The Meandering Current Mobility Model and its impact on Underwater Mobile Sensor Networks

Underwater mobile acoustic sensor networks are promising tools for the exploration of the oceans. These networks require new robust solutions for fundamental issues such as: localization service for data tagging and networking protocols for communication. All these tasks are closely related with connectivity, coverage and deployment of the network. A realistic mobility model that can capture the physical movement of the sensor nodes with ocean currents gives better understanding on the above problems. In this paper, we propose a novel physically-inspired mobility model which is representative of underwater environments. We study how the model affects a range-based localization protocol, and its impact on the coverage and connectivity of the network under different deployment scenarios

Adoption of vehicular ad hoc networking protocols by networked robots

This paper focuses on the utilization of wireless networking in the robotics domain. Many researchers have already equipped their robots with wireless communication capabilities, stimulated by the observation that multi-robot systems tend to have several advantages over their single-robot counterparts. Typically, this integration of wireless communication is tackled in a quite pragmatic manner, only a few authors presented novel Robotic Ad Hoc Network (RANET) protocols that were designed specifically with robotic use cases in mind. This is in sharp contrast with the domain of vehicular ad hoc networks (VANET). This observation is the starting point of this paper. If the results of previous efforts focusing on VANET protocols could be reused in the RANET domain, this could lead to rapid progress in the field of networked robots. To investigate this possibility, this paper provides a thorough overview of the related work in the domain of robotic and vehicular ad hoc networks. Based on this information, an exhaustive list of requirements is defined for both types. It is concluded that the most significant difference lies in the fact that VANET protocols are oriented towards low throughput messaging, while RANET protocols have to support high throughput media streaming as well. Although not always with equal importance, all other defined requirements are valid for both protocols. This leads to the conclusion that cross-fertilization between them is an appealing approach for future RANET research. To support such developments, this paper concludes with the definition of an appropriate working plan

Smart Wireless Sensor Networks

The recent development of communication and sensor technology results in the growth of a new attractive and challenging area - wireless sensor networks (WSNs). A wireless sensor network which consists of a large number of sensor nodes is deployed in environmental fields to serve various applications. Facilitated with the ability of wireless communication and intelligent computation, these nodes become smart sensors which do not only perceive ambient physical parameters but also be able to process information, cooperate with each other and self-organize into the network. These new features assist the sensor nodes as well as the network to operate more efficiently in terms of both data acquisition and energy consumption. Special purposes of the applications require design and operation of WSNs different from conventional networks such as the internet. The network design must take into account of the objectives of specific applications. The nature of deployed environment must be considered. The limited of sensor nodes� resources such as memory, computational ability, communication bandwidth and energy source are the challenges in network design. A smart wireless sensor network must be able to deal with these constraints as well as to guarantee the connectivity, coverage, reliability and security of network's operation for a maximized lifetime. This book discusses various aspects of designing such smart wireless sensor networks. Main topics includes: design methodologies, network protocols and algorithms, quality of service management, coverage optimization, time synchronization and security techniques for sensor networks

Internet of robotic things : converging sensing/actuating, hypoconnectivity, artificial intelligence and IoT Platforms

The Internet of Things (IoT) concept is evolving rapidly and influencing newdevelopments in various application domains, such as the Internet of MobileThings (IoMT), Autonomous Internet of Things (A-IoT), Autonomous Systemof Things (ASoT), Internet of Autonomous Things (IoAT), Internetof Things Clouds (IoT-C) and the Internet of Robotic Things (IoRT) etc.that are progressing/advancing by using IoT technology. The IoT influencerepresents new development and deployment challenges in different areassuch as seamless platform integration, context based cognitive network integration,new mobile sensor/actuator network paradigms, things identification(addressing, naming in IoT) and dynamic things discoverability and manyothers. The IoRT represents new convergence challenges and their need to be addressed, in one side the programmability and the communication ofmultiple heterogeneous mobile/autonomous/robotic things for cooperating,their coordination, configuration, exchange of information, security, safetyand protection. Developments in IoT heterogeneous parallel processing/communication and dynamic systems based on parallelism and concurrencyrequire new ideas for integrating the intelligent “devices”, collaborativerobots (COBOTS), into IoT applications. Dynamic maintainability, selfhealing,self-repair of resources, changing resource state, (re-) configurationand context based IoT systems for service implementation and integrationwith IoT network service composition are of paramount importance whennew “cognitive devices” are becoming active participants in IoT applications.This chapter aims to be an overview of the IoRT concept, technologies,architectures and applications and to provide a comprehensive coverage offuture challenges, developments and applications

A distributed approach to underwater acoustic communications

Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution September 2003A novel distributed underwater acoustic networking (UAN) protocol suitable for ad-hoc deployments of both stationary and mobile nodes dispersed across a relatively wide coverage area is presented. Nodes are dynamically clustered in a distributed manner based on the estimated position of one-hop neighbor nodes within a shallow water environment. The spatial dynamic cellular clustering scheme allows scalable communication resource allocation and channel reuse similar in design to land-based cellular architectures, except devoid of the need for a centralized controlling infrastructure. Simulation results demonstrate that relatively high degrees of interference immunity, network connectivity, and network stability can be achieved despite the severe limitations of the underwater acoustic channel

Underwater Sensor Nodes and Networks

Sensor technology has matured enough to be used in any type of environment. The appearance of new physical sensors has increased the range of environmental parameters for gathering data. Because of the huge amount of unexploited resources in the ocean environment, there is a need of new research in the field of sensors and sensor networks. This special issue is focused on collecting recent advances on underwater sensors and underwater sensor networks in order to measure, monitor, surveillance of and control of underwater environments. On the one hand, from the sensor node perspective, we will see works related with the deployment of physical sensors, development of sensor nodes and transceivers for sensor nodes, sensor measurement analysis and several issues such as layer 1 and 2 protocols for underwater communication and sensor localization and positioning systems. On the other hand, from the sensor network perspective, we will see several architectures and protocols for underwater environments and analysis concerning sensor network measurements. Both sides will provide us a complete view of last scientific advances in this research field.Lloret, J. (2013). Underwater Sensor Nodes and Networks. Sensors. 13(9):11782-11796. doi:10.3390/s130911782S1178211796139Garcia, M., Sendra, S., Lloret, G., & Lloret, J. (2011). Monitoring and control sensor system for fish feeding in marine fish farms. IET Communications, 5(12), 1682-1690. doi:10.1049/iet-com.2010.0654Martinez, J. J., Myers, J. R., Carlson, T. J., Deng, Z. D., Rohrer, J. S., Caviggia, K. A., … Weiland, M. A. (2011). Design and Implementation of an Underwater Sound Recording Device. Sensors, 11(9), 8519-8535. doi:10.3390/s110908519Ardid, M., Martínez-Mora, J. A., Bou-Cabo, M., Larosa, G., Adrián-Martínez, S., & Llorens, C. D. (2012). Acoustic Transmitters for Underwater Neutrino Telescopes. Sensors, 12(4), 4113-4132. doi:10.3390/s120404113Baronti, F., Fantechi, G., Roncella, R., & Saletti, R. (2012). Wireless Sensor Node for Surface Seawater Density Measurements. Sensors, 12(3), 2954-2968. doi:10.3390/s120302954Mànuel, A., Roset, X., Rio, J. D., Toma, D. M., Carreras, N., Panahi, S. S., … Cadena, J. (2012). Ocean Bottom Seismometer: Design and Test of a Measurement System for Marine Seismology. Sensors, 12(3), 3693-3719. doi:10.3390/s120303693Jollymore, A., Johnson, M. S., & Hawthorne, I. (2012). Submersible UV-Vis Spectroscopy for Quantifying Streamwater Organic Carbon Dynamics: Implementation and Challenges before and after Forest Harvest in a Headwater Stream. Sensors, 12(4), 3798-3813. doi:10.3390/s120403798Won, T.-H., & Park, S.-J. (2012). Design and Implementation of an Omni-Directional Underwater Acoustic Micro-Modem Based on a Low-Power Micro-Controller Unit. Sensors, 12(2), 2309-2323. doi:10.3390/s120202309Sánchez, A., Blanc, S., Yuste, P., Perles, A., & Serrano, J. J. (2012). An Ultra-Low Power and Flexible Acoustic Modem Design to Develop Energy-Efficient Underwater Sensor Networks. Sensors, 12(6), 6837-6856. doi:10.3390/s120606837Shin, S.-Y., & Park, S.-H. (2011). A Cost Effective Block Framing Scheme for Underwater Communication. Sensors, 11(12), 11717-11735. doi:10.3390/s111211717Kim, Y., & Park, S.-H. (2011). A Query Result Merging Scheme for Providing Energy Efficiency in Underwater Sensor Networks. Sensors, 11(12), 11833-11855. doi:10.3390/s111211833Llor, J., & Malumbres, M. P. (2012). Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks: How Do Acoustic Propagation Models Impact the Performance of Higher-Level Protocols? Sensors, 12(2), 1312-1335. doi:10.3390/s120201312Zhang, G., Hovem, J. M., & Dong, H. (2012). Experimental Assessment of Different Receiver Structures for Underwater Acoustic Communications over Multipath Channels. Sensors, 12(2), 2118-2135. doi:10.3390/s120202118Ramezani, H., & Leus, G. (2012). Ranging in an Underwater Medium with Multiple Isogradient Sound Speed Profile Layers. Sensors, 12(3), 2996-3017. doi:10.3390/s120302996Lloret, J., Sendra, S., Ardid, M., & Rodrigues, J. J. P. C. (2012). Underwater Wireless Sensor Communications in the 2.4 GHz ISM Frequency Band. Sensors, 12(4), 4237-4264. doi:10.3390/s120404237Gao, M., Foh, C. H., & Cai, J. (2012). On the Selection of Transmission Range in Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks. Sensors, 12(4), 4715-4729. doi:10.3390/s120404715Gómez, J. V., Sandnes, F. E., & Fernández, B. (2012). Sunlight Intensity Based Global Positioning System for Near-Surface Underwater Sensors. Sensors, 12(2), 1930-1949. doi:10.3390/s120201930Han, G., Jiang, J., Shu, L., Xu, Y., & Wang, F. (2012). Localization Algorithms of Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey. Sensors, 12(2), 2026-2061. doi:10.3390/s120202026Moradi, M., Rezazadeh, J., & Ismail, A. S. (2012). A Reverse Localization Scheme for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks. Sensors, 12(4), 4352-4380. doi:10.3390/s120404352Lee, S., & Kim, K. (2012). Localization with a Mobile Beacon in Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks. Sensors, 12(5), 5486-5501. doi:10.3390/s120505486Mohamed, N., Jawhar, I., Al-Jaroodi, J., & Zhang, L. (2011). Sensor Network Architectures for Monitoring Underwater Pipelines. Sensors, 11(11), 10738-10764. doi:10.3390/s111110738Macias, E., Suarez, A., Chiti, F., Sacco, A., & Fantacci, R. (2011). A Hierarchical Communication Architecture for Oceanic Surveillance Applications. Sensors, 11(12), 11343-11356. doi:10.3390/s111211343Zhang, S., Yu, J., Zhang, A., Yang, L., & Shu, Y. (2012). Marine Vehicle Sensor Network Architecture and Protocol Designs for Ocean Observation. Sensors, 12(1), 373-390. doi:10.3390/s120100373Climent, S., Capella, J. V., Meratnia, N., & Serrano, J. J. (2012). Underwater Sensor Networks: A New Energy Efficient and Robust Architecture. Sensors, 12(1), 704-731. doi:10.3390/s120100704Min, H., Cho, Y., & Heo, J. (2012). Enhancing the Reliability of Head Nodes in Underwater Sensor Networks. Sensors, 12(2), 1194-1210. doi:10.3390/s120201194Yoon, S., Azad, A. K., Oh, H., & Kim, S. (2012). AURP: An AUV-Aided Underwater Routing Protocol for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks. Sensors, 12(2), 1827-1845. doi:10.3390/s120201827Caiti, A., Calabrò, V., Dini, G., Lo Duca, A., & Munafò, A. (2012). Secure Cooperation of Autonomous Mobile Sensors Using an Underwater Acoustic Network. Sensors, 12(2), 1967-1989. doi:10.3390/s120201967Wu, H., Chen, M., & Guan, X. (2012). A Network Coding Based Routing Protocol for Underwater Sensor Networks. Sensors, 12(4), 4559-4577. doi:10.3390/s120404559Navarro, G., Huertas, I. E., Costas, E., Flecha, S., Díez-Minguito, M., Caballero, I., … Ruiz, J. (2012). Use of a Real-Time Remote Monitoring Network (RTRM) to Characterize the Guadalquivir Estuary (Spain). Sensors, 12(2), 1398-1421. doi:10.3390/s120201398Baladrón, C., Aguiar, J. M., Calavia, L., Carro, B., Sánchez-Esguevillas, A., & Hernández, L. (2012). Performance Study of the Application of Artificial Neural Networks to the Completion and Prediction of Data Retrieved by Underwater Sensors. Sensors, 12(2), 1468-1481. doi:10.3390/s12020146

Integration of LoRa Wide Area Network with the 5G Test Network

Abstract. The global communication network is going through major transformation from conventional to more versatile and diversified network approaches. With the advent of virtualization and cloud technology, information technology (IT) is merging with telecommunications to alter the conventional approaches of traditional proprietary networking techniques. From radio to network and applications, the existing infrastructure lacks several features that we wished to be part of 5th Generation Mobile Networks (5G). Having a support for large number of applications, Internet of Things (IoT) will bring a major evolution by creating a comfortable, flexible and an automated environment for end users. A network having the capability to support radio protocols on top of basic networking protocols, when blended with a platform which can generate IoT use cases, can make the expectations of 5G a reality. Low Power Wide Area Network (LPWAN) technologies can be utilized with other emerging and suitable technologies for IoT applications. To implement a network where all the technologies can be deployed virtually to serve their applications within a single cloud, Network Functions Virtualization (NFV) and Software Defined Network (SDN) is introduced to implement such a networking possibility for upcoming technologies. The 5G Test Network (5GTN), a testbed for implementing and testing 5G features in real time, is deployed in virtual platform which allows to add other technologies for IoT applications. To implement a network with an IoT enabler technology, LoRa Wide Area Network (LoRaWAN) technology can be integrated to test the feasibility and capability of IoT implications. LoRaWAN being an IoT enabler technology is chosen out of several possibilities to be integrated with the 5GTN. Using MultiConnect Conduit as a gateway, the integration is realized by establishing point to point protocol (PPP) connection with eNodeB. Once the connection is established, LoRa packets are forwarded to the ThingWorx IoT cloud and responses can be received by the end-devices from that IoT cloud by using Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) protocol. Wireshark, an open source packet analyser, is then used to ensure successful transmission of packets to the ThingWorx using the 5GTN default packet routes