95,803 research outputs found

    Midbrain areas as candidates for audio-vocal interface in echolocating bats

    Get PDF

    Measurement of electron screening in muonic lead

    Get PDF
    Energies of the transitions between high-lying (n≥6) states of muonic lead were accurately determined. The results are interpreted as a ∼2% test of the electron screening. The agreement between experiment and theory is good if it is assumed that the refilling of the electron K shell is fast. The present results furthermore severely restrict possible ionization of the electron L shell

    The power of linear programming for general-valued CSPs

    Full text link
    Let DD, called the domain, be a fixed finite set and let Γ\Gamma, called the valued constraint language, be a fixed set of functions of the form f:Dm→Q∪{∞}f:D^m\to\mathbb{Q}\cup\{\infty\}, where different functions might have different arity mm. We study the valued constraint satisfaction problem parametrised by Γ\Gamma, denoted by VCSP(Γ)(\Gamma). These are minimisation problems given by nn variables and the objective function given by a sum of functions from Γ\Gamma, each depending on a subset of the nn variables. Finite-valued constraint languages contain functions that take on only rational values and not infinite values. Our main result is a precise algebraic characterisation of valued constraint languages whose instances can be solved exactly by the basic linear programming relaxation (BLP). For a valued constraint language Γ\Gamma, BLP is a decision procedure for Γ\Gamma if and only if Γ\Gamma admits a symmetric fractional polymorphism of every arity. For a finite-valued constraint language Γ\Gamma, BLP is a decision procedure if and only if Γ\Gamma admits a symmetric fractional polymorphism of some arity, or equivalently, if Γ\Gamma admits a symmetric fractional polymorphism of arity 2. Using these results, we obtain tractability of several novel classes of problems, including problems over valued constraint languages that are: (1) submodular on arbitrary lattices; (2) kk-submodular on arbitrary finite domains; (3) weakly (and hence strongly) tree-submodular on arbitrary trees.Comment: A full version of a FOCS'12 paper by the last two authors (arXiv:1204.1079) and an ICALP'13 paper by the first author (arXiv:1207.7213) to appear in SIAM Journal on Computing (SICOMP

    Office Technology

    Get PDF
    • …
    corecore