1,373 research outputs found
Vertex Disjoint Path in Upward Planar Graphs
The -vertex disjoint paths problem is one of the most studied problems in
algorithmic graph theory. In 1994, Schrijver proved that the problem can be
solved in polynomial time for every fixed when restricted to the class of
planar digraphs and it was a long standing open question whether it is
fixed-parameter tractable (with respect to parameter ) on this restricted
class. Only recently, \cite{CMPP}.\ achieved a major breakthrough and answered
the question positively. Despite the importance of this result (and the
brilliance of their proof), it is of rather theoretical importance. Their proof
technique is both technically extremely involved and also has at least double
exponential parameter dependence. Thus, it seems unrealistic that the algorithm
could actually be implemented. In this paper, therefore, we study a smaller
class of planar digraphs, the class of upward planar digraphs, a well studied
class of planar graphs which can be drawn in a plane such that all edges are
drawn upwards. We show that on the class of upward planar digraphs the problem
(i) remains NP-complete and (ii) the problem is fixed-parameter tractable.
While membership in FPT follows immediately from \cite{CMPP}'s general result,
our algorithm has only single exponential parameter dependency compared to the
double exponential parameter dependence for general planar digraphs.
Furthermore, our algorithm can easily be implemented, in contrast to the
algorithm in \cite{CMPP}.Comment: 14 page
Finding k partially disjoint paths in a directed planar graph
The {\it partially disjoint paths problem} is: {\it given:} a directed graph,
vertices , and a set of pairs from
, {\it find:} for each a directed path
such that if then and are disjoint.
We show that for fixed , this problem is solvable in polynomial time if
the directed graph is planar. More generally, the problem is solvable in
polynomial time for directed graphs embedded on a fixed compact surface.
Moreover, one may specify for each edge a subset of
prescribing which of the paths are allowed to traverse this edge
Are there any good digraph width measures?
Several different measures for digraph width have appeared in the last few
years. However, none of them shares all the "nice" properties of treewidth:
First, being \emph{algorithmically useful} i.e. admitting polynomial-time
algorithms for all \MS1-definable problems on digraphs of bounded width. And,
second, having nice \emph{structural properties} i.e. being monotone under
taking subdigraphs and some form of arc contractions. As for the former,
(undirected) \MS1 seems to be the least common denominator of all reasonably
expressive logical languages on digraphs that can speak about the edge/arc
relation on the vertex set.The latter property is a necessary condition for a
width measure to be characterizable by some version of the cops-and-robber game
characterizing the ordinary treewidth. Our main result is that \emph{any
reasonable} algorithmically useful and structurally nice digraph measure cannot
be substantially different from the treewidth of the underlying undirected
graph. Moreover, we introduce \emph{directed topological minors} and argue that
they are the weakest useful notion of minors for digraphs
The Complexity of Routing with Few Collisions
We study the computational complexity of routing multiple objects through a
network in such a way that only few collisions occur: Given a graph with
two distinct terminal vertices and two positive integers and , the
question is whether one can connect the terminals by at least routes (e.g.
paths) such that at most edges are time-wise shared among them. We study
three types of routes: traverse each vertex at most once (paths), each edge at
most once (trails), or no such restrictions (walks). We prove that for paths
and trails the problem is NP-complete on undirected and directed graphs even if
is constant or the maximum vertex degree in the input graph is constant.
For walks, however, it is solvable in polynomial time on undirected graphs for
arbitrary and on directed graphs if is constant. We additionally study
for all route types a variant of the problem where the maximum length of a
route is restricted by some given upper bound. We prove that this
length-restricted variant has the same complexity classification with respect
to paths and trails, but for walks it becomes NP-complete on undirected graphs
A Trichotomy for Regular Simple Path Queries on Graphs
Regular path queries (RPQs) select nodes connected by some path in a graph.
The edge labels of such a path have to form a word that matches a given regular
expression. We investigate the evaluation of RPQs with an additional constraint
that prevents multiple traversals of the same nodes. Those regular simple path
queries (RSPQs) find several applications in practice, yet they quickly become
intractable, even for basic languages such as (aa)* or a*ba*.
In this paper, we establish a comprehensive classification of regular
languages with respect to the complexity of the corresponding regular simple
path query problem. More precisely, we identify the fragment that is maximal in
the following sense: regular simple path queries can be evaluated in polynomial
time for every regular language L that belongs to this fragment and evaluation
is NP-complete for languages outside this fragment. We thus fully characterize
the frontier between tractability and intractability for RSPQs, and we refine
our results to show the following trichotomy: Evaluations of RSPQs is either
AC0, NL-complete or NP-complete in data complexity, depending on the regular
language L. The fragment identified also admits a simple characterization in
terms of regular expressions.
Finally, we also discuss the complexity of the following decision problem:
decide, given a language L, whether finding a regular simple path for L is
tractable. We consider several alternative representations of L: DFAs, NFAs or
regular expressions, and prove that this problem is NL-complete for the first
representation and PSPACE-complete for the other two. As a conclusion we extend
our results from edge-labeled graphs to vertex-labeled graphs and vertex-edge
labeled graphs.Comment: 15 pages, conference submissio
- …