Distributional Semantic Models for Clinical Text Applied to Health Record Summarization

As information systems in the health sector are becoming increasingly computerized, large amounts of care-related information are being stored electronically. In hospitals clinicians continuously document treatment and care given to patients in electronic health record (EHR) systems. Much of the information being documented is in the form of clinical notes, or narratives, containing primarily unstructured free-text information. For each care episode, clinical notes are written on a regular basis, ending with a discharge summary that basically summarizes the care episode. Although EHR systems are helpful for storing and managing such information, there is an unrealized potential in utilizing this information for smarter care assistance, as well as for secondary purposes such as research and education. Advances in clinical language processing are enabling computers to assist clinicians in their interaction with the free-text information documented in EHR systems. This includes assisting in tasks like query-based search, terminology development, knowledge extraction, translation, and summarization. This thesis explores various computerized approaches and methods aimed at enabling automated semantic textual similarity assessment and information extraction based on the free-text information in EHR systems. The focus is placed on the task of (semi-)automated summarization of the clinical notes written during individual care episodes. The overall theme of the presented work is to utilize resource-light approaches and methods, circumventing the need to manually develop knowledge resources or training data. Thus, to enable computational semantic textual similarity assessment, word distribution statistics are derived from large training corpora of clinical free text and stored as vector-based representations referred to as distributional semantic models. Also resource-light methods are explored in the task of performing automatic summarization of clinical freetext information, relying on semantic textual similarity assessment. Novel and experimental methods are presented and evaluated that focus on: a) distributional semantic models trained in an unsupervised manner from statistical information derived from large unannotated clinical free-text corpora; b) representing and computing semantic similarities between linguistic items of different granularity, primarily words, sentences and clinical notes; and c) summarizing clinical free-text information from individual care episodes. Results are evaluated against gold standards that reflect human judgements. The results indicate that the use of distributional semantics is promising as a resource-light approach to automated capturing of semantic textual similarity relations from unannotated clinical text corpora. Here it is important that the semantics correlate with the clinical terminology, and with various semantic similarity assessment tasks. Improvements over classical approaches are achieved when the underlying vector-based representations allow for a broader range of semantic features to be captured and represented. These are either distributed over multiple semantic models trained with different features and training corpora, or use models that store multiple sense-vectors per word. Further, the use of structured meta-level information accompanying care episodes is explored as training features for distributional semantic models, with the aim of capturing semantic relations suitable for care episode-level information retrieval. Results indicate that such models performs well in clinical information retrieval. It is shown that a method called Random Indexing can be modified to construct distributional semantic models that capture multiple sense-vectors for each word in the training corpus. This is done in a way that retains the original training properties of the Random Indexing method, by being incremental, scalable and distributional. Distributional semantic models trained with a framework called Word2vec, which relies on the use of neural networks, outperform those trained using the classic Random Indexing method in several semantic similarity assessment tasks, when training is done using comparable parameters and the same training corpora. Finally, several statistical features in clinical text are explored in terms of their ability to indicate sentence significance in a text summary generated from the clinical notes. This includes the use of distributional semantics to enable case-based similarity assessment, where cases are other care episodes and their “solutions”, i.e., discharge summaries. A type of manual evaluation is performed, where human experts rates the different aspects of the summaries using a evaluation scheme/tool. In addition, the original clinician-written discharge summaries are explored as gold standard for the purpose of automated evaluation. Evaluation shows a high correlation between manual and automated evaluation, suggesting that such a gold standard can function as a proxy for human evaluations. --- This thesis has been published jointly with Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway and University of Turku, Finland.This thesis has beenpublished jointly with Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway.Siirretty Doriast

Soft-prompt tuning to predict lung cancer using primary care free-text Dutch medical notes

We investigate different natural language processing (NLP) approaches based on contextualised word representations for the problem of early prediction of lung cancer using free-text patient medical notes of Dutch primary care physicians. Because lung cancer has a low prevalence in primary care, we also address the problem of classification under highly imbalanced classes. Specifically, we use large Transformer-based pretrained language models (PLMs) and investigate: 1) how \textit{soft prompt-tuning} -- an NLP technique used to adapt PLMs using small amounts of training data -- compares to standard model fine-tuning; 2) whether simpler static word embedding models (WEMs) can be more robust compared to PLMs in highly imbalanced settings; and 3) how models fare when trained on notes from a small number of patients. We find that 1) soft-prompt tuning is an efficient alternative to standard model fine-tuning; 2) PLMs show better discrimination but worse calibration compared to simpler static word embedding models as the classification problem becomes more imbalanced; and 3) results when training models on small number of patients are mixed and show no clear differences between PLMs and WEMs. All our code is available open source in \url{https://bitbucket.org/aumc-kik/prompt_tuning_cancer_prediction/}.Comment: A short version of this paper has been published at the 21st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIME 2023

Madness decolonized?: Madness as transnational identity in Gail Hornstein’s Agnes’s Jacket

The US psychologist Gail Hornstein’s monograph Agnes’s Jacket: A Psychologist’s Search for the Meanings of Madness (2009) is an important intervention in the identity politics of the mad movement. Hornstein offers a resignified vision of mad identity that embroiders the central trope of an “anti-colonial” struggle to reclaim the experiential world “colonized” by psychiatry. A series of literal and figurative appeals make recourse to the inner world and (corresponding) cultural world of the mad, as well as to the ethno-symbolic cultural materials of dormant nationhood. This rhetoric is augmented by a model in which the mad comprise a diaspora without an origin, coalescing into a single transnational community. The mad are also depicted as persons displaced from their metaphorical homeland, the “inner” world “colonized” by the psychiatric regime. There are a number of difficulties with Hornstein’s rhetoric, however. Her “ethnicity-and-rights” response to the oppression of the mad is symptomatic of Western parochialism, while her proposed transmutation of putative psychopathology from limit upon identity to parameter of successful identity is open to contestation. Moreover, unless one accepts Hornstein’s porous vision of mad identity, her self-ascribed insider status in relation to the mad community may present a problematic “re-colonization” of mad experience