Randomized cache placement for eliminating conflicts

Applications with regular patterns of memory access can experience high levels of cache conflict misses. In shared-memory multiprocessors conflict misses can be increased significantly by the data transpositions required for parallelization. Techniques such as blocking which are introduced within a single thread to improve locality, can result in yet more conflict misses. The tension between minimizing cache conflicts and the other transformations needed for efficient parallelization leads to complex optimization problems for parallelizing compilers. This paper shows how the introduction of a pseudorandom element into the cache index function can effectively eliminate repetitive conflict misses and produce a cache where miss ratio depends solely on working set behavior. We examine the impact of pseudorandom cache indexing on processor cycle times and present practical solutions to some of the major implementation issues for this type of cache. Our conclusions are supported by simulations of a superscalar out-of-order processor executing the SPEC95 benchmarks, as well as from cache simulations of individual loop kernels to illustrate specific effects. We present measurements of instructions committed per cycle (IPC) when comparing the performance of different cache architectures on whole-program benchmarks such as the SPEC95 suite.Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version

Effective Monte Carlo simulation on System-V massively parallel associative string processing architecture

We show that the latest version of massively parallel processing associative string processing architecture (System-V) is applicable for fast Monte Carlo simulation if an effective on-processor random number generator is implemented. Our lagged Fibonacci generator can produce $10^8$ random numbers on a processor string of 12K PE-s. The time dependent Monte Carlo algorithm of the one-dimensional non-equilibrium kinetic Ising model performs 80 faster than the corresponding serial algorithm on a 300 MHz UltraSparc.Comment: 8 pages, 9 color ps figures embedde

Low Power Processor Architectures and Contemporary Techniques for Power Optimization – A Review

The technological evolution has increased the number of transistors for a given die area significantly and increased the switching speed from few MHz to GHz range. Such inversely proportional decline in size and boost in performance consequently demands shrinking of supply voltage and effective power dissipation in chips with millions of transistors. This has triggered substantial amount of research in power reduction techniques into almost every aspect of the chip and particularly the processor cores contained in the chip. This paper presents an overview of techniques for achieving the power efficiency mainly at the processor core level but also visits related domains such as buses and memories. There are various processor parameters and features such as supply voltage, clock frequency, cache and pipelining which can be optimized to reduce the power consumption of the processor. This paper discusses various ways in which these parameters can be optimized. Also, emerging power efficient processor architectures are overviewed and research activities are discussed which should help reader identify how these factors in a processor contribute to power consumption. Some of these concepts have been already established whereas others are still active research areas. © 2009 ACADEMY PUBLISHER

SAMIE-LSQ: set-associative multiple-instruction entry load/store queue

The load/store queue (LSQ) is one of the most complex parts of contemporary processors. Its latency is critical for the processor performance and it is usually one of the processor hotspots. This paper presents a highly banked, set-associative, multiple-instruction entry LSQ (SAMIE-LSQ,) that achieves high performance with small energy requirements. The SAMIE-LSQ classifies the memory instructions (loads and stores) based on the address to be accessed, and groups those instructions accessing the same cache line in the same entry. Our approach relies on the fact that many in-flight memory instructions access the same cache lines. Each SAMIE-LSQ entry has space for several memory instructions accessing the same cache line. This arrangement has a number of advantages. First, it significantly reduces the address comparison activity needed for memory disambiguation since there are less addresses to be compared. It also reduces the activity in the data TLB, the cache tag and cache data arrays. This is achieved by caching the cache line location and address translation in the corresponding SAMIE-LSQ entry once the access of one of the instructions in an entry is performed, so instructions that share an entry can reuse the translation, avoid the tag check and get the data directly from the concrete cache way without checking the others. Besides, the delay of the proposed scheme is lower than that required by a conventional LSQ. We show that the SAMIE-LSQ saves 82% dynamic energy for the load/store queue, 42% for the LI data cache and 73% for the data TLB, with a negligible impact on performance (0.6%)Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version