295 research outputs found

    Countable connected-homogeneous digraphs

    Full text link
    A digraph is connected-homogeneous if every isomorphism between two finite connected induced subdigraphs extends to an automorphism of the whole digraph. In this paper, we completely classify the countable connected-homogeneous digraphs.Comment: 49 page

    Homogeneous 2-partite digraphs

    Full text link
    We call a 2-partite digraph D homogeneous if every isomorphism between finite induced subdigraphs that respects the 2-partition of D extends to an automorphism of D that does the same. In this note, we classify the homogeneous 2-partite digraphs.Comment: 5 page

    Hamilton cycles in graphs and hypergraphs: an extremal perspective

    Full text link
    As one of the most fundamental and well-known NP-complete problems, the Hamilton cycle problem has been the subject of intensive research. Recent developments in the area have highlighted the crucial role played by the notions of expansion and quasi-randomness. These concepts and other recent techniques have led to the solution of several long-standing problems in the area. New aspects have also emerged, such as resilience, robustness and the study of Hamilton cycles in hypergraphs. We survey these developments and highlight open problems, with an emphasis on extremal and probabilistic approaches.Comment: to appear in the Proceedings of the ICM 2014; due to given page limits, this final version is slightly shorter than the previous arxiv versio

    Embedding large subgraphs into dense graphs

    Full text link
    What conditions ensure that a graph G contains some given spanning subgraph H? The most famous examples of results of this kind are probably Dirac's theorem on Hamilton cycles and Tutte's theorem on perfect matchings. Perfect matchings are generalized by perfect F-packings, where instead of covering all the vertices of G by disjoint edges, we want to cover G by disjoint copies of a (small) graph F. It is unlikely that there is a characterization of all graphs G which contain a perfect F-packing, so as in the case of Dirac's theorem it makes sense to study conditions on the minimum degree of G which guarantee a perfect F-packing. The Regularity lemma of Szemeredi and the Blow-up lemma of Komlos, Sarkozy and Szemeredi have proved to be powerful tools in attacking such problems and quite recently, several long-standing problems and conjectures in the area have been solved using these. In this survey, we give an outline of recent progress (with our main emphasis on F-packings, Hamiltonicity problems and tree embeddings) and describe some of the methods involved

    Tournaments, 4-uniform hypergraphs, and an exact extremal result

    Full text link
    We consider 44-uniform hypergraphs with the maximum number of hyperedges subject to the condition that every set of 55 vertices spans either 00 or exactly 22 hyperedges and give a construction, using quadratic residues, for an infinite family of such hypergraphs with the maximum number of hyperedges. Baber has previously given an asymptotically best-possible result using random tournaments. We give a connection between Baber's result and our construction via Paley tournaments and investigate a `switching' operation on tournaments that preserves hypergraphs arising from this construction.Comment: 23 pages, 6 figure

    Large unavoidable subtournaments

    Full text link
    Let DkD_k denote the tournament on 3k3k vertices consisting of three disjoint vertex classes V1,V2V_1, V_2 and V3V_3 of size kk, each of which is oriented as a transitive subtournament, and with edges directed from V1V_1 to V2V_2, from V2V_2 to V3V_3 and from V3V_3 to V1V_1. Fox and Sudakov proved that given a natural number kk and ϵ>0\epsilon > 0 there is n0(k,ϵ)n_0(k,\epsilon ) such that every tournament of order n0(k,ϵ)n_0(k,\epsilon ) which is ϵ\epsilon -far from being transitive contains DkD_k as a subtournament. Their proof showed that n0(k,ϵ)≤ϵ−O(k/ϵ2)n_0(k,\epsilon ) \leq \epsilon ^{-O(k/\epsilon ^2)} and they conjectured that this could be reduced to n0(k,ϵ)≤ϵ−O(k)n_0(k,\epsilon ) \leq \epsilon ^{-O(k)}. Here we prove this conjecture.Comment: 9 page
    • …
    corecore