7,803 research outputs found
Computer-Assisted Program Reasoning Based on a Relational Semantics of Programs
We present an approach to program reasoning which inserts between a program
and its verification conditions an additional layer, the denotation of the
program expressed in a declarative form. The program is first translated into
its denotation from which subsequently the verification conditions are
generated. However, even before (and independently of) any verification
attempt, one may investigate the denotation itself to get insight into the
"semantic essence" of the program, in particular to see whether the denotation
indeed gives reason to believe that the program has the expected behavior.
Errors in the program and in the meta-information may thus be detected and
fixed prior to actually performing the formal verification. More concretely,
following the relational approach to program semantics, we model the effect of
a program as a binary relation on program states. A formal calculus is devised
to derive from a program a logic formula that describes this relation and is
subject for inspection and manipulation. We have implemented this idea in a
comprehensive form in the RISC ProgramExplorer, a new program reasoning
environment for educational purposes which encompasses the previously developed
RISC ProofNavigator as an interactive proving assistant.Comment: In Proceedings THedu'11, arXiv:1202.453
Formal Specification and Verification of JDK’s Identity Hash Map Implementation
Hash maps are a common and important data structure in efficient
algorithm implementations. Despite their wide-spread use, real-world
implementations are not regularly verified.
In this paper, we present the first case study of the \IHM class in
the Java JDK. We specified its behavior using the Java Modeling
Language (JML) and proved correctness for the main insertion and
lookup methods with \key, a semi-interactive theorem prover for
JML-annotated Java programs. Furthermore, we report how unit testing
and bounded model checking can be leveraged to find a suitable
specification more quickly. We also investigated where the
bottlenecks in the verification of hash maps lie for \key by
comparing required automatic proof effort for different hash map
implementations and draw conclusions for the choice of hash map
implementations regarding their verifiability
An Exercise in Invariant-based Programming with Interactive and Automatic Theorem Prover Support
Invariant-Based Programming (IBP) is a diagram-based correct-by-construction
programming methodology in which the program is structured around the
invariants, which are additionally formulated before the actual code. Socos is
a program construction and verification environment built specifically to
support IBP. The front-end to Socos is a graphical diagram editor, allowing the
programmer to construct invariant-based programs and check their correctness.
The back-end component of Socos, the program checker, computes the verification
conditions of the program and tries to prove them automatically. It uses the
theorem prover PVS and the SMT solver Yices to discharge as many of the
verification conditions as possible without user interaction. In this paper, we
first describe the Socos environment from a user and systems level perspective;
we then exemplify the IBP workflow by building a verified implementation of
heapsort in Socos. The case study highlights the role of both automatic and
interactive theorem proving in three sequential stages of the IBP workflow:
developing the background theory, formulating the program specification and
invariants, and proving the correctness of the final implementation.Comment: In Proceedings THedu'11, arXiv:1202.453
Trusting Computations: a Mechanized Proof from Partial Differential Equations to Actual Program
Computer programs may go wrong due to exceptional behaviors, out-of-bound
array accesses, or simply coding errors. Thus, they cannot be blindly trusted.
Scientific computing programs make no exception in that respect, and even bring
specific accuracy issues due to their massive use of floating-point
computations. Yet, it is uncommon to guarantee their correctness. Indeed, we
had to extend existing methods and tools for proving the correct behavior of
programs to verify an existing numerical analysis program. This C program
implements the second-order centered finite difference explicit scheme for
solving the 1D wave equation. In fact, we have gone much further as we have
mechanically verified the convergence of the numerical scheme in order to get a
complete formal proof covering all aspects from partial differential equations
to actual numerical results. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first
time such a comprehensive proof is achieved.Comment: N° RR-8197 (2012). arXiv admin note: text overlap with
arXiv:1112.179
- …