3,552 research outputs found
Multiparty Dynamics and Failure Modes for Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence
An important challenge for safety in machine learning and artificial
intelligence systems is a~set of related failures involving specification
gaming, reward hacking, fragility to distributional shifts, and Goodhart's or
Campbell's law. This paper presents additional failure modes for interactions
within multi-agent systems that are closely related. These multi-agent failure
modes are more complex, more problematic, and less well understood than the
single-agent case, and are also already occurring, largely unnoticed. After
motivating the discussion with examples from poker-playing artificial
intelligence (AI), the paper explains why these failure modes are in some
senses unavoidable. Following this, the paper categorizes failure modes,
provides definitions, and cites examples for each of the modes: accidental
steering, coordination failures, adversarial misalignment, input spoofing and
filtering, and goal co-option or direct hacking. The paper then discusses how
extant literature on multi-agent AI fails to address these failure modes, and
identifies work which may be useful for the mitigation of these failure modes.Comment: 12 Pages, This version re-submitted to Big Data and Cognitive
Computing, Special Issue "Artificial Superintelligence: Coordination &
Strategy
Economic interests and the origins of electoral systems
Die gängige Begründung – basierend auf der bahnbrechenden Arbeit Rokkans – dafür, dass ein spezifisches Wahlsystem bevorzugt wird, ist, dass die Verhältniswahl („proportional respresentation“ oder „PR“) von einer zersplitterten Rechte eingeführt wurde, um ihre Klasseninteressen gegenüber denen einer wachsenden Linken zu verteidigen. Neue Erkenntnisse zeigen jedoch, dass PR tatsächlich die Linke und das Konzept der Umverteilung stärkt. Wir behaupten daher, dass die allgemein akzeptierte Sichtweise historisch, analytisch und empirisch falsch ist. Unsere Erklärung für die Einführung der PR ist eine grundlegend andere: Durch die Integration zweier gegensätzlicher Interpretationen von PR – das Konzept der minimal erfolgreichen Koalitionen [minimum winning coalition] gegenüber dem Konzept des Konsens – gehen wir davon aus, dass die Rechte PR übernommen hat, als ihre Unterstützung für konsensuelle rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen (besonders im Arbeitsmarkt und in der Ausbildung neuer Arbeitskräfte, wo spezifische Investitionen wichtig waren) wichtiger wurde als ihre Abneigung gegen die Umverteilungsauswirkungen; dies passierte in den Ländern, die vorher eine eng organisierte kommunale Wirtschaft hatten. In Ländern mit relativ schlechten Arbeitgeber- Arbeitnehmer-Beziehungen und einer schwach ausgeprägten Koordination zwischen Wirtschaft und Gewerkschaften hatte die Beibehaltung von Mehrheitssystemen die Funktion, die Linke in Schach zu halten. Diese Tatsache erklärt die enge Beziehung zwischen den bestehenden Varianten von Kapitalismus und Wahlsystemen und warum diese weiterhin fortbestehen. -- The standard explanation for the choice of electoral institutions, building on Rokkan’s seminal work, is that proportional representation (PR) was adopted by a divided right to defend its class interests against a rising left. But new evidence shows that PR strengthens the left and redistribution, and we argue the standard view is wrong historically, analytically, and empirically. We offer a radically different explanation. Integrating two opposed interpretations of PR – minimum winning coalitions versus consensus – we propose that the right adopted PR when their support for consensual regulatory frameworks, especially of labor markets and skill formation where co-specific investments were important, outweighed their opposition to the redistributive consequences; this occurred in countries with previously densely organized local economies. In countries with adversarial industrial relations, and weak coordination of business and unions, keeping majoritarian institutions helped contain the left. This explains the close association between current varieties of capitalism and electoral institutions, and why they persist over time.Economic Models of Political Processes,Government,War,Law,and Regulation (Comparative),Political Economy of Capitalism
Mechanisms for Automated Negotiation in State Oriented Domains
This paper lays part of the groundwork for a domain theory of negotiation,
that is, a way of classifying interactions so that it is clear, given a domain,
which negotiation mechanisms and strategies are appropriate. We define State
Oriented Domains, a general category of interaction. Necessary and sufficient
conditions for cooperation are outlined. We use the notion of worth in an
altered definition of utility, thus enabling agreements in a wider class of
joint-goal reachable situations. An approach is offered for conflict
resolution, and it is shown that even in a conflict situation, partial
cooperative steps can be taken by interacting agents (that is, agents in
fundamental conflict might still agree to cooperate up to a certain point). A
Unified Negotiation Protocol (UNP) is developed that can be used in all types
of encounters. It is shown that in certain borderline cooperative situations, a
partial cooperative agreement (i.e., one that does not achieve all agents'
goals) might be preferred by all agents, even though there exists a rational
agreement that would achieve all their goals. Finally, we analyze cases where
agents have incomplete information on the goals and worth of other agents.
First we consider the case where agents' goals are private information, and we
analyze what goal declaration strategies the agents might adopt to increase
their utility. Then, we consider the situation where the agents' goals (and
therefore stand-alone costs) are common knowledge, but the worth they attach to
their goals is private information. We introduce two mechanisms, one 'strict',
the other 'tolerant', and analyze their affects on the stability and efficiency
of negotiation outcomes.Comment: See http://www.jair.org/ for any accompanying file
Applications of Blockchain for the Governance of Integrated Project Delivery: A Crypto Commons Approach
This paper outlines why and how blockchain can digitally support and evolve
the governance of collaborative project deliveries, such as integrated project
deliveries (IPDs), to provide the foundation for novel and disruptive forms of
organizational collaboration in the construction industry. Previous work has
conceptualized IPDs as a common pool resource (CPR) scenario, where shared
resources are collectively governed. Through the use of blockchain and smart
contracts for trustworthy peer-to-peer transactions and execution logic,
Ostrom's design principles can be digitally encoded to scale CPR scenarios.
Building on the identified connections, the paper 1) synthesizes fourteen
blockchain-based mechanisms to govern CPRs, 2) identifies twenty-two
applications of these mechanisms to govern IPDs, and 3) introduces a
conceptualization of the above relationships towards a holistic understanding
of collaborative project deliveries on the crypto commons for novel collective
organization of construction project delivery between both humans and machines
Tasks for Agent-Based Negotiation Teams:Analysis, Review, and Challenges
An agent-based negotiation team is a group of interdependent agents that join
together as a single negotiation party due to their shared interests in the
negotiation at hand. The reasons to employ an agent-based negotiation team may
vary: (i) more computation and parallelization capabilities, (ii) unite agents
with different expertise and skills whose joint work makes it possible to
tackle complex negotiation domains, (iii) the necessity to represent different
stakeholders or different preferences in the same party (e.g., organizations,
countries, and married couple). The topic of agent-based negotiation teams has
been recently introduced in multi-agent research. Therefore, it is necessary to
identify good practices, challenges, and related research that may help in
advancing the state-of-the-art in agent-based negotiation teams. For that
reason, in this article we review the tasks to be carried out by agent-based
negotiation teams. Each task is analyzed and related with current advances in
different research areas. The analysis aims to identify special challenges that
may arise due to the particularities of agent-based negotiation teams.Comment: Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 201
Does Government Ideology Matter in Monetary Policy? – A Panel Data Analysis for OECD Countries
This paper examines the effect of government ideology on monetary policy in a quarterly data set of 15 OECD countries in the period 1980.1–2005.4. Our Taylor-rule specification focuses on the interactions of a new time-variant indicator for central bank independence and government ideology. The results suggest that leftist governments did not decrease short term nominal interest rates at all. In contrast, short term nominal interest rates were higher under leftist governments. A potential reason for this finding might be that leftist governments have sought to make a market-oriented policy shift by delegating monetary policy to conservative central bankers.Monetary policy, Taylor rule, government ideology, partisan politics, central bank independence, panel data
- …