1,959 research outputs found

    The complexity of recognizing minimally tough graphs

    Get PDF
    A graph is called tt-tough if the removal of any vertex set SS that disconnects the graph leaves at most S/t|S|/t components. The toughness of a graph is the largest tt for which the graph is tt-tough. A graph is minimally tt-tough if the toughness of the graph is tt and the deletion of any edge from the graph decreases the toughness. The complexity class DP is the set of all languages that can be expressed as the intersection of a language in NP and a language in coNP. In this paper, we prove that recognizing minimally tt-tough graphs is DP-complete for any positive rational number tt. We introduce a new notion called weighted toughness, which has a key role in our proof

    Properties of minimally tt-tough graphs

    Get PDF
    A graph GG is minimally tt-tough if the toughness of GG is tt and the deletion of any edge from GG decreases the toughness. Kriesell conjectured that for every minimally 11-tough graph the minimum degree δ(G)=2\delta(G)=2. We show that in every minimally 11-tough graph δ(G)n+23\delta(G)\le\frac{n+2}{3}. We also prove that every minimally 11-tough claw-free graph is a cycle. On the other hand, we show that for every tQt \in \mathbb{Q} any graph can be embedded as an induced subgraph into a minimally tt-tough graph

    Minimally toughness in special graph classes

    Full text link
    Let tt be a positive real number. A graph is called tt-tough, if the removal of any cutset SS leaves at most S/t|S|/t components. The toughness of a graph is the largest tt for which the graph is tt-tough. A graph is minimally tt-tough, if the toughness of the graph is tt and the deletion of any edge from the graph decreases the toughness. In this paper we investigate the minimum degree and the recognizability of minimally tt-tough graphs in the class of chordal graphs, split graphs, claw-free graphs and 2K22K_2-free graphs

    Conditions for minimally tough graphs

    Full text link
    Katona, Solt\'esz, and Varga showed that no induced subgraph can be excluded from the class of minimally tough graphs. In this paper, we consider the opposite question, namely which induced subgraphs, if any, must necessarily be present in each minimally tt-tough graph. Katona and Varga showed that for any rational number t(1/2,1]t \in (1/2,1], every minimally tt-tough graph contains a hole. We complement this result by showing that for any rational number t>1t>1, every minimally tt-tough graph must contain either a hole or an induced subgraph isomorphic to the kk-sun for some integer k3k \ge 3. We also show that for any rational number t>1/2t > 1/2, every minimally tt-tough graph must contain either an induced 44-cycle, an induced 55-cycle, or two independent edges as an induced subgraph

    Conditions for minimally tough graphs

    Get PDF
    Katona, Soltész, and Varga showed that no induced subgraph can be excluded from the class of minimally tough graphs. In this paper, we consider the opposite question, namely which induced subgraphs, if any, must necessarily be present in each minimally t-tough graph. Katona and Varga showed that for any rational number t∈(1/2,1], every minimally t-tough graph contains a hole. We complement this result by showing that for any rational number t>1, every minimally t-tough graph must contain either a hole or an induced subgraph isomorphic to the k-sun for some integer k≥3. We also show that for any rational number t>1/2, every minimally t-tough graph must contain either an induced 4-cycle, an induced 5-cycle, or two independent edges as an induced subgraph

    Proceedings of the 10th Japanese-Hungarian Symposium on Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications

    Get PDF

    Higher Education Exchange: 2009

    Get PDF
    This annual publication serves as a forum for new ideas and dialogue between scholars and the larger public. Essays explore ways that students, administrators, and faculty can initiate and sustain an ongoing conversation about the public life they share.The Higher Education Exchange is founded on a thought articulated by Thomas Jefferson in 1820: "I know no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves; and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."In the tradition of Jefferson, the Higher Education Exchange agrees that a central goal of higher education is to help make democracy possible by preparing citizens for public life. The Higher Education Exchange is part of a movement to strengthen higher education's democratic mission and foster a more democratic culture throughout American society.Working in this tradition, the Higher Education Exchange publishes interviews, case studies, analyses, news, and ideas about efforts within higher education to develop more democratic societies
    corecore