83,478 research outputs found
Multilevel Weighted Support Vector Machine for Classification on Healthcare Data with Missing Values
This work is motivated by the needs of predictive analytics on healthcare
data as represented by Electronic Medical Records. Such data is invariably
problematic: noisy, with missing entries, with imbalance in classes of
interests, leading to serious bias in predictive modeling. Since standard data
mining methods often produce poor performance measures, we argue for
development of specialized techniques of data-preprocessing and classification.
In this paper, we propose a new method to simultaneously classify large
datasets and reduce the effects of missing values. It is based on a multilevel
framework of the cost-sensitive SVM and the expected maximization imputation
method for missing values, which relies on iterated regression analyses. We
compare classification results of multilevel SVM-based algorithms on public
benchmark datasets with imbalanced classes and missing values as well as real
data in health applications, and show that our multilevel SVM-based method
produces fast, and more accurate and robust classification results.Comment: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1503.0625
Model Selection for Support Vector Machine Classification
We address the problem of model selection for Support Vector Machine (SVM)
classification. For fixed functional form of the kernel, model selection
amounts to tuning kernel parameters and the slack penalty coefficient . We
begin by reviewing a recently developed probabilistic framework for SVM
classification. An extension to the case of SVMs with quadratic slack penalties
is given and a simple approximation for the evidence is derived, which can be
used as a criterion for model selection. We also derive the exact gradients of
the evidence in terms of posterior averages and describe how they can be
estimated numerically using Hybrid Monte Carlo techniques. Though
computationally demanding, the resulting gradient ascent algorithm is a useful
baseline tool for probabilistic SVM model selection, since it can locate maxima
of the exact (unapproximated) evidence. We then perform extensive experiments
on several benchmark data sets. The aim of these experiments is to compare the
performance of probabilistic model selection criteria with alternatives based
on estimates of the test error, namely the so-called ``span estimate'' and
Wahba's Generalized Approximate Cross-Validation (GACV) error. We find that all
the ``simple'' model criteria (Laplace evidence approximations, and the Span
and GACV error estimates) exhibit multiple local optima with respect to the
hyperparameters. While some of these give performance that is competitive with
results from other approaches in the literature, a significant fraction lead to
rather higher test errors. The results for the evidence gradient ascent method
show that also the exact evidence exhibits local optima, but these give test
errors which are much less variable and also consistently lower than for the
simpler model selection criteria
European exchange trading funds trading with locally weighted support vector regression
In this paper, two different Locally Weighted Support Vector Regression (wSVR) algorithms are generated and applied to the task of forecasting and trading five European Exchange Traded Funds. The trading application covers the recent European Monetary Union debt crisis. The performance of the proposed models is benchmarked against traditional Support Vector Regression (SVR) models. The Radial Basis Function, the Wavelet and the Mahalanobis kernel are explored and tested as SVR kernels. Finally, a novel statistical SVR input selection procedure is introduced based on a principal component analysis and the Hansen, Lunde, and Nason (2011) model confidence test. The results demonstrate the superiority of the wSVR models over the traditional SVRs and of the v-SVR over the ε-SVR algorithms. We note that the performance of all models varies and considerably deteriorates in the peak of the debt crisis. In terms of the kernels, our results do not confirm the belief that the Radial Basis Function is the optimum choice for financial series
Learning to Rank Academic Experts in the DBLP Dataset
Expert finding is an information retrieval task that is concerned with the
search for the most knowledgeable people with respect to a specific topic, and
the search is based on documents that describe people's activities. The task
involves taking a user query as input and returning a list of people who are
sorted by their level of expertise with respect to the user query. Despite
recent interest in the area, the current state-of-the-art techniques lack in
principled approaches for optimally combining different sources of evidence.
This article proposes two frameworks for combining multiple estimators of
expertise. These estimators are derived from textual contents, from
graph-structure of the citation patterns for the community of experts, and from
profile information about the experts. More specifically, this article explores
the use of supervised learning to rank methods, as well as rank aggregation
approaches, for combing all of the estimators of expertise. Several supervised
learning algorithms, which are representative of the pointwise, pairwise and
listwise approaches, were tested, and various state-of-the-art data fusion
techniques were also explored for the rank aggregation framework. Experiments
that were performed on a dataset of academic publications from the Computer
Science domain attest the adequacy of the proposed approaches.Comment: Expert Systems, 2013. arXiv admin note: text overlap with
arXiv:1302.041
- …