7,401 research outputs found
Online Mixed Packing and Covering
In many problems, the inputs arrive over time, and must be dealt with
irrevocably when they arrive. Such problems are online problems. A common
method of solving online problems is to first solve the corresponding linear
program, and then round the fractional solution online to obtain an integral
solution.
We give algorithms for solving linear programs with mixed packing and
covering constraints online. We first consider mixed packing and covering
linear programs, where packing constraints are given offline and covering
constraints are received online. The objective is to minimize the maximum
multiplicative factor by which any packing constraint is violated, while
satisfying the covering constraints. No prior sublinear competitive algorithms
are known for this problem. We give the first such --- a
polylogarithmic-competitive algorithm for solving mixed packing and covering
linear programs online. We also show a nearly tight lower bound.
Our techniques for the upper bound use an exponential penalty function in
conjunction with multiplicative updates. While exponential penalty functions
are used previously to solve linear programs offline approximately, offline
algorithms know the constraints beforehand and can optimize greedily. In
contrast, when constraints arrive online, updates need to be more complex.
We apply our techniques to solve two online fixed-charge problems with
congestion. These problems are motivated by applications in machine scheduling
and facility location. The linear program for these problems is more
complicated than mixed packing and covering, and presents unique challenges. We
show that our techniques combined with a randomized rounding procedure give
polylogarithmic-competitive integral solutions. These problems generalize
online set-cover, for which there is a polylogarithmic lower bound. Hence, our
results are close to tight
New Results on Online Resource Minimization
We consider the online resource minimization problem in which jobs with hard
deadlines arrive online over time at their release dates. The task is to
determine a feasible schedule on a minimum number of machines. We rigorously
study this problem and derive various algorithms with small constant
competitive ratios for interesting restricted problem variants. As the most
important special case, we consider scheduling jobs with agreeable deadlines.
We provide the first constant ratio competitive algorithm for the
non-preemptive setting, which is of particular interest with regard to the
known strong lower bound of n for the general problem. For the preemptive
setting, we show that the natural algorithm LLF achieves a constant ratio for
agreeable jobs, while for general jobs it has a lower bound of Omega(n^(1/3)).
We also give an O(log n)-competitive algorithm for the general preemptive
problem, which improves upon the known O(p_max/p_min)-competitive algorithm.
Our algorithm maintains a dynamic partition of the job set into loose and tight
jobs and schedules each (temporal) subset individually on separate sets of
machines. The key is a characterization of how the decrease in the relative
laxity of jobs influences the optimum number of machines. To achieve this we
derive a compact expression of the optimum value, which might be of independent
interest. We complement the general algorithmic result by showing lower bounds
that rule out that other known algorithms may yield a similar performance
guarantee
- …