The difference between the domination number and the minus domination number of a cubic graph

AbstractThe closed neighborhood of a vertex subset S of a graph G = (V, E), denoted as N[S], is defined as the union of S and the set of all the vertices adjacent to some vertex of S. A dominating set of a graph G = (V, E) is defined as a set S of vertices such that N[S] = V. The domination number of a graph G, denoted as γ(G), is the minimum possible size of a dominating set of G. A minus dominating function on a graph G = (V, E) is a function g : V → {−1, 0, 1} such that g(N[v]) ≥ 1 for all vertices. The weight of a minus dominating function g is defined as g(V) =ΣvϵVg(v). The minus domination number of a graph G, denoted as γ−(G), is the minimum possible weight of a minus dominating function on G. It is well known that γ−(G) ≤ γ(G). This paper is focused on the difference between γ(G) and γ−(G) for cubic graphs. We first present a graph-theoretic description of γ−(G). Based on this, we give a necessary and sufficient condition for γ(G) −γ−(G) ≥ k. Further, we present an infinite family of cubic graphs of order 18k + 16 and with γ(G) −γ−(G) ≥

A note on domination and minus domination numbers in cubic graphs

Author name used in this publication: C. T. Ng2005-2006 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journalAccepted ManuscriptPublishe

Locating-dominating sets and identifying codes in graphs of girth at least 5

Locating-dominating sets and identifying codes are two closely related notions in the area of separating systems. Roughly speaking, they consist in a dominating set of a graph such that every vertex is uniquely identified by its neighbourhood within the dominating set. In this paper, we study the size of a smallest locating-dominating set or identifying code for graphs of girth at least 5 and of given minimum degree. We use the technique of vertex-disjoint paths to provide upper bounds on the minimum size of such sets, and construct graphs who come close to meet these bounds.Comment: 20 pages, 9 figure

Location-domination in line graphs

A set $D$ of vertices of a graph $G$ is locating if every two distinct vertices outside $D$ have distinct neighbors in $D$; that is, for distinct vertices $u$ and $v$ outside $D$, $N(u) \cap D \neq N(v) \cap D$, where $N(u)$ denotes the open neighborhood of $u$. If $D$ is also a dominating set (total dominating set), it is called a locating-dominating set (respectively, locating-total dominating set) of $G$. A graph $G$ is twin-free if every two distinct vertices of $G$ have distinct open and closed neighborhoods. It is conjectured [D. Garijo, A. Gonzalez and A. Marquez, The difference between the metric dimension and the determining number of a graph. Applied Mathematics and Computation 249 (2014), 487--501] and [F. Foucaud and M. A. Henning. Locating-total dominating sets in twin-free graphs: a conjecture. The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics 23 (2016), P3.9] respectively, that any twin-free graph $G$ without isolated vertices has a locating-dominating set of size at most one-half its order and a locating-total dominating set of size at most two-thirds its order. In this paper, we prove these two conjectures for the class of line graphs. Both bounds are tight for this class, in the sense that there are infinitely many connected line graphs for which equality holds in the bounds.Comment: 23 pages, 2 figure

The domination parameters of cubic graphs

Let ir(G), γ(G), i(G), β0(G), Γ(G) and IR(G) be the irredundance number, the domination number, the independent domination number, the independence number, the upper domination number and the upper irredundance number of a graph G, respectively. In this paper we show that for any nonnegative integers k 1, k 2, k 3, k 4, k 5 there exists a cubic graph G satisfying the following conditions: γ(G) - ir(G) ≤ k 1, i(G) - γ(G) ≤ k 2, β0(G) - i(G) > k 3, Γ(G) - β0(G) - k 4, and IR(G) - Γ(G) - k 5. This result settles a problem posed in [9]. © Springer-Verlag 2005

The random geometry of equilibrium phases

This is a (long) survey about applications of percolation theory in equilibrium statistical mechanics. The chapters are as follows: 1. Introduction 2. Equilibrium phases 3. Some models 4. Coupling and stochastic domination 5. Percolation 6. Random-cluster representations 7. Uniqueness and exponential mixing from non-percolation 8. Phase transition and percolation 9. Random interactions 10. Continuum modelsComment: 118 pages. Addresses: [email protected] http://www.mathematik.uni-muenchen.de/~georgii.html [email protected] http://www.math.chalmers.se/~olleh [email protected]

A Linear Kernel for Planar Total Dominating Set

A total dominating set of a graph $G=(V,E)$ is a subset $D \subseteq V$ such that every vertex in $V$ is adjacent to some vertex in $D$. Finding a total dominating set of minimum size is NP-hard on planar graphs and W[2]-complete on general graphs when parameterized by the solution size. By the meta-theorem of Bodlaender et al. [J. ACM, 2016], there exists a linear kernel for Total Dominating Set on graphs of bounded genus. Nevertheless, it is not clear how such a kernel can be effectively constructed, and how to obtain explicit reduction rules with reasonably small constants. Following the approach of Alber et al. [J. ACM, 2004], we provide an explicit kernel for Total Dominating Set on planar graphs with at most $410k$ vertices, where $k$ is the size of the solution. This result complements several known constructive linear kernels on planar graphs for other domination problems such as Dominating Set, Edge Dominating Set, Efficient Dominating Set, Connected Dominating Set, or Red-Blue Dominating Set.Comment: 33 pages, 13 figure

Maker-Breaker total domination games on cubic graphs

We study Maker-Breaker total domination game played by two players, Dominator and Staller on the connected cubic graphs. Staller (playing the role of Maker) wins if she manages to claim an open neighbourhood of a vertex. Dominator wins otherwise (i.e. if he can claim a total dominating set of a graph). For certain graphs on $n\geq 6$ vertices, we give the characterization on those which are Dominator's win and those which are Staller's win

Progress towards the two-thirds conjecture on locating-total dominating sets

We study upper bounds on the size of optimum locating-total dominating sets in graphs. A set $S$ of vertices of a graph $G$ is a locating-total dominating set if every vertex of $G$ has a neighbor in $S$, and if any two vertices outside $S$ have distinct neighborhoods within $S$. The smallest size of such a set is denoted by $\gamma^L_t(G)$. It has been conjectured that $\gamma^L_t(G)\leq\frac{2n}{3}$ holds for every twin-free graph $G$ of order $n$ without isolated vertices. We prove that the conjecture holds for cobipartite graphs, split graphs, block graphs, subcubic graphs and outerplanar graphs