An Algorithm for the Constrained Longest Common Subsequence and Substring Problem

Let $\Sigma$ be an alphabet. For two strings $X$, $Y$, and a constrained string $P$ over the alphabet $\Sigma$, the constrained longest common subsequence and substring problem for two strings $X$ and $Y$ with respect to $P$ is to find a longest string $Z$ which is a subsequence of $X$, a substring of $Y$, and has $P$ as a subsequence. In this paper, we propose an algorithm for the constrained longest common subsequence and substring problem for two strings with a constrained string.Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2308.0092

Variants of Constrained Longest Common Subsequence

In this work, we consider a variant of the classical Longest Common Subsequence problem called Doubly-Constrained Longest Common Subsequence (DC-LCS). Given two strings s1 and s2 over an alphabet A, a set C_s of strings, and a function Co from A to N, the DC-LCS problem consists in finding the longest subsequence s of s1 and s2 such that s is a supersequence of all the strings in Cs and such that the number of occurrences in s of each symbol a in A is upper bounded by Co(a). The DC-LCS problem provides a clear mathematical formulation of a sequence comparison problem in Computational Biology and generalizes two other constrained variants of the LCS problem: the Constrained LCS and the Repetition-Free LCS. We present two results for the DC-LCS problem. First, we illustrate a fixed-parameter algorithm where the parameter is the length of the solution. Secondly, we prove a parameterized hardness result for the Constrained LCS problem when the parameter is the number of the constraint strings and the size of the alphabet A. This hardness result also implies the parameterized hardness of the DC-LCS problem (with the same parameters) and its NP-hardness when the size of the alphabet is constant

Longest Common Subsequence with Gap Constraints

We consider the longest common subsequence problem in the context of subsequences with gap constraints. In particular, following Day et al. 2022, we consider the setting when the distance (i. e., the gap) between two consecutive symbols of the subsequence has to be between a lower and an upper bound (which may depend on the position of those symbols in the subsequence or on the symbols bordering the gap) as well as the case where the entire subsequence is found in a bounded range (defined by a single upper bound), considered by Kosche et al. 2022. In all these cases, we present effcient algorithms for determining the length of the longest common constrained subsequence between two given strings

Constrained Longest Common Subsequence Computing Algorithms in Practice

The problem of finding a constrained longest common subsequence (CLCS) for the sequences A and B with respect to sequence P was introduced recently. Its goal is to find a longest subsequence C of A and B such that P is a subsequence of C. There are several algorithms solving the CLCS problem, but there is no real experimental comparison of them. The paper has two aims. Firstly, we propose an improvement to the algorithms by Chin et al. and Deorowicz based on an entry-exit points technique by He and Arslan. Secondly, we compare experimentally the existing algorithms for solving the CLCS problem

The substring inclusion constraint longest common subsequence problem can be solved in quadratic time

AbstractIn this paper, we study some variants of the Constrained Longest Common Subsequence (CLCS) problem, namely, the substring inclusion CLCS (Substring-IC-CLCS) problem and a generalized version thereof. In the Substring-IC-CLCS problem, we are to find a longest common subsequence (LCS) of two given strings containing a third constraint string (given) as a substring. Previous solution to this problem runs in cubic time, i.e, O(nmk) time, where n,m and k are the length of the 3 input strings. In this paper, we present simple O(nm) time algorithms to solve the Substring-IC-CLCS problem. We also study the Generalized Substring-IC-LCS problem where we are given two strings of length n and m respectively and an ordered list of p strings and the goal is to find an LCS containing each of them as a substring in the order they appear in the list. We present an O(nmp) algorithm for this generalized version of the problem

Faster STR-IC-LCS Computation via RLE

The constrained LCS problem asks one to find a longest common subsequence of two input strings A and B with some constraints. The STR-IC-LCS problem is a variant of the constrained LCS problem, where the solution must include a given constraint string C as a substring. Given two strings A and B of respective lengths M and N, and a constraint string C of length at most min{M, N}, the best known algorithm for the STR-IC-LCS problem, proposed by Deorowicz (Inf. Process. Lett., 11:423-426, 2012), runs in O(MN) time. In this work, we present an O(mN + nM)-time solution to the STR-IC-LCS problem, where m and n denote the sizes of the run-length encodings of A and B, respectively. Since m <= M and n <= N always hold, our algorithm is always as fast as Deorowicz\u27s algorithm, and is faster when input strings are compressible via RLE

An Efficient Dynamic Programming Algorithm for the Generalized LCS Problem with Multiple Substring Exclusion Constrains

In this paper, we consider a generalized longest common subsequence problem with multiple substring exclusion constrains. For the two input sequences $X$ and $Y$ of lengths $n$ and $m$, and a set of $d$ constrains $P=\{P_1,...,P_d\}$ of total length $r$, the problem is to find a common subsequence $Z$ of $X$ and $Y$ excluding each of constrain string in $P$ as a substring and the length of $Z$ is maximized. The problem was declared to be NP-hard\cite{1}, but we finally found that this is not true. A new dynamic programming solution for this problem is presented in this paper. The correctness of the new algorithm is proved. The time complexity of our algorithm is $O(nmr)$.Comment: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1301.718