On inferring intentions in shared tasks for industrial collaborative robots

Inferring human operators' actions in shared collaborative tasks, plays a crucial role in enhancing the cognitive capabilities of industrial robots. In all these incipient collaborative robotic applications, humans and robots not only should share space but also forces and the execution of a task. In this article, we present a robotic system which is able to identify different human's intentions and to adapt its behavior consequently, only by means of force data. In order to accomplish this aim, three major contributions are presented: (a) force-based operator's intent recognition, (b) force-based dataset of physical human-robot interaction and (c) validation of the whole system in a scenario inspired by a realistic industrial application. This work is an important step towards a more natural and user-friendly manner of physical human-robot interaction in scenarios where humans and robots collaborate in the accomplishment of a task.Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version

The role of haptic communication in dyadic collaborative object manipulation tasks

Intuitive and efficient physical human-robot collaboration relies on the mutual observability of the human and the robot, i.e. the two entities being able to interpret each other's intentions and actions. This is remedied by a myriad of methods involving human sensing or intention decoding, as well as human-robot turn-taking and sequential task planning. However, the physical interaction establishes a rich channel of communication through forces, torques and haptics in general, which is often overlooked in industrial implementations of human-robot interaction. In this work, we investigate the role of haptics in human collaborative physical tasks, to identify how to integrate physical communication in human-robot teams. We present a task to balance a ball at a target position on a board either bimanually by one participant, or dyadically by two participants, with and without haptic information. The task requires that the two sides coordinate with each other, in real-time, to balance the ball at the target. We found that with training the completion time and number of velocity peaks of the ball decreased, and that participants gradually became consistent in their braking strategy. Moreover we found that the presence of haptic information improved the performance (decreased completion time) and led to an increase in overall cooperative movements. Overall, our results show that humans can better coordinate with one another when haptic feedback is available. These results also highlight the likely importance of haptic communication in human-robot physical interaction, both as a tool to infer human intentions and to make the robot behaviour interpretable to humans

A Model of Continuous Intention Grounding for HRI

Hough J, Schlangen D. A Model of Continuous Intention Grounding for HRI. Presented at the “The Role of Intentions in Human-Robot Interaction" workshop in conjunction with the 12th ACM / IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI 2017), Vienna

Monitoring and Managing Interaction Patterns in Human-Robot Interaction

Nowadays, one of the most challenging problems in Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) is to make robots able to understand humans to successfully accomplish tasks in human environments. HRI has a very different role in all the robotics fields. While autonomous robots do not require a complex HRI system, it is of vital importance for service robots. The goal of this thesis is to study if behavioural patterns that users unconsciously apply when interacting with a robot can be useful to recognise the users' intentions in a particular situation. To carry out this study a prototype has been developed to test in an automatic and objective way, if those interaction patterns performed by several users in the area of service robots are useful to recognise their intentions and disambiguate unclear situations.By using verbal and non-verbal communication that the user unconsciously applies when interacting with a robot, we want to determine automatically what the user is trying to present

Redundancy resolution in human-robot co-manipulation with cartesian impedance control

In this paper the role of redundancy in Cartesian impedance control of a robotic arm for the execution of tasks in co-manipulation with humans is considered. In particular, the problem of stability is experimentally investigated. When a human operator guides the robot through direct physical interaction, it is desirable to have a compliant behaviour at the end effector according to a decoupled impedance dynamics. In order to achieve a desired impedance behaviour, the robot’s dynamics has to be suitably reshaped by the controller. Moreover, the stability of the coupled human-robot system should be guaranteed for any value of the impedance parameters within a prescribed region. If the robot is kinematically or functionally redundant, also the redundant degrees of freedom can be used to modify the robot dynamics. Through an extensive experimental study on a 7-DOF KUKA LWR4 arm, we compare two different strategies to solve redundancy and we show that, when redundancy is exploited to ensure a decoupled apparent inertia at the end effector, the stability region in the parameter space becomes larger. Thus, better performance can be achieved by using, e.g., variable impedance control laws tuned to human intentions

Monitoring and managing interaction patterns in Human-Robot interaction

Nowadays, one of the most challenging problems in Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) is to make robots able to understand humans to successfully accomplish tasks in human environments. HRI has a very different role in all the robotics fields. While autonomous robots do not require a complex HRI system, it is of vital importance for service robots. The goal of this thesis is to study if behavioural patterns that users unconsciously apply when interacting with a robot can be useful to recognise the users’ intentions in a particular situation. To carry out this study a prototype has been developed to test in an automatic and objective way, if those interaction patterns performed by several users in the area of service robots are useful to recognise their intentions and disambiguate unclear situations

Can Robots Earn Our Trust the Same Way Humans Do?

Robots increasingly act as our social counterparts in domains such as healthcare and retail. For these human-robot interactions (HRI) to be effective, a question arises on whether we trust robots the same way we trust humans. We investigated whether the determinants competence and warmth, known to influence interpersonal trust development, influence trust development in HRI, and what role anthropomorphism plays in this interrelation. In two online studies with 2 × 2 between-subjects design, we investigated the role of robot competence (Study 1) and robot warmth (Study 2) in trust development in HRI. Each study explored the role of robot anthropomorphism in the respective interrelation. Videos showing an HRI were used for manipulations of robot competence (through varying gameplay competence) and robot anthropomorphism (through verbal and non-verbal design cues and the robot's presentation within the study introduction) in Study 1 (n = 155) as well as robot warmth (through varying compatibility of intentions with the human player) and robot anthropomorphism (same as Study 1) in Study 2 (n = 157). Results show a positive effect of robot competence (Study 1) and robot warmth (Study 2) on trust development in robots regarding anticipated trust and attributed trustworthiness. Subjective perceptions of competence (Study 1) and warmth (Study 2) mediated the interrelations in question. Considering applied manipulations, robot anthropomorphism neither moderated interrelations of robot competence and trust (Study 1) nor robot warmth and trust (Study 2). Considering subjective perceptions, perceived anthropomorphism moderated the effect of perceived competence (Study 1) and perceived warmth (Study 2) on trust on an attributional level. Overall results support the importance of robot competence and warmth for trust development in HRI and imply transferability regarding determinants of trust development in interpersonal interaction to HRI. Results indicate a possible role of perceived anthropomorphism in these interrelations and support a combined consideration of these variables in future studies. Insights deepen the understanding of key variables and their interaction in trust dynamics in HRI and suggest possibly relevant design factors to enable appropriate trust levels and a resulting desirable HRI. Methodological and conceptual limitations underline benefits of a rather robot-specific approach for future research