On the Complexity of ATL and ATL* Module Checking

Module checking has been introduced in late 1990s to verify open systems, i.e., systems whose behavior depends on the continuous interaction with the environment. Classically, module checking has been investigated with respect to specifications given as CTL and CTL* formulas. Recently, it has been shown that CTL (resp., CTL*) module checking offers a distinctly different perspective from the better-known problem of ATL (resp., ATL*) model checking. In particular, ATL (resp., ATL*) module checking strictly enhances the expressiveness of both CTL (resp., CTL*) module checking and ATL (resp. ATL*) model checking. In this paper, we provide asymptotically optimal bounds on the computational cost of module checking against ATL and ATL*, whose upper bounds are based on an automata-theoretic approach. We show that module-checking for ATL is EXPTIME-complete, which is the same complexity of module checking against CTL. On the other hand, ATL* module checking turns out to be 3EXPTIME-complete, hence exponentially harder than CTL* module checking.Comment: In Proceedings GandALF 2017, arXiv:1709.0176

Understanding Racial Inequity in School Discipline Across the Richmond Region

This report comes from the MERC Achieving Racial Equity in School Disciplinary Policies and Practices study. Launched in the spring of 2015, the purpose of this mixed- method study was to understand the factors related to disproportionate school discipline outcomes in MERC division schools. The study had two phases. Phase one (quantitative) used primary and secondary data to explore racial disparities in school discipline in the MERC region as well as discipline programs schools use to address them. Phase two (qualitative) explored the implementation of discipline programs in three MERC region schools, as well as educator and student perceptions of school discipline and racial disproportionality. This report shares findings from both phases of our study and offers numerous implications and recommendations for research, policy, and practice

Approximating the Permanent with Fractional Belief Propagation

We discuss schemes for exact and approximate computations of permanents, and compare them with each other. Specifically, we analyze the Belief Propagation (BP) approach and its Fractional Belief Propagation (FBP) generalization for computing the permanent of a non-negative matrix. Known bounds and conjectures are verified in experiments, and some new theoretical relations, bounds and conjectures are proposed. The Fractional Free Energy (FFE) functional is parameterized by a scalar parameter $\gamma\in[-1;1]$, where $\gamma=-1$ corresponds to the BP limit and $\gamma=1$ corresponds to the exclusion principle (but ignoring perfect matching constraints) Mean-Field (MF) limit. FFE shows monotonicity and continuity with respect to $\gamma$. For every non-negative matrix, we define its special value $\gamma_*\in[-1;0]$ to be the $\gamma$ for which the minimum of the $\gamma$-parameterized FFE functional is equal to the permanent of the matrix, where the lower and upper bounds of the $\gamma$-interval corresponds to respective bounds for the permanent. Our experimental analysis suggests that the distribution of $\gamma_*$ varies for different ensembles but $\gamma_*$ always lies within the $[-1;-1/2]$ interval. Moreover, for all ensembles considered the behavior of $\gamma_*$ is highly distinctive, offering an emprirical practical guidance for estimating permanents of non-negative matrices via the FFE approach.Comment: 42 pages, 14 figure