Bounded single-machine parallel-batch scheduling with release dates and rejection

Author name used in this publication: T. C. E. Cheng2008-2009 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journalAccepted ManuscriptPublishe

Order Acceptance and Scheduling: A Taxonomy and Review

Over the past 20 years, the topic of order acceptance has attracted considerable attention from those who study scheduling and those who practice it. In a firm that strives to align its functions so that profit is maximized, the coordination of capacity with demand may require that business sometimes be turned away. In particular, there is a trade-off between the revenue brought in by a particular order, and all of its associated costs of processing. The present study focuses on the body of research that approaches this trade-off by considering two decisions: which orders to accept for processing, and how to schedule them. This paper presents a taxonomy and a review of this literature, catalogs its contributions and suggests opportunities for future research in this area

Batch Scheduling with Proportional-Linear Deterioration and Outsourcing

We consider the bounded parallel-batch scheduling with proportional-linear deterioration and outsourcing, in which the actual processing time is pj=αj(A+Dt) or pj=αjt. A job is either accepted and processed in batches on a single machine by manufactures themselves or outsourced to the third party with a certain penalty having to be paid. The objective is to minimize the maximum completion time of the accepted jobs and the total penalty of the outsourced jobs. For the pj=αj(A+Dt) model, when all the jobs are released at time zero, we show that the problem is NP-hard and present a pseudo-polynomial time algorithm, respectively. For the pj=αjt model, when the jobs have distinct m (<n) release dates, we provide a dynamic programming algorithm, where n is the number of jobs

Serial-batch scheduling – the special case of laser-cutting machines

The dissertation deals with a problem in the field of short-term production planning, namely the scheduling of laser-cutting machines. The object of decision is the grouping of production orders (batching) and the sequencing of these order groups on one or more machines (scheduling). This problem is also known in the literature as "batch scheduling problem" and belongs to the class of combinatorial optimization problems due to the interdependencies between the batching and the scheduling decisions. The concepts and methods used are mainly from production planning, operations research and machine learning

Project portfolio management: capacity allocation, downsizing decisions and sequencing rules.

This paper aims to gain insight into capacity allocation, downsizing decisions and sequencing rules when managing a portfolio of projects. By downsizing, we mean reducing the scale or size of a project and thereby changing the project's content. In previous work, we have determined the amount of critical capacity that is optimally allocated to concurrently executed projects with deterministic or stochastic workloads when the impact of downsizing is known. In this paper, we extend this view with the possibility of sequential processing, which implies that a complete order is imposed on the projects. When projects are sequenced instead of executed in parallel, two effects come into play: firstly, unused capacity can be shifted to later projects in the same period; and secondly, reinvestment revenues gain importance because of the differences in realization time of the sequenced projects. When project workloads are known, only the second effect counts; when project workloads are stochastic, however, the project's capacity usage is uncertain so that unused capacity can be shifted to later projects in the same period. In this case, both effects need to be taken into account. In this paper, we determine optimal sequencing rules when the selection and capacity-allocation decisions for a set of projects have already been made. We also consider a combination of parallel and sequential planning and we perform simulation experiments that confirm the appropriateness of our capacity-allocation methods.Project portfolio management; Downsizing; Sequencing;

Order acceptance and scheduling in a single-machine environment: exact and heuristic algorithms.

In this paper, we develop exact and heuristic algorithms for the order acceptance and scheduling problem in a single-machine environment. We consider the case where a pool consisting of firm planned orders as well as potential orders is available from which an over-demanded company can select. The capacity available for processing the accepted orders is limited and orders are characterized by known processing times, delivery dates, revenues and the weight representing a penalty per unit-time delay beyond the delivery date promised to the customer. We prove the non-approximability of the problem and give two linear formulations that we solve with CPLEX. We devise two exact branch-and-bound procedures able to solve problem instances of practical dimensions. For the solution of large instances, we propose six heuristics. We provide a comparison and comments on the efficiency and quality of the results obtained using both the exact and heuristic algorithms, including the solution of the linear formulations using CPLEX.Order acceptance; Scheduling; Single machine; Branch-and-bound; Heuristics; Firm planned orders;

Advances and Novel Approaches in Discrete Optimization

Discrete optimization is an important area of Applied Mathematics with a broad spectrum of applications in many fields. This book results from a Special Issue in the journal Mathematics entitled ‘Advances and Novel Approaches in Discrete Optimization’. It contains 17 articles covering a broad spectrum of subjects which have been selected from 43 submitted papers after a thorough refereeing process. Among other topics, it includes seven articles dealing with scheduling problems, e.g., online scheduling, batching, dual and inverse scheduling problems, or uncertain scheduling problems. Other subjects are graphs and applications, evacuation planning, the max-cut problem, capacitated lot-sizing, and packing algorithms

Optimization Models and Approximate Algorithms for the Aerial Refueling Scheduling and Rescheduling Problems

The Aerial Refueling Scheduling Problem (ARSP) can be defined as determining the refueling completion times for fighter aircrafts (jobs) on multiple tankers (machines) to minimize the total weighted tardiness. ARSP can be modeled as a parallel machine scheduling with release times and due date-to-deadline window. ARSP assumes that the jobs have different release times, due dates, and due date-to-deadline windows between the refueling due date and a deadline to return without refueling. The Aerial Refueling Rescheduling Problem (ARRP), on the other hand, can be defined as updating the existing AR schedule after being disrupted by job related events including the arrival of new aircrafts, departure of an existing aircrafts, and changes in aircraft priorities. ARRP is formulated as a multiobjective optimization problem by minimizing the total weighted tardiness (schedule quality) and schedule instability. Both ARSP and ARRP are formulated as mixed integer programming models. The objective function in ARSP is a piecewise tardiness cost that takes into account due date-to-deadline windows and job priorities. Since ARSP is NP-hard, four approximate algorithms are proposed to obtain solutions in reasonable computational times, namely (1) apparent piecewise tardiness cost with release time rule (APTCR), (2) simulated annealing starting from random solution (SArandom ), (3) SA improving the initial solution constructed by APTCR (SAAPTCR), and (4) Metaheuristic for Randomized Priority Search (MetaRaPS). Additionally, five regeneration and partial repair algorithms (MetaRE, BestINSERT, SEPRE, LSHIFT, and SHUFFLE) were developed for ARRP to update instantly the current schedule at the disruption time. The proposed heuristic algorithms are tested in terms of solution quality and CPU time through computational experiments with randomly generated data to represent AR operations and disruptions. Effectiveness of the scheduling and rescheduling algorithms are compared to optimal solutions for problems with up to 12 jobs and to each other for larger problems with up to 60 jobs. The results show that, APTCR is more likely to outperform SArandom especially when the problem size increases, although it has significantly worse performance than SA in terms of deviation from optimal solution for small size problems. Moreover CPU time performance of APTCR is significantly better than SA in both cases. MetaRaPS is more likely to outperform SAAPTCR in terms of average error from optimal solutions for both small and large size problems. Results for small size problems show that MetaRaPS algorithm is more robust compared to SAAPTCR. However, CPU time performance of SA is significantly better than MetaRaPS in both cases. ARRP experiments were conducted with various values of objective weighting factor for extended analysis. In the job arrival case, MetaRE and BestINSERT have significantly performed better than SEPRE in terms of average relative error for small size problems. In the case of job priority disruption, there is no significant difference between MetaRE, BestINSERT, and SHUFFLE algorithms. MetaRE has significantly performed better than LSHIFT to repair job departure disruptions and significantly superior to the BestINSERT algorithm in terms of both relative error and computational time for large size problems

New utilization criteria for online scheduling

In the classical scheduling problems, it has been assumed that complete knowledge of the problem was available when it was to be solved. However, scheduling problems in the real world face the possibility of the lack of the knowledge. Uncertainties frequently encountered in scheduling environments include the appearance of new jobs and unknown processing times. In this work, we take into account these realistic issues. This thesis deals with the problem of non-preemptive scheduling independent jobs on m identical parallel machines. In our online model, the jobs are submitted over time non-clairvoyantly. Therefore, the processing times of the jobs are unknown until they complete. Further, we assume that the ratio of weight to processing time is equal for all jobs, that is, all jobs have the same priorities. The jobs are assigned to the machines in a nondelay fashion. Our main scheduling objective is to maximize the utilization of the system. We show that the commonly used makespan criterion usually cannot reflect the true utilization of this kind of online scheduling problems. For this reason, it is very important to find another criterion capable of evaluating system utilization. Therefore, we introduce two new alternative criteria that more accurately capture the utilization of the machines. Moreover, we derive competitive factors for both criteria. Those competitive factors are tight for one criterion and almost tight for the other. Finally, we present an experimental investigation to evaluate the performance of the nondelay online algorithm with respect to our criteria. The experimental results show the confirmation of our theoretical results