Rational, recognizable, and aperiodic sets in the partially lossy queue monoid

Partially lossy queue monoids (or plq monoids) model the behavior of queues that can forget arbitrary parts of their content. While many decision problems on recognizable subsets in the plq monoid are decidable, most of them are undecidable if the sets are rational. In particular, in this monoid the classes of rational and recognizable subsets do not coincide. By restricting multiplication and iteration in the construction of rational sets and by allowing complementation we obtain precisely the class of recognizable sets. From these special rational expressions we can obtain an MSO logic describing the recognizable subsets. Moreover, we provide similar results for the class of aperiodic subsets in the plq monoid

Rational, Recognizable, and Aperiodic Sets in the Partially Lossy Queue Monoid

Partially lossy queue monoids (or plq monoids) model the behavior of queues that can forget arbitrary parts of their content. While many decision problems on recognizable subsets in the plq monoid are decidable, most of them are undecidable if the sets are rational. In particular, in this monoid the classes of rational and recognizable subsets do not coincide. By restricting multiplication and iteration in the construction of rational sets and by allowing complementation we obtain precisely the class of recognizable sets. From these special rational expressions we can obtain an MSO logic describing the recognizable subsets. Moreover, we provide similar results for the class of aperiodic subsets in the plq monoid

26. Theorietag Automaten und Formale Sprachen 23. Jahrestagung Logik in der Informatik: Tagungsband

Der Theorietag ist die Jahrestagung der Fachgruppe Automaten und Formale Sprachen der Gesellschaft für Informatik und fand erstmals 1991 in Magdeburg statt. Seit dem Jahr 1996 wird der Theorietag von einem eintägigen Workshop mit eingeladenen Vorträgen begleitet. Die Jahrestagung der Fachgruppe Logik in der Informatik der Gesellschaft für Informatik fand erstmals 1993 in Leipzig statt. Im Laufe beider Jahrestagungen finden auch die jährliche Fachgruppensitzungen statt. In diesem Jahr wird der Theorietag der Fachgruppe Automaten und Formale Sprachen erstmalig zusammen mit der Jahrestagung der Fachgruppe Logik in der Informatik abgehalten. Organisiert wurde die gemeinsame Veranstaltung von der Arbeitsgruppe Zuverlässige Systeme des Instituts für Informatik an der Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel vom 4. bis 7. Oktober im Tagungshotel Tannenfelde bei Neumünster. Während des Tre↵ens wird ein Workshop für alle Interessierten statt finden. In Tannenfelde werden • Christoph Löding (Aachen) • Tomás Masopust (Dresden) • Henning Schnoor (Kiel) • Nicole Schweikardt (Berlin) • Georg Zetzsche (Paris) eingeladene Vorträge zu ihrer aktuellen Arbeit halten. Darüber hinaus werden 26 Vorträge von Teilnehmern und Teilnehmerinnen gehalten, 17 auf dem Theorietag Automaten und formale Sprachen und neun auf der Jahrestagung Logik in der Informatik. Der vorliegende Band enthält Kurzfassungen aller Beiträge. Wir danken der Gesellschaft für Informatik, der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel und dem Tagungshotel Tannenfelde für die Unterstützung dieses Theorietags. Ein besonderer Dank geht an das Organisationsteam: Maike Bradler, Philipp Sieweck, Joel Day. Kiel, Oktober 2016 Florin Manea, Dirk Nowotka und Thomas Wilk

Logic -\u3e Proof -\u3e REST

REST is a common architecture for networked applications. Applications that adhere to the REST constraints enjoy significant scaling advantages over other architectures. But REST is not a panacea for the task of building correct software. Algebraic models of computation, particularly CSP, prove useful to describe the composition of applications using REST. CSP enables us to describe and verify the behavior of RESTful systems. The descriptions of each component can be used independently to verify that a system behaves as expected. This thesis demonstrates and develops CSP methodology to verify the behavior of RESTful applications

The Cayley-graph of the queue monoid: logic and decidability

We investigate the decidability of logical aspects of graphs that arise as Cayley-graphs of the so-called queue monoids. These monoids model the behavior of the classical (reliable) fifo-queues. We answer a question raised by Huschenbett, Kuske, and Zetzsche and prove the decidability of the first-order theory of these graphs with the help of an - at least for the authors - new combination of the well-known method from Ferrante and Rackoff and an automata-based approach. On the other hand, we prove that the monadic second-order of the queue monoid's Cayley-graph is undecidable

Verification of Automata with Storage Mechanisms

An important question in computer science is to ask, whether a given system conforms to a specification. Often this question is equivalent to ask whether a finite automaton with certain memory like a stack or queue can reach some given state. In this thesis we focus this reachability problem of automata having one or more lossy or reliable stacks or queues as their memory. Unfortunately, the reachability problem is undecidable or of high complexity in most of these cases. We circumvent this by several approximation methods. So we extend the exploration algorithm by Boigelot and Godefroid under-approximating the reachability problem of queue automata. We also study some automata having multiple stacks with a restricted behavior. These “asynchronous pushdown systems” have an efficiently decidable reachability problem. To show our results we first have to gain knowledge of several algebraic properties of the so-called transformation monoid of the studied storage mechanisms.An important research topic in computer science is the verification, i.e., the analysis of systems towards their correctness. This analysis consists of two parts: first we have to formalize the system and the desired properties. Afterwards we have to find algorithms to check whether the properties hold in the system. In many cases we can model the system as a finite automaton with a suitable storage mechanism, e.g., functional programs with recursive calls can be modeled as automata with a stack (or pushdown). Here, we consider automata with two variations of stacks and queues: 1. Partially lossy queues and stacks, which are allowed to forget some specified parts of their contents at any time. We are able to model unreliable systems with such memories. 2. Distributed queues and stacks, i.e., multiple such memories with a special synchronization in between. Often we can check the properties of our models by solving the reachability and recurrent reachability problems in our automata models. It is well-known that the decidability of these problems highly depends on the concrete data type of our automata’s memory. Both problems can be solved in polynomial time for automata with one stack. In contrast, these problems are undecidable if we attach a queue or at least two stacks to our automata. In some special cases we are still able to verify such systems. So, we will consider only special automata with multiple stacks - so-called asynchronous pushdown automata. These are multiple (local) automata each having one stack. Whenever these automata try to write something into at least one stack, we require a read action on these stacks right before these actions. We will see that the (recurrent) reachability problem is decidable for such asynchronous pushdown automata in polynomial time. We can also semi-decide the reachability problem of our queue automata by exploration of the configration space. To this end, we can join multiple consecutive transitions to so-called meta-transformations and simulate them at once. Here, we study meta-transformations alternating between writing words from a given regular language into the queues and reading words from another regular language from the queues. We will see that such metatransformations can be applied in polynomial time. To show this result we first study some algebraic properties of our stacks and queues.Ein wichtiges Forschungsthema in der Informatik ist die Verifikation, d.h., die Analyse von Systemen bezüglich ihrer Korrektheit. Diese Analyse erfolgt in zwei Schritten: Zuerst müssen wir das System und die gewünschten Eigenschaften formalisieren. Anschließend benötigen wir Algorithmen zum Testen, ob das System die Eigenschaften erfüllt. Oftmals können wir das Systemals endlichen Automaten mit geeignetem Speichermechanismus modellieren, z.B. rekursive Programme sind im Wesentlichen Automaten mit einem Stack. Hier betrachten wir Automaten mit zwei Varianten von Stacks und Queues: 1. Partiell vergessliche Stacks und Queues, welche bestimmte Teile ihrer Inhalte jederzeit vergessen können. Diese können für unzuverlässige Systeme verwendet werden. 2. Verteilte Stacks und Queues, d.h., mehrere Stacks und Queues mit vordefinierter Synchronisierung. Häufig lassen sich die Eigenschaften unserer Modelle mithilfe des (wiederholten) Erreichbarkeitsproblems in unseren Automaten lösen. Dabei ist bekannt, dass die Entscheidbarkeit dieser Probleme oftmals stark vom konkreten Datentyp des Speichers abhängt. Beide Probleme können für Automaten mit einem Stack in Polynomialzeit gelöst werden. Sie sind jedoch unentscheidbar, wenn wir Automaten mit einer Queue oder zwei Stacks betrachten. In bestimmten Spezialfällen sind aber dennoch in der Lage diese Systeme zu verifizieren. So können wir beispielsweise bestimmte Automaten mit mehreren Stacks betrachten - so genannte Asynchrone Kellerautomaten. Diese bestehen aus mehreren (lokalen) Automaten mit jeweils einem Stack. Wann immer diese Automaten etwas in mind. einen Stack schreiben, müssen sie unmittelbar zuvor von diesen Stacks etwas lesen. Das (wiederholte) Erreichbarkeitsproblem ist in asynchronen Kellerautomaten in Polynomialzeit entscheidbar. Wir können zudem das Erreichbarkeitsproblem von Queueautomaten durch Exploration des Konfigurationsraums semi-entscheiden. Hierzu können wir mehrere aufeinanderfolgende Transitionen zu so genannten Meta-Transformationen zusammenfassen und diese in einem Schritt simulieren. Hier betrachten wir Meta-Transformationen, die zwischen dem Lesen und Schreiben von Wörtern aus zwei gegebenen regulären Sprachen alternieren. Diese Meta-Transformationen können in Polynomialzeit ausgeführt werden. Für dieses Ergebnis müssen wir jedoch zunächst verschiedene algebraische Eigenschaften der Queues betrachten

An Automaton-Theoretic View of Algebraic Specifications

We compare two methods for software specification: algebraic specifications and automata. While algebraic specifications have been around since the 1970s and have been studied extensively, specification by automata is relatively new. Its origins are in another veteran method called trace assertions, which considers a software module as a set of traces, that is, a sequences of function executions. A module is specified by a set of canonical traces and an equivalence relation matching one of the canonical traces to each non-canonical trace. It has been recently shown that trace assertions is an equivalent method to specification by automata. In continuation of this work on trace assertions and automata, we study how automata compare with algebraic specifications. We prove that every specification using an automaton can be converted into an algebraic specification describing the same abstract data type. This conversion utilises a set of canonical words, representing states in the automaton. We next consider varieties of monoids as a heuristic for obtaining more concise algebraic specifications from automata. Finally, we discuss the opposite conversion of algebraic specifications into automata. We show that, while an automaton always exists for every abstract data type described by an algebraic specification, this automaton may not be finitely describable and therefore may not be considered as a viable method for software specification