6,808 research outputs found

    Distance-generalized Core Decomposition

    Full text link
    The kk-core of a graph is defined as the maximal subgraph in which every vertex is connected to at least kk other vertices within that subgraph. In this work we introduce a distance-based generalization of the notion of kk-core, which we refer to as the (k,h)(k,h)-core, i.e., the maximal subgraph in which every vertex has at least kk other vertices at distance ≤h\leq h within that subgraph. We study the properties of the (k,h)(k,h)-core showing that it preserves many of the nice features of the classic core decomposition (e.g., its connection with the notion of distance-generalized chromatic number) and it preserves its usefulness to speed-up or approximate distance-generalized notions of dense structures, such as hh-club. Computing the distance-generalized core decomposition over large networks is intrinsically complex. However, by exploiting clever upper and lower bounds we can partition the computation in a set of totally independent subcomputations, opening the door to top-down exploration and to multithreading, and thus achieving an efficient algorithm

    Ramsey-nice families of graphs

    Get PDF
    For a finite family F\mathcal{F} of fixed graphs let Rk(F)R_k(\mathcal{F}) be the smallest integer nn for which every kk-coloring of the edges of the complete graph KnK_n yields a monochromatic copy of some F∈FF\in\mathcal{F}. We say that F\mathcal{F} is kk-nice if for every graph GG with χ(G)=Rk(F)\chi(G)=R_k(\mathcal{F}) and for every kk-coloring of E(G)E(G) there exists a monochromatic copy of some F∈FF\in\mathcal{F}. It is easy to see that if F\mathcal{F} contains no forest, then it is not kk-nice for any kk. It seems plausible to conjecture that a (weak) converse holds, namely, for any finite family of graphs F\mathcal{F} that contains at least one forest, and for all k≥k0(F)k\geq k_0(\mathcal{F}) (or at least for infinitely many values of kk), F\mathcal{F} is kk-nice. We prove several (modest) results in support of this conjecture, showing, in particular, that it holds for each of the three families consisting of two connected graphs with 3 edges each and observing that it holds for any family F\mathcal{F} containing a forest with at most 2 edges. We also study some related problems and disprove a conjecture by Aharoni, Charbit and Howard regarding the size of matchings in regular 3-partite 3-uniform hypergraphs.Comment: 20 pages, 2 figure
    • …
    corecore