29,161 research outputs found

    Hazard prediction discriminates between novice and experienced drivers

    Get PDF
    Typical hazard perception tests often confound multiple processes in their responses. The current study tested hazard prediction in isolation to assess whether this component can discriminate between novice and experienced drivers. A variant of the hazard perception test, based on the Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique, found experienced drivers to outperform novices across three experiments suggesting that the act of predicting an imminent hazard is a crucial part of the hazard-perception process. Furthermore three additional hypotheses were tested in these experiments. First, performance was compared across clips of different length. There was marginal evidence that novice drivers' performance suffered with the longest clips, but experienced driversโ€™ performance did not, suggesting that experienced drivers find hazard prediction less effortful. Secondly, predictive accuracy was found to be dependent on the temporal proximity of visual precursors to the hazard. Thirdly the relationship between the hazard and its precursor was found to be important, with less obvious precursors improving the discrimination between novice and experience drivers. These findings demonstrate that a measure of hazard prediction, which is less confounded by the influence of risk appraisal than simple response time measures, can still discriminate between novice and experienced drivers. Application of this methodology under different conditions can produce insights into the underlying processes that may be at work, whilst also providing an alternative test of driver skill in relation to the detection of hazards

    An object oriented Bayesian network approach for unsafe driving maneuvers prevention system

    Full text link
    ยฉ 2017 IEEE. As the main contributor to the traffic accidents, unsafe driving maneuvers have taken attentions from automobile industries. Although driving feedback systems have been developed in effort of dangerous driving reduction, it lacks of drivers awareness development. Therefore, those systems are not preventive in nature. To cover this weakness, this paper presents an approach to develop drivers awareness to prevent dangerous driving maneuvers. The approach uses Object-Oriented Bayesian Network to model hazardous situations. The result of the model can truthfully reflect a driving environment based upon situation analysis, data generated from sensors, and maneuvers detectors. In addition, it also alerts drivers when a driving situation that has high probability to cause unsafe maneuver to be detected. This model then is used to design a system, which can raise drivers awareness and prevent unsafe driving maneuvers

    Silent, Unsafe...and Underestimated?. Exploring the relationships between life stress and safety issues among spanish drivers

    Get PDF
    Almost all the recent studies addressing road safety from the approach of human factors agree that stress is one of the most considerable (but underestimated) threats for safe driving. However, evidence on the relationship between stressful life events and driver performance remains scarce. Therefore, this study aimed to assess life stress-related perceptions of Spanish drivers, as well as exploring their relationships with self-reported driving performance, decision-making and other road safety-related issues. Methods: This cross-sectional research analysed the information gathered from a nationwide sample of n=840 Spanish drivers responding to an electronic survey on psychosocial issues, stress-related factors and driving issues. The results show that a high percentage (75%) consider that stress may impair their driving performance, while 76.9% of drivers report having experienced at least one major stressful life event during the last year. Despite this relatively high awareness of the negative role of stress and its associated factors for driving safety, this study found that drivers tend to 'ignore the alarm signals', as they often reported keeping driving, even when noticing their driving fitness and performance might be impaired by stress-related factors. This study highlights the need to create and apply interventions aimed at informing and training drivers to identify, manage and cope with stress from different spheres, including stressful life events, as a means of potentially improving their driving safety habits and outcome

    Security Implications of Fog Computing on the Internet of Things

    Full text link
    Recently, the use of IoT devices and sensors has been rapidly increased which also caused data generation (information and logs), bandwidth usage, and related phenomena to be increased. To our best knowledge, a standard definition for the integration of fog computing with IoT is emerging now. This integration will bring many opportunities for the researchers, especially while building cyber-security related solutions. In this study, we surveyed about the integration of fog computing with IoT and its implications. Our goal was to find out and emphasize problems, specifically security related problems that arise with the employment of fog computing by IoT. According to our findings, although this integration seems to be non-trivial and complicated, it has more benefits than the implications.Comment: 5 pages, conference paper, to appear in Proceedings of the ICCE 2019, IEEE 37th International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE), Jan 11- 13, 2019, Las Vegas, NV, US

    Chitosan-zinc oxide composite for active food packaging Applications

    Get PDF
    Chitosan-zinc oxide (C-ZnO) films were prepared by a simple one pot procedure. In order to investigate the property of C-ZnO films, two composite films were prepared by varying the loading of ZnO and compared with pure chitosan film (C). The films were character-ized by various techniques such as FTIR, DSC, tensile, contact angle and water vapour permeability. FTIR analysis showed changes in hydrogen bonds band at 3351 cm-1 compared to pure chitosan film. The incorporation of ZnO in chitosan films increased the contact angle by 30.5% in C-ZnO1.0 film while water vapour transmission rate decreased by 7.8% compared to C film. From the tensile test, C-ZnO0.5 and C-ZnO1.0 films were found to be much superior by 1.5 times and 2.5 times respectively compared to bare chitosan film. Larger inhibition ring (by 47%) was exhibited by C-ZnO1.0 as compared to C-ZnO0.5 when tested against S.aureus. From the results, it is displayed that the incorporation of zinc oxide to chitosan improve their properties which also shown the potential to become a candi-date for food active packaging

    'ํƒ‘์Šน์ž'์˜ ๊ด€์ ์˜ ์‹œ๊ฐ„, ์œ„์น˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ํด๋Ÿฌ์Šคํ„ฐ UI ๋””์ž์ธ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„ ์ œ์•ˆ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :๋ฏธ์ˆ ๋Œ€ํ•™ ๋””์ž์ธํ•™๋ถ€ ๋””์ž์ธ์ „๊ณต,2019. 8. ์ •์˜์ฒ .One important design issue is the examination of how the user interface (UI) supports the new user role in future mobility. However, there are few design studies on the passengers cognitive needs and behavior in Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) based on empirical data. There is no doubt that autonomous mobility technologies are growing. The technology is already aiding the driving experience, and it will change the mobility culture and the transition of driver into passenger. This study is based on the premise that future AV is capable of performing all driving tasks. It proposes a set of passenger-centered automotive cluster UI designs for future mobility employing two factors: time and path. A set of empirical data is provided to understand the passengers perspective. In this study, a solid set of empirical data on the cognitive needs of passengers is collected. Human cognitive characteristics and driving tasks are investigated from various viewpoints to understand the passengers iii perspective. The cognitive relationship in the driving environment is analyzed through a literature review on situation awareness (SA) and structuring of the data flow framework. The framework is further explored by connecting the technological role transformation to the passenger. To construct the empirical database on the passenger, three sets of user tests and in-depth interviews were undertaken. The user tests were designed employing the Wizard of Oz method, and the results were summarized using descriptive and exploratory analysis. Based on these insights, a set of UI designs from the perspective of the passenger was proposed, and usability tests were conducted to verify its effectiveness and usability. The results of the tests demonstrate that a major percentage of the information request was related to time (current time and duration) and path (vehicle location and surroundings). Based on the data, a UI framework was built. Two usage scenarios were designed, time-full and time-less, for better in-situation comprehension. Time- and path-based UI were proposed to flow with the scenarios. A usability test was conducted, and a passengers cognitive framework was defined. There are two aspects to this study: the data flow frameworks of the driver/passenger, and the UI design proposal. Situational precision from the perspective of the driver was analyzed to understand the relationship between the user, the vehicle and the road conditions. Further, the cognitive framework of the passenger was proposed based on the data. This study provides a solid understanding of drivers emerging needs when they are relieved of the cognitive burden of driving tasks. The UI features for AV are introduced based on the empirical data and research related to the provision of better situation awareness, focusing on time and location. This study contributes to the extant literature by observing the iv perspective of passengers in Autonomous vehicles based on a qualitative study. The proposed UI design will be further explored as a communication method between the system and the passive user in future mobility.์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์ธํ„ฐํŽ˜์ด์Šค๊ฐ€ (UI) ๋ฏธ๋ž˜ ์ด๋™์„ฑ์—์„œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์—ญํ• ์„ ์ง€์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ๋””์ž์ธ ๋„์ถœ์€ ๋ฏธ๋ž˜ ์ด๋™์„ฑ ๋ถ„์•ผ์—์„œ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๋””์ž์ธ ์ด์Šˆ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์‹คํ—˜์— ๊ทผ๊ฑฐํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ (AV) ์˜ ํƒ‘์Šน์ž์ธ์ง€ ์š•๊ตฌ์™€ ํ–‰๋™์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋””์ž์ธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ฏธ๋ฏธํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰์ด ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ๋ฐœ์ „๊ณผ ๊ทธ ์˜์—ญ์€ ์ ์ฐจ ๋„“์–ด์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ•ด๋‹น ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์€ ์ด๋ฏธ ์šด์ „ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์— ์ ์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋ฏธ๋ž˜ ์ด๋™๋ฌธํ™”์—์„œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์˜ ์—ญํ• ์€ '์šด์ „์ž'์—์„œ 'ํƒ‘์Šน์ž'๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™”ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋ฏธ๋ž˜ ์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์ด ๋ชจ๋“  ์šด์ „ ์ƒํ™ฉ์— ๋Œ€์ฒ˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์ „์ œ๋กœ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ํƒ‘์Šน์ž์˜ ๊ด€์ ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ถ„์„์„ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ๋ฏธ๋ž˜ ๋ชจ๋นŒ๋ฆฌํ‹ฐ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์— ์ ์šฉ๋  ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์ธํ„ฐํŽ˜์ด์Šค๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๋””์ž์ธ์€ ์šด์ „์ž ์ค‘์‹ฌ์˜ ์ƒํ™ฉ์ธ์ง€์—์„œ ๋ฒ—์–ด๋‚˜ ํƒ‘์Šน์ž ์ค‘์‹ฌ ์ธ์ง€ ์ •๋ณด ์š”์†Œ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ณผ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์š”์†Œ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ•œ UI ๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ํƒ‘์Šน์ž์˜ ์ธ์ง€ ์ •๋ณด ์š”๊ตฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜์  ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํƒ‘์Šน์ž์˜ ๊ด€์ ์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ์ธ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ธ์ง€์  ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์šด์ „ ํƒœ์Šคํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์ƒํ™ฉ์ธ์ง€ (SA) ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ๋ฌธํ—Œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์™€ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ ๊ตฌ์กฐํ™”๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์šด์ „ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ์ธ์ง€์  ์š”์†Œ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์ˆ  ๋ณ€ํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์šด์ „์ž๊ฐ€ ํƒ‘์Šน์ž๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋˜์—ˆ์„ ๋•Œ ์šด์ „ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๊ด€๊ณ„ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์‹œ๊ฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์กฐํ™”ํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹ฌ์ธต์ ์œผ๋กœ ํƒ๊ตฌ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํƒ‘์Šน์ž์˜ ์ธ์ง€ ๋‹ˆ์ฆˆ ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜์  ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ด 3 ์„ธํŠธ์˜ ์œ ์ € ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ์™€ ์‹ฌ์ธต ์ธํ„ฐ๋ทฐ๊ฐ€ ์ˆ˜๋ฐ˜๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์œ ์ € ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋Š” Wizard of Oz ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์„ค๊ณ„๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์งˆ์  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์˜ ๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ถ„์„๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์–ป์€ ์ธ์‚ฌ์ดํŠธ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ํƒ‘์Šน์ž ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ UI ๋””์ž์ธ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๊ณ  ์‚ฌ์šฉ์„ฑ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ๊ณผ ์œ ์šฉ์„ฑ์„ 5 ์  ๋ฆฌ ์ปคํŠธ ์Šค์ผ€์ผ๋กœ์จ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋ฉด ํƒ‘์Šน์ž๊ฐ€ ์š”์ฒญํ•œ ์ธ์ง€ ์ •๋ณด๋Š” ์‹œ๊ฐ„ (ํ˜„์žฌ ์‹œ๊ฐ ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„)๊ณผ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ (์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ์œ„์น˜ ๋ฐ ์ฃผ๋ณ€ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ)์— ์ง‘์ค‘๋œ ๊ฒƒ์„ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ UI ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ƒํ™ฉ ์†์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋ก€๋ฅผ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ๋„ ๊ฐ€์ง€ time-full ๊ณผ time-less ์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•˜๊ณ , ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ณผ ์œ„์น˜์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ UI ๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ UI ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์„ฑ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฅผ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ํƒ‘์Šน์ž ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ์˜ ์šด์ „์ƒํ™ฉ ์ธ์ง€ ์›Œํฌ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์„ ์™„์„ฑํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๊ฐ€์น˜๋Š” ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋กœ ์ •๋ฆฌ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜๋‚˜๋Š” ์šด์ „์ž / ํƒ‘์Šน์ž์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ํ”Œ๋กœ์šฐ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๊ณผ ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ๋Š” ํƒ‘์Šน์ž์˜ ๊ด€์ ์„ ์ง€์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” UI ๋””์ž์ธ ์ œ์•ˆ์— ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์šด์ „์ž์˜ ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ์˜ ์šด์ „ ์ƒํ™ฉ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž, ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๋„๋กœ ์ƒํƒœ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์‹œ๊ฐํ™”ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์ด๋Š” ํƒ‘์Šน์ž์ธ์ง€ ํ”Œ๋กœ์šฐ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์กฐ์ ์ธ ํ‹€๋กœ์จ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์šด์ „ ํƒœ์Šคํฌ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ์— ํ•„์š”ํ–ˆ๋˜ ์ธ์ง€ ๋ถ€๋‹ด์—์„œ ๋ฒ—์–ด๋‚ฌ์„ ๋•Œ์˜ ์šด์ „์ž๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”๋กœ ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ณตํ•ฉ์ ์ธ ๋‹ˆ์ฆˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ฏธ๋ž˜ ๋ชจ๋นŒ๋ฆฌํ‹ฐ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์— ์ ํ•ฉํ•œ UI ์˜ ๋””์ž์ธ ์š”์†Œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค. ๋ฏธ๋ž˜ ์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰ ์•ˆ์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž ์ธํ„ฐํŽ˜์ด์Šค๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ–์ถ”์–ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋Š” ์š”์†Œ๋ฅผ ์‹คํ—˜์  ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์— ๊ทผ๊ฑฐํ•˜์—ฌ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ณผ ๋ฃจํŠธ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ•˜์—ฌ ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋œ ์ƒํ™ฉ ์ธ์ง€๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹ฌ๋„์žˆ๋Š” ๊ด€์ฐฐ์„ ๊ธฐ๋กํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์งˆ์  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์— ๊ธฐ์ดˆํ•œ ์ž์œจ ์ฐจ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ํƒ‘์Šน์ž ๊ด€์ ์„ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๊ธฐ์กด ์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰์ด ๋””์ž์ธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์— ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ UI ๋””์ž์ธ ๋ฏธ๋ž˜ ์ด๋™ ์„ฑ์•ˆ์—์„œ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ๊ณผ ํƒ‘์Šน์ž ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ปค๋ฎค๋‹ˆ์ผ€์ด์…˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋กœ์จ ๊ทธ ์˜์˜๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค.ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................... II CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION......................................................................................... ๏ผ‘ 1.1. BACKGROUND ..............................................................................................................๏ผ‘ 1.2. PURPOSE .....................................................................................................................๏ผ— 1.3. RESEARCH QUESTION.....................................................................................................๏ผ˜ CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW ..............................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ‘ 2.1. SITATION AWARENESS (SA) ........................................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ‘ 2.2. HUMAN INFORMATION PROCESSING MODEL..................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ• 2.3. DRIVING SITUATION AWARENESS AND PERSPECTIVE.........................................................๏ผ’๏ผ 2.4. DRIVING TASK AND SENSORY INTERACTION ....................................................................๏ผ’๏ผ’ CHAPTER 3. COGNITIVE NEEDS IN AUTONOMOUS.....................................................๏ผ’๏ผ— 3.1. DRIVING BEHAVIOR TRANSFORMATION AND CLUSTER UI..................................................๏ผ’๏ผ— 3.2. COGNITIVE FRAMEWORK TRANSFORMATION ..................................................................๏ผ“๏ผ“ CHAPTER 4. USER TESTS ............................................................................................๏ผ“๏ผ– 4.1. WIZARD OF OZ PROTOTYPING .....................................................................................๏ผ“๏ผ˜ 4.2. PILOT TEST 1............................................................................................................๏ผ”๏ผ 4.2.1. Experiment Design & Laboratory Setting.................................................๏ผ”๏ผ 4.2.2. Persona Scenario & Task Design ..............................................................๏ผ”๏ผ’ 4.2.3. Preparation of Driving situation...............................................................๏ผ”๏ผ• 4.2.4. Procedure.................................................................................................๏ผ”๏ผ— 4.2.5. Data Analysis & Insight............................................................................๏ผ”๏ผ˜ 4.3. PILOT TEST 2............................................................................................................๏ผ•๏ผ‘ 4.3.1. Amendment: Experiment Design & Laboratory Setting ...........................๏ผ•๏ผ’ 4.3.2. Amendment: Task Scenario & Command Cue..........................................๏ผ•๏ผ” 4.3.3. Amendment: Perform Role and preparation of driving situation ............๏ผ•๏ผ— 4.3.4. Amendment: Procedure ...........................................................................๏ผ•๏ผ™ 4.3.5. Data Analysis & Insight............................................................................๏ผ–๏ผ’ 4.4. MAIN TEST ..............................................................................................................๏ผ–๏ผ• 4.4.1. Experiment Design & Laboratory setting .................................................๏ผ–๏ผ– 4.4.2. Task Design ..............................................................................................๏ผ–๏ผ™ 4.4.3. Procedure.................................................................................................๏ผ—๏ผ‘ 4.4.4. Result Analysis & Insight..........................................................................๏ผ—๏ผ” CHAPTER 5. UI CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT...................................................................๏ผ˜๏ผ‘ 5.1. UI DESIGN METHOD..................................................................................................๏ผ˜๏ผ‘ 5.2. DESIGN PROPOSAL ....................................................................................................๏ผ˜๏ผ” 5.3. USER SCENARIOS ......................................................................................................๏ผ˜๏ผ– 5.3.1 Scenario 1. Time-less: Late for a morning meeting..................................๏ผ˜๏ผ– 5.3.2 Scenario 2.Time-full: Leisure driving on weekends ..................................๏ผ™๏ผ“ CHAPTER 6. USABILITY TEST ......................................................................................๏ผ™๏ผ˜ 6.1. USABILITY TEST GUIDE ...............................................................................................๏ผ™๏ผ˜ 6.2. ASSESSMENT USABILITY TEST ..................................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ๏ผ 6.2.1 Test planning........................................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ๏ผ 6.2.2 Laboratory setting................................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ๏ผ’ 6.2.3 Test conduct and debriefing.................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ๏ผ– 6.3. RESULT ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ๏ผ– CHAPTER 7. CONCLUSION......................................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ๏ผ— APPENDIX 1...........................................................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ‘๏ผ APPENDIX 2...........................................................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ‘๏ผ‘ APPENDIX 3...........................................................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ‘๏ผ“ APPENDIX 4...........................................................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ’๏ผ‘ APPENDIX 5...........................................................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ’๏ผ” APPENDIX 6...........................................................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ’๏ผ˜ APPENDIX 7...........................................................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ“๏ผ“ BIBLIOGRAPHY ......................................................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ“๏ผ– ๊ตญ๋ฌธ ์ดˆ๋ก ............................................................................................................๏ผ‘๏ผ”๏ผ“Maste

    The effect of a secondary task on driversโ€™ gap acceptance and situational awareness at junctions

    Get PDF
    The current studies explored the roles of the visuospatial and phonological working memory subsystems on driversโ€™ gap acceptance and memory for approaching vehicles at junctions. Driversโ€™ behaviour was measured in a high-fidelity driving simulator when at a junction, with, and without a visuospatial or phonological load. When asked to judge when to advance across the junction, gap acceptance thresholds, memory for vehicles and eye movements were not different when there was a secondary task compared to control. However, driversโ€™ secondary task performance was more impaired in the visuospatial than phonological domain. These findings suggest that drivers were able to accept impairment in the secondary task while maintaining appropriate safety margins and situational awareness. These findings can inform the development of in-car technologies, improving the safety of road users at junctions. Practitioner summary: Despite research indicating that concurrent performance on working memory tasks impairs driving, a matched visuospatial or phonological memory load did not change driversโ€™ gap acceptance or situational awareness at junctions. Drivers displayed appropriate compensatory behaviour by prioritising the driving task over the visuospatial secondary task. Abbreviations: ROW: right of way; RIG: random time interval generatio

    How to keep drivers engaged while supervising driving automation? A literature survey and categorization of six solution areas

    Get PDF
    This work aimed to organise recommendations for keeping people engaged during human supervision of driving automation, encouraging a safe and acceptable introduction of automated driving systems. First, heuristic knowledge of human factors, ergonomics, and psychological theory was used to propose solution areas to human supervisory control problems of sustained attention. Driving and non-driving research examples were drawn to substantiate the solution areas. Automotive manufacturers might (1) avoid this supervisory role altogether, (2) reduce it in objective ways or (3) alter its subjective experiences, (4) utilize conditioning learning principles such as with gamification and/or selection/training techniques, (5) support internal driver cognitive processes and mental models and/or (6) leverage externally situated information regarding relations between the driver, the driving task, and the driving environment. Second, a cross-domain literature survey of influential human-automation interaction research was conducted for how to keep engagement/attention in supervisory control. The solution areas (via numeric theme codes) were found to be reliably applied from independent rater categorisations of research recommendations. Areas (5) and (6) were addressed by around 70% or more of the studies, areas (2) and (4) in around 50% of the studies, and areas (3) and (1) in less than around 20% and 5%, respectively. The present contribution offers a guiding organisational framework towards improving human attention while supervising driving automation.submittedVersio

    The โ€˜frontal lobeโ€™ project: A double-blind, randomized controlled study of the effectiveness of higher level driving skills training to improve frontal lobe (executive) function related driving performance in young drivers

    Get PDF
    The current study was undertaken in order to evaluate the effectiveness of higher level skills training on safe driving behaviour of 36 teenage drivers. The participants, who attended the Driver Training Research camp in Taupo (NZ) over a two week period, were 16 to 17 years old and had a valid restricted driver licence. The study focused on four main aims. Firstly, the behavioural characteristics of the sample and their attitudes to risk taking and driving were examined. Results showed that speeding was the most anticipated driving violation, and high levels of confidence were associated with a higher number of crashes and a greater propensity for risk taking. Many, often male participants, also rated their driving skills as superior to others and thought they would be less likely than others to be involved in an accident. Secondly, the relationship between driving performance and executive functioning, general ability and sustained attention was evaluated. Overall, better driving performance and more accurate self-evaluation of driving performance was related to higher levels of executive functions, in particular, working memory, and cognitive switching. In addition, higher general ability and greater ability to sustain attention were also linked to better performance on the driving related assessments. The third focus of this study was to compare the effects of both, higher level and vehicle handling skills training on driving performance, confidence levels and attitudes to risk. While both types of training improved direction control, speed choice and visual search, along with number of hazards detected and actions in relation to hazards, statistically significant improvement on visual search was seen only after higher level skills training. Vehicle handling skills training significantly improved direction control and speed choice. In addition, confidence levels in their driving skills were significantly lowered and attitudes to speeding, overtaking and close following had improved significantly in the participants after the higher level driving skills training. The final aspect to this study was to examine the effects of the training over the following 6 month period based on self-reported driving behaviour. The response rate of participants however, was not sufficient to reach any meaningful conclusion on any long-term training effects. A pilot study using GPSbased data trackers to assess post-training driving behaviour revealed some promising results for future driver training evaluation studies. The overall implications of the results are discussed in relation to improving the safety of young drivers in New Zealand
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore