3,954 research outputs found

    The domination number and the least QQ-eigenvalue

    Full text link
    A vertex set DD of a graph GG is said to be a dominating set if every vertex of V(G)DV(G)\setminus D is adjacent to at least a vertex in DD, and the domination number γ(G)\gamma(G) (γ\gamma, for short) is the minimum cardinality of all dominating sets of GG. For a graph, the least QQ-eigenvalue is the least eigenvalue of its signless Laplacian matrix. In this paper, for a nonbipartite graph with both order nn and domination number γ\gamma, we show that n3γ1n\geq 3\gamma-1, and show that it contains a unicyclic spanning subgraph with the same domination number γ\gamma. By investigating the relation between the domination number and the least QQ-eigenvalue of a graph, we minimize the least QQ-eigenvalue among all the nonbipartite graphs with given domination number.Comment: 13 pages, 3 figure

    Laplacian Distribution and Domination

    Get PDF
    Let mG(I)m_G(I) denote the number of Laplacian eigenvalues of a graph GG in an interval II, and let γ(G)\gamma(G) denote its domination number. We extend the recent result mG[0,1)γ(G)m_G[0,1) \leq \gamma(G), and show that isolate-free graphs also satisfy γ(G)mG[2,n]\gamma(G) \leq m_G[2,n]. In pursuit of better understanding Laplacian eigenvalue distribution, we find applications for these inequalities. We relate these spectral parameters with the approximability of γ(G)\gamma(G), showing that γ(G)mG[0,1)∉O(logn)\frac{\gamma(G)}{m_G[0,1)} \not\in O(\log n). However, γ(G)mG[2,n](c+1)γ(G)\gamma(G) \leq m_G[2, n] \leq (c + 1) \gamma(G) for cc-cyclic graphs, c1c \geq 1. For trees TT, γ(T)mT[2,n]2γ(G)\gamma(T) \leq m_T[2, n] \leq 2 \gamma(G)

    Universality for general Wigner-type matrices

    Get PDF
    We consider the local eigenvalue distribution of large self-adjoint N×NN\times N random matrices H=H\mathbf{H}=\mathbf{H}^* with centered independent entries. In contrast to previous works the matrix of variances sij=Ehij2s_{ij} = \mathbb{E}\, |h_{ij}|^2 is not assumed to be stochastic. Hence the density of states is not the Wigner semicircle law. Its possible shapes are described in the companion paper [1]. We show that as NN grows, the resolvent, G(z)=(Hz)1\mathbf{G}(z)=(\mathbf{H}-z)^{-1}, converges to a diagonal matrix, diag(m(z)) \mathrm{diag}(\mathbf{m}(z)) , where m(z)=(m1(z),,mN(z))\mathbf{m}(z)=(m_1(z),\dots,m_N(z)) solves the vector equation 1/mi(z)=z+jsijmj(z) -1/m_i(z) = z + \sum_j s_{ij} m_j(z) that has been analyzed in [1]. We prove a local law down to the smallest spectral resolution scale, and bulk universality for both real symmetric and complex hermitian symmetry classes.Comment: Changes in version 3: The format of pictures was changed to resolve a conflict with certain pdf viewer
    corecore