926 research outputs found

    Entropy of eigenfunctions on quantum graphs

    Full text link
    We consider families of finite quantum graphs of increasing size and we are interested in how eigenfunctions are distributed over the graph. As a measure for the distribution of an eigenfunction on a graph we introduce the entropy, it has the property that a large value of the entropy of an eigenfunction implies that it cannot be localised on a small set on the graph. We then derive lower bounds for the entropy of eigenfunctions which depend on the topology of the graph and the boundary conditions at the vertices. The optimal bounds are obtained for expanders with large girth, the bounds are similar to the ones obtained by Anantharaman et.al. for eigenfunctions on manifolds of negative curvature, and are based on the entropic uncertainty principle. For comparison we compute as well the average behaviour of entropies on Neumann star graphs, where the entropies are much smaller. Finally we compare our lower bounds with numerical results for regular graphs and star graphs with different boundary conditions.Comment: 28 pages, 3 figure

    On graphs with cyclic defect or excess

    Get PDF
    The Moore bound constitutes both an upper bound on the order of a graph of maximum degree dd and diameter D=kD=k and a lower bound on the order of a graph of minimum degree dd and odd girth g=2k+1g=2k+1. Graphs missing or exceeding the Moore bound by ϵ\epsilon are called {\it graphs with defect or excess ϵ\epsilon}, respectively. While {\it Moore graphs} (graphs with ϵ=0\epsilon=0) and graphs with defect or excess 1 have been characterized almost completely, graphs with defect or excess 2 represent a wide unexplored area. Graphs with defect (excess) 2 satisfy the equation Gd,k(A)=Jn+BG_{d,k}(A) = J_n + B (Gd,k(A)=JnBG_{d,k}(A) = J_n-B), where AA denotes the adjacency matrix of the graph in question, nn its order, JnJ_n the n×nn\times n matrix whose entries are all 1's, BB the adjacency matrix of a union of vertex-disjoint cycles, and Gd,k(x)G_{d,k}(x) a polynomial with integer coefficients such that the matrix Gd,k(A)G_{d,k}(A) gives the number of paths of length at most kk joining each pair of vertices in the graph. In particular, if BB is the adjacency matrix of a cycle of order nn we call the corresponding graphs \emph{graphs with cyclic defect or excess}; these graphs are the subject of our attention in this paper. We prove the non-existence of infinitely many such graphs. As the highlight of the paper we provide the asymptotic upper bound of O(643d3/2)O(\frac{64}3d^{3/2}) for the number of graphs of odd degree d3d\ge3 and cyclic defect or excess. This bound is in fact quite generous, and as a way of illustration, we show the non-existence of some families of graphs of odd degree d3d\ge3 and cyclic defect or excess. Actually, we conjecture that, apart from the M\"obius ladder on 8 vertices, no non-trivial graph of any degree 3\ge 3 and cyclic defect or excess exists.Comment: 20 pages, 3 Postscript figure

    Geometric aspects of 2-walk-regular graphs

    Full text link
    A tt-walk-regular graph is a graph for which the number of walks of given length between two vertices depends only on the distance between these two vertices, as long as this distance is at most tt. Such graphs generalize distance-regular graphs and tt-arc-transitive graphs. In this paper, we will focus on 1- and in particular 2-walk-regular graphs, and study analogues of certain results that are important for distance regular graphs. We will generalize Delsarte's clique bound to 1-walk-regular graphs, Godsil's multiplicity bound and Terwilliger's analysis of the local structure to 2-walk-regular graphs. We will show that 2-walk-regular graphs have a much richer combinatorial structure than 1-walk-regular graphs, for example by proving that there are finitely many non-geometric 2-walk-regular graphs with given smallest eigenvalue and given diameter (a geometric graph is the point graph of a special partial linear space); a result that is analogous to a result on distance-regular graphs. Such a result does not hold for 1-walk-regular graphs, as our construction methods will show
    corecore