Corticomuscular co-activation based hybrid brain-computer interface for motor recovery monitoring

The effect of corticomuscular coactivation based hybrid brain-computer interface (h-BCI) on post-stroke neurorehabilitation has not been explored yet. A major challenge in this area is to find an appropriate corticomuscular feature which can not only drive an h-BCI but also serve as a biomarker for motor recovery monitoring. Our previous study established the feasibility of a new method of measuring corticomuscular co-activation called correlation of band-limited power time-courses (CBPT) of EEG and EMG signals, outperforming the traditional EEG-EMG coherence in terms of accurately controlling a robotic hand exoskeleton device by the stroke patients. In this paper, we have evaluated the neurophysiological significance of CBPT for motor recovery monitoring by conducting a 5-week long longitudinal pilot trial on 4 chronic hemiparetic stroke patients. Results show that the CBPT variations correlated significantly (p-value< 0.05) with the dynamic changes in motor outcome measures during the therapy for all the patients. As the bandpower based biomarkers are popular in literature, a comparison with such biomarkers has also been made to cross-verify whether the changes in CBPT are indeed neurophysiological. Thus the study concludes that CBPT can serve as a biomarker for motor recovery monitoring while serving as a corticomuscular co-activation feature for h-BCI based neurorehabilitation. Despite an observed significant positive change between pre- and post-intervention motor outcomes, the question of the clinical effectiveness of CBPT is subject to further controlled trial on a larger cohort

An overview of current approaches and future challenges in physiological monitoring

Sufficient evidence exists from laboratory studies to suggest that physiological measures can be useful as an adjunct to behavioral and subjective measures of human performance and capabilities. Thus it is reasonable to address the conceptual and engineering challenges that arise in applying this technology in operational settings. Issues reviewed include the advantages and disadvantages of constructs such as mental states, the need for physiological measures of performance, areas of application for physiological measures in operational settings, which measures appear to be most useful, problem areas that arise in the use of these measures in operational settings, and directions for future development