10,269 research outputs found
Exploiting Polyhedral Symmetries in Social Choice
A large amount of literature in social choice theory deals with quantifying
the probability of certain election outcomes. One way of computing the
probability of a specific voting situation under the Impartial Anonymous
Culture assumption is via counting integral points in polyhedra. Here, Ehrhart
theory can help, but unfortunately the dimension and complexity of the involved
polyhedra grows rapidly with the number of candidates. However, if we exploit
available polyhedral symmetries, some computations become possible that
previously were infeasible. We show this in three well known examples:
Condorcet's paradox, Condorcet efficiency of plurality voting and in Plurality
voting vs Plurality Runoff.Comment: 14 pages; with minor improvements; to be published in Social Choice
and Welfar
X THEN X: Manipulation of Same-System Runoff Elections
Do runoff elections, using the same voting rule as the initial election but
just on the winning candidates, increase or decrease the complexity of
manipulation? Does allowing revoting in the runoff increase or decrease the
complexity relative to just having a runoff without revoting? For both weighted
and unweighted voting, we show that even for election systems with simple
winner problems the complexity of manipulation, manipulation with runoffs, and
manipulation with revoting runoffs are independent, in the abstract. On the
other hand, for some important, well-known election systems we determine what
holds for each of these cases. For no such systems do we find runoffs lowering
complexity, and for some we find that runoffs raise complexity. Ours is the
first paper to show that for natural, unweighted election systems, runoffs can
increase the manipulation complexity
Fair Knapsack
We study the following multiagent variant of the knapsack problem. We are
given a set of items, a set of voters, and a value of the budget; each item is
endowed with a cost and each voter assigns to each item a certain value. The
goal is to select a subset of items with the total cost not exceeding the
budget, in a way that is consistent with the voters' preferences. Since the
preferences of the voters over the items can vary significantly, we need a way
of aggregating these preferences, in order to select the socially best valid
knapsack. We study three approaches to aggregating voters' preferences, which
are motivated by the literature on multiwinner elections and fair allocation.
This way we introduce the concepts of individually best, diverse, and fair
knapsack. We study the computational complexity (including parameterized
complexity, and complexity under restricted domains) of the aforementioned
multiagent variants of knapsack.Comment: Extended abstract will appear in Proc. of 33rd AAAI 201
- …