforts continue to resemble extractive summaries, achieving promising results predominantly on lexical metrics but performing poorly on semantic metrics. Thus, abstractive summarization that is driven by intrinsic and extrinsic semantics of documents is not adequately explored. Resources that can be used for generating semantics-driven abstractive summaries include: • Abstracts of multiple scientific articles published in a given technical field of study to generate an abstractive summary for topically-related abstracts within the field, thus reducing the load of having to read semantically duplicate abstracts on a given topic. • Citation contexts from different authoritative papers citing a reference paper can be used to generate utility-oriented abstractive summary for a scientific article. • Biomedical articles and the named entities characterizing the biomedical articles along with background knowledge bases to generate entity and fact-aware abstractive summaries. • Clinical notes of patients and clinical knowledge bases for abstractive clinical text summarization using knowledge-driven multi-objective optimization. In this dissertation, we develop semantics-driven abstractive models based on intra- document and inter-document semantic analyses along with facts of named entities retrieved from domain-specific knowledge bases to produce summaries. Concretely, we propose a sequence of frameworks leveraging semantics at various granularity (e.g., word, sentence, document, topic, citations, and named entities) levels, by utilizing external resources. The proposed frameworks have been applied to a range of tasks including 1. Abstractive summarization of topic-centric multi-document scientific articles and news articles. 2. Abstractive summarization of scientific articles using crowd-sourced citation contexts. 3. Abstractive summarization of biomedical articles clustered based on entity-relatedness. 4. Abstractive summarization of clinical notes of patients with heart failure and Chest X-Rays recordings. The proposed approaches achieve impressive performance in terms of preserving semantics in abstractive summarization while paraphrasing. For summarization of topic-centric multiple scientific/news articles, we propose a three-stage approach where abstracts of scientific articles or news articles are clustered based on their topical similarity determined from topics generated using Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), followed by extractive phase and abstractive phase. Then, in the next stage, we focus on abstractive summarization of biomedical literature where we leverage named entities in biomedical articles to 1) cluster related articles; and 2) leverage the named entities towards guiding abstractive summarization. Finally, in the last stage, we turn to external resources such as citation contexts pointing to a scientific article to generate a comprehensive and utility-centric abstractive summary of a scientific article, domain-specific knowledge bases to fill gaps in information about entities in a biomedical article to summarize and clinical notes to guide abstractive summarization of clinical text. Thus, the bottom-up progression of exploring semantics towards abstractive summarization in this dissertation starts with (i) Semantic Analysis of Latent Topics; builds on (ii) Internal and External Knowledge-I (gleaned from abstracts and Citation Contexts); and extends it to make it comprehensive using (iii) Internal and External Knowledge-II (Named Entities and Knowledge Bases)

A Graph-Based Approach for the Summarization of Scientific Articles

Automatic text summarization is one of the eminent applications in the field of Natural Language Processing. Text summarization is the process of generating a gist from text documents. The task is to produce a summary which contains important, diverse and coherent information, i.e., a summary should be self-contained. The approaches for text summarization are conventionally extractive. The extractive approaches select a subset of sentences from an input document for a summary. In this thesis, we introduce a novel graph-based extractive summarization approach. With the progressive advancement of research in the various fields of science, the summarization of scientific articles has become an essential requirement for researchers. This is our prime motivation in selecting scientific articles as our dataset. This newly formed dataset contains scientific articles from the PLOS Medicine journal, which is a high impact journal in the field of biomedicine. The summarization of scientific articles is a single-document summarization task. It is a complex task due to various reasons, one of it being, the important information in the scientific article is scattered all over it and another reason being, scientific articles contain numerous redundant information. In our approach, we deal with the three important factors of summarization: importance, non-redundancy and coherence. To deal with these factors, we use graphs as they solve data sparsity problems and are computationally less complex. We employ bipartite graphical representation for the summarization task, exclusively. We represent input documents through a bipartite graph that consists of sentence nodes and entity nodes. This bipartite graph representation contains entity transition information which is beneficial for selecting the relevant sentences for a summary. We use a graph-based ranking algorithm to rank the sentences in a document. The ranks are considered as relevance scores of the sentences which are further used in our approach. Scientific articles contain reasonable amount of redundant information, for example, Introduction and Methodology sections contain similar information regarding the motivation and approach. In our approach, we ensure that the summary contains sentences which are non-redundant. Though the summary should contain important and non-redundant information of the input document, its sentences should be connected to one another such that it becomes coherent, understandable and simple to read. If we do not ensure that a summary is coherent, its sentences may not be properly connected. This leads to an obscure summary. Until now, only few summarization approaches take care of coherence. In our approach, we take care of coherence in two different ways: by using the graph measure and by using the structural information. We employ outdegree as the graph measure and coherence patterns for the structural information, in our approach. We use integer programming as an optimization technique, to select the best subset of sentences for a summary. The sentences are selected on the basis of relevance, diversity and coherence measure. The computation of these measures is tightly integrated and taken care of simultaneously. We use human judgements to evaluate coherence of summaries. We compare ROUGE scores and human judgements of different systems on the PLOS Medicine dataset. Our approach performs considerably better than other systems on this dataset. Also, we apply our approach on the standard DUC 2002 dataset to compare the results with the recent state-of-the-art systems. The results show that our graph-based approach outperforms other systems on DUC 2002. In conclusion, our approach is robust, i.e., it works on both scientific and news articles. Our approach has the further advantage of being semi-supervised