Design Of Perturbative Hyper-Heuristics For Combinatorial Optimisation

Combinatorial optimisation is an area which seeks to identify optimal solution(s) from a discrete solution search space. Approaches for solving combinatorial optimisation problems can be separated into two main sub-classes, i.e. exact and approximation algorithms. Exact algorithm is a sub-class of techniques that is able to guarantee global optimality. However, exact algorithms are not feasible for solving complex problem due to its high computational overhead. Approximation algorithm is a sub-class of techniques which is able to provide sub-optimal solution(s) with reasonable computational cost. In order to explore the solution search space of a combinatorial optimisation problem, an approximation algorithm performs perturbations on the existing solutions by adopting a single or multiple perturbative Low-Level Heuristic(s) (LLHs). The use of a single LLH leads to poor performance when the particular heuristic is incompetent in solving the problem. Thus, the use of multiple LLHs is more desirable as the weaknesses of one heuristic can be compensated by the strengths of another. When there are multiple LLHs, a hyper-heuristic can be integrated to determine the choice of heuristics for a particular problem or situation. Hyper-heuristic automates the selection of LLHs through a high-level heuristic that consists of two key components, i.e. a heuristic selection method and a move acceptance method. The capability of a high-level heuristic is highly problem dependent as the landscape properties of a problem are unique among others. The high-level heuristics in the existing hyper-heuristics are designed by manually matching different combinations of high-level heuristic components

Optimal Weighting for Exam Composition

A problem faced by many instructors is that of designing exams that accurately assess the abilities of the students. Typically these exams are prepared several days in advance, and generic question scores are used based on rough approximation of the question difficulty and length. For example, for a recent class taught by the author, there were 30 multiple choice questions worth 3 points, 15 true/false with explanation questions worth 4 points, and 5 analytical exercises worth 10 points. We describe a novel framework where algorithms from machine learning are used to modify the exam question weights in order to optimize the exam scores, using the overall class grade as a proxy for a student's true ability. We show that significant error reduction can be obtained by our approach over standard weighting schemes, and we make several new observations regarding the properties of the "good" and "bad" exam questions that can have impact on the design of improved future evaluation methods

A combinatorial approximation algorithm for CDMA downlink rate allocation

This paper presents a combinatorial algorithm for downlink rate allocation in Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) mobile networks. By discretizing the coverage area into small segments, the transmit power requirements are characterized via a matrix representation that separates user and system characteristics. We obtain a closed-form analytical expression for the so-called Perron-Frobenius eigenvalue of that matrix, which provides a quick assessment of the feasibility of the power assignment for a given downlink rate allocation. Based on the Perron-Frobenius eigenvalue, we reduce the downlink rate allocation problem to a set of multiple-choice knapsack problems. The solution of these problems provides an approximation of the optimal downlink rate allocation and cell borders for which the system throughput, expressed in terms of utility functions of the users, is maximized

Submodular Optimization with Submodular Cover and Submodular Knapsack Constraints

We investigate two new optimization problems -- minimizing a submodular function subject to a submodular lower bound constraint (submodular cover) and maximizing a submodular function subject to a submodular upper bound constraint (submodular knapsack). We are motivated by a number of real-world applications in machine learning including sensor placement and data subset selection, which require maximizing a certain submodular function (like coverage or diversity) while simultaneously minimizing another (like cooperative cost). These problems are often posed as minimizing the difference between submodular functions [14, 35] which is in the worst case inapproximable. We show, however, that by phrasing these problems as constrained optimization, which is more natural for many applications, we achieve a number of bounded approximation guarantees. We also show that both these problems are closely related and an approximation algorithm solving one can be used to obtain an approximation guarantee for the other. We provide hardness results for both problems thus showing that our approximation factors are tight up to log-factors. Finally, we empirically demonstrate the performance and good scalability properties of our algorithms.Comment: 23 pages. A short version of this appeared in Advances of NIPS-201

Spectrum optimization in multi-user multi-carrier systems with iterative convex and nonconvex approximation methods

Several practical multi-user multi-carrier communication systems are characterized by a multi-carrier interference channel system model where the interference is treated as noise. For these systems, spectrum optimization is a promising means to mitigate interference. This however corresponds to a challenging nonconvex optimization problem. Existing iterative convex approximation (ICA) methods consist in solving a series of improving convex approximations and are typically implemented in a per-user iterative approach. However they do not take this typical iterative implementation into account in their design. This paper proposes a novel class of iterative approximation methods that focuses explicitly on the per-user iterative implementation, which allows to relax the problem significantly, dropping joint convexity and even convexity requirements for the approximations. A systematic design framework is proposed to construct instances of this novel class, where several new iterative approximation methods are developed with improved per-user convex and nonconvex approximations that are both tighter and simpler to solve (in closed-form). As a result, these novel methods display a much faster convergence speed and require a significantly lower computational cost. Furthermore, a majority of the proposed methods can tackle the issue of getting stuck in bad locally optimal solutions, and hence improve solution quality compared to existing ICA methods.Comment: 33 pages, 7 figures. This work has been submitted for possible publicatio