12,189 research outputs found
Time-Optimal Loosely-Stabilizing Leader Election in Population Protocols
We consider the leader election problem in the population protocol model. In pragmatic settings of population protocols, self-stabilization is a highly desired feature owing to its fault resilience and the benefit of initialization freedom. However, the design of self-stabilizing leader election is possible only under a strong assumption (i.e., the knowledge of the exact size of a network) and rich computational resource (i.e., the number of states). Loose-stabilization is a promising relaxed concept of self-stabilization to address the aforementioned issue. Loose-stabilization guarantees that starting from any configuration, the network will reach a safe configuration where a single leader exists within a short time, and thereafter it will maintain the single leader for a long time, but not necessarily forever. The main contribution of this paper is giving a time-optimal loosely-stabilizing leader election protocol. The proposed protocol with design parameter ? ? 1 attains O(? log n) parallel convergence time and ?(n^?) parallel holding time (i.e., the length of the period keeping the unique leader), both in expectation. This protocol is time-optimal in the sense of both the convergence and holding times in expectation because any loosely-stabilizing leader election protocol with the same length of the holding time is known to require ?(? log n) parallel time
Fast Space Optimal Leader Election in Population Protocols
The model of population protocols refers to the growing in popularity
theoretical framework suitable for studying pairwise interactions within a
large collection of simple indistinguishable entities, frequently called
agents. In this paper the emphasis is on the space complexity in fast leader
election via population protocols governed by the random scheduler, which
uniformly at random selects pairwise interactions within the population of n
agents.
The main result of this paper is a new fast and space optimal leader election
protocol. The new protocol utilises O(log^2 n) parallel time (which is
equivalent to O(n log^2 n) sequential pairwise interactions), and each agent
operates on O(log log n) states. This double logarithmic space usage matches
asymptotically the lower bound 1/2 log log n on the minimal number of states
required by agents in any leader election algorithm with the running time
o(n/polylog n).
Our solution takes an advantage of the concept of phase clocks, a fundamental
synchronisation and coordination tool in distributed computing. We propose a
new fast and robust population protocol for initialisation of phase clocks to
be run simultaneously in multiple modes and intertwined with the leader
election process. We also provide the reader with the relevant formal
argumentation indicating that our solution is always correct, and fast with
high probability.Comment: 21 pages, 2 figures, published in SODA 2018 proceeding
Almost Logarithmic-Time Space Optimal Leader Election in Population Protocols
The model of population protocols refers to a large collection of simple indistinguishable entities, frequently called {\em agents}. The agents communicate and perform computation through pairwise interactions. We study fast and space efficient leader election in population of cardinality governed by a random scheduler, where during each time step the scheduler uniformly at random selects for interaction exactly one pair of agents. We propose the first -time leader election protocol. Our solution operates in expected parallel time which is equivalent to pairwise interactions. This is the fastest currently known leader election algorithm in which each agent utilises asymptotically optimal number of states. The new protocol incorporates and amalgamates successfully the power of assorted {\em synthetic coins} with variable rate {\em phase clocks}
Fast Space Optimal Leader Election in Population Protocols
The model of population protocols refers to the growing in popularity theoretical framework suitable for studying pairwise interactions within a large collection of simple indistinguishable entities, frequently called agents. In this paper the emphasis is on the space complexity in fast leader election via population protocols governed by the random scheduler, which uniformly at random selects pairwise interactions from the population of n agents. The main result of this paper is a new fast and space optimal leader election protocol. The new protocol operates in parallel time O(log2n) equivalent to O(n log2n) sequential pairwise interactions, in which each agent utilises O(log log n) states. This double logarithmic space utilisation matches asymptotically the lower bound [Equation] log log n on the number of states utilised by agents in any leader election algorithm with the running time [Equation], see [7]. Our solution relies on the concept of phase clocks, a fundamental synchronisation and coordination tool in the field of Distributed Computing. We propose a new fast and robust population protocol for initialisation of phase clocks to be run simultaneously in multiple modes and intertwined with the leader election process. We also provide the reader with the relevant formal argumentation indicating that our solution is always correct and fast with high probability
Efficient size estimation and impossibility of termination in uniform dense population protocols
We study uniform population protocols: networks of anonymous agents whose
pairwise interactions are chosen at random, where each agent uses an identical
transition algorithm that does not depend on the population size . Many
existing polylog time protocols for leader election and majority
computation are nonuniform: to operate correctly, they require all agents to be
initialized with an approximate estimate of (specifically, the exact value
). Our first main result is a uniform protocol for
calculating with high probability in time and
states ( bits of memory). The protocol is
converging but not terminating: it does not signal when the estimate is close
to the true value of . If it could be made terminating, this would
allow composition with protocols, such as those for leader election or
majority, that require a size estimate initially, to make them uniform (though
with a small probability of failure). We do show how our main protocol can be
indirectly composed with others in a simple and elegant way, based on the
leaderless phase clock, demonstrating that those protocols can in fact be made
uniform. However, our second main result implies that the protocol cannot be
made terminating, a consequence of a much stronger result: a uniform protocol
for any task requiring more than constant time cannot be terminating even with
probability bounded above 0, if infinitely many initial configurations are
dense: any state present initially occupies agents. (In particular,
no leader is allowed.) Crucially, the result holds no matter the memory or time
permitted. Finally, we show that with an initial leader, our size-estimation
protocol can be made terminating with high probability, with the same
asymptotic time and space bounds.Comment: Using leaderless phase cloc
Uniform Partition in Population Protocol Model Under Weak Fairness
We focus on a uniform partition problem in a population protocol model. The uniform partition problem aims to divide a population into k groups of the same size, where k is a given positive integer. In the case of k=2 (called uniform bipartition), a previous work clarified space complexity under various assumptions: 1) an initialized base station (BS) or no BS, 2) weak or global fairness, 3) designated or arbitrary initial states of agents, and 4) symmetric or asymmetric protocols, except for the setting that agents execute a protocol from arbitrary initial states under weak fairness in the model with an initialized base station. In this paper, we clarify the space complexity for this remaining setting. In this setting, we prove that P states are necessary and sufficient to realize asymmetric protocols, and that P+1 states are necessary and sufficient to realize symmetric protocols, where P is the known upper bound of the number of agents. From these results and the previous work, we have clarified the solvability of the uniform bipartition for each combination of assumptions. Additionally, we newly consider an assumption on a model of a non-initialized BS and clarify solvability and space complexity in the assumption. Moreover, the results in this paper can be applied to the case that k is an arbitrary integer (called uniform k-partition)
Stable Leader Election in Population Protocols Requires Linear Time
A population protocol *stably elects a leader* if, for all , starting from
an initial configuration with agents each in an identical state, with
probability 1 it reaches a configuration that is correct (exactly
one agent is in a special leader state ) and stable (every configuration
reachable from also has a single agent in state ). We show
that any population protocol that stably elects a leader requires
expected "parallel time" --- expected total pairwise interactions
--- to reach such a stable configuration. Our result also informs the
understanding of the time complexity of chemical self-organization by showing
an essential difficulty in generating exact quantities of molecular species
quickly.Comment: accepted to Distributed Computing special issue of invited papers
from DISC 2015; significantly revised proof structure and intuitive
explanation
Space-Optimal Majority in Population Protocols
Population protocols are a model of distributed computing, in which
agents with limited local state interact randomly, and cooperate to
collectively compute global predicates. An extensive series of papers, across
different communities, has examined the computability and complexity
characteristics of this model. Majority, or consensus, is a central task, in
which agents need to collectively reach a decision as to which one of two
states or had a higher initial count. Two complexity metrics are
important: the time that a protocol requires to stabilize to an output
decision, and the state space size that each agent requires.
It is known that majority requires states per agent to
allow for poly-logarithmic time stabilization, and that states
are sufficient. Thus, there is an exponential gap between the upper and lower
bounds.
We address this question. We provide a new lower bound of
states for any protocol which stabilizes in time, for any constant. This result is conditional on basic monotonicity and output
assumptions, satisfied by all known protocols. Technically, it represents a
significant departure from previous lower bounds. Instead of relying on dense
configurations, we introduce a new surgery technique to construct executions
which contradict the correctness of algorithms that stabilize too fast.
Subsequently, our lower bound applies to general initial configurations.
We give an algorithm for majority which uses states, and
stabilizes in time. Central to the algorithm is a new leaderless
phase clock, which allows nodes to synchronize in phases of
consecutive interactions using states per node. We also employ our
phase clock to build a leader election algorithm with states,
which stabilizes in time
- …