4 research outputs found

    Sandia Software Guidelines, Volume 2. Documentation

    Full text link

    Prediction for Resolution Time of Software Defect

    Get PDF
    In practical software development projects, solving test issues efficiently during Software Development Life Cycle is critical to release software products on time. Different test environments, test resources and test requirements could result in different outcomes. Therefore, getting accurate prediction of the software defects\u27 resolution time could be beneficial to the practical projects.;In our study, data mining techniques offer great promise in prediction of software defects\u27 resolution time. Our research is conducted based on the NASA Metrics Data Program (MDP). We first calculate the resolution time for available projects. Using unsupervised discretization methods, we split resolution time into certain interval as response variable. Then, investigating the relationship between metric properties and time intervals, we fit a model that attempts to produce prediction on resolution time. Experiments and analysis successfully demonstrate the feasibility of our approach

    Measuring, monitoring, and assessing software process using PAMPA 2.0 knowledge-based system

    Get PDF
    My research is about monitoring the software development process to assess Capability maturity level. Capability Maturity Model (CMM) was developed to improve the software process based on subjective assessment by teams of experts. We propose an objective CMM assessment, which replaces expensive and time-consuming human effort by a knowledge-based system. Compared to Subjective CMM assessment, Objective CMM assessment can be less expensive, takes less time, and is easy to estimate the software development environment maturity. The accuracy of Objective CMM assessment can be the same as Subjective CMM assessment if enough activities are represented as objective activities. For example, if subjective activities total 80 % and objective activities total 20 %, then the accuracy of Objective CMM assessment is not reliable. It would be reliable if the objective activity is increased up to 80% from 20%. This dissertation presents how to change from Subjective CMM assessment to Objective CMM assessment, and we will prove that Objective CMM Assessment is effective

    A quality model considering program architecture

    Full text link
    Mémoire numérisé par la Direction des bibliothèques de l'Université de Montréal
    corecore