Exploiting the similarity of non-matching terms at retrieval time

In classic information retrieval systems a relevant document will not be retrieved in response to a query if the document and query representations do not share at least one term. This problem, known as 'term mismatch', has been recognised for a long time by the information retrieval community and a number of possible solutions have been proposed. Here I present a preliminary investigation into a new class of retrieval models that attempt to solve the term mismatch problem by exploiting complete or partial knowledge of term similarity in the term space. The use of term similarity can enhance classic retrieval models by taking into account non-matching terms. The theoretical advantages and drawbacks of these models are presented and compared with other models tackling the same problem. A preliminary experimental investigation into the performance gain achieved by exploiting term similarity with the proposed models is presented and discussed

Clustering Based Classification and Analysis of Data

This paper presents Clustering Based Document classification and analysis of data. The proposed Clustering Based classification and analysis of data approach is based on Unsupervised and Supervised Document Classification. In this paper Unsupervised Document and Supervised Document Classification are used. In this approach Document collection, Text Preprocessing, Feature Selection, Indexing, Clustering Process and Results Analysis steps are used. Twenty News group data sets [20] are used in the Experiments. For experimental results analysis evaluated using the Analytical SAS 9.0 Software is used. The Experimental Results show the proposed approach out performs

A framework for evaluating automatic indexing or classification in the context of retrieval

Tools for automatic subject assignment help deal with scale and sustainability in creating and enriching metadata, establishing more connections across and between resources and enhancing consistency. While some software vendors and experimental researchers claim the tools can replace manual subject indexing, hard scientific evidence of their performance in operating information environments is scarce. A major reason for this is that research is usually conducted in laboratory conditions, excluding the complexities of real-life systems and situations. The paper reviews and discusses issues with existing evaluation approaches such as problems of aboutness and relevance assessments, implying the need to use more than a single “gold standard” method when evaluating indexing and retrieval and proposes a comprehensive evaluation framework. The framework is informed by a systematic review of the literature on indexing, classification and approaches: evaluating indexing quality directly through assessment by an evaluator or through comparison with a gold standard; evaluating the quality of computer-assisted indexing directly in the context of an indexing workflow, and evaluating indexing quality indirectly through analyzing retrieval performance

The Effectiveness of Query-Based Hierarchic Clustering of Documents for Information Retrieval

Hierarchic document clustering has been applied to Information Retrieval (IR) for over three decades. Its introduction to IR was based on the grounds of its potential to improve the effectiveness of IR systems. Central to the issue of improved effectiveness is the Cluster Hypothesis. The hypothesis states that relevant documents tend to be highly similar to each other, and therefore tend to appear in the same clusters. However, previous research has been inconclusive as to whether document clustering does bring improvements. The main motivation for this work has been to investigate methods for the improvement of the effectiveness of document clustering, by challenging some assumptions that implicitly characterise its application. Such assumptions relate to the static manner in which document clustering is typically performed, and include the static application of document clustering prior to querying, and the static calculation of interdocument associations. The type of clustering that is investigated in this thesis is query-based, that is, it incorporates information from the query into the process of generating clusters of documents. Two approaches for incorporating query information into the clustering process are examined: clustering documents which are returned from an IR system in response to a user query (post-retrieval clustering), and clustering documents by using query-sensitive similarity measures. For the first approach, post-retrieval clustering, an analytical investigation into a number of issues that relate to its retrieval effectiveness is presented in this thesis. This is in contrast to most of the research which has employed post-retrieval clustering in the past, where it is mainly viewed as a convenient and efficient means of presenting documents to users. In this thesis, post-retrieval clustering is employed based on its potential to introduce effectiveness improvements compared both to static clustering and best-match IR systems. The motivation for the second approach, the use of query-sensitive measures, stems from the role of interdocument similarities for the validity of the cluster hypothesis. In this thesis, an axiomatic view of the hypothesis is proposed, by suggesting that documents relevant to the same query (co-relevant documents) display an inherent similarity to each other which is dictated by the query itself. Because of this inherent similarity, the cluster hypothesis should be valid for any document collection. Past research has attributed failure to validate the hypothesis for a document collection to characteristics of the collection. Contrary to this, the view proposed in this thesis suggests that failure of a document set to adhere to the hypothesis is attributed to the assumptions made about interdocument similarity. This thesis argues that the query determines the context and the purpose for which the similarity between documents is judged, and it should therefore be incorporated in the similarity calculations. By taking the query into account when calculating interdocument similarities, co-relevant documents can be "forced" to be more similar to each other. This view challenges the typically static nature of interdocument relationships in IR. Specific formulas for the calculation of query-sensitive similarity are proposed in this thesis. Four hierarchic clustering methods and six document collections are used in the experiments. Three main issues are investigated: the effectiveness of hierarchic post-retrieval clustering which uses static similarity measures, the effectiveness of query-sensitive measures at increasing the similarity of pairs of co-relevant documents, and the effectiveness of hierarchic clustering which uses query-sensitive similarity measures. The results demonstrate the effectiveness improvements that are introduced by the use of both approaches of query-based clustering, compared both to the effectiveness of static clustering and to the effectiveness of best-match IR systems. Query-sensitive similarity measures, in particular, introduce significant improvements over the use of static similarity measures for document clustering, and they also significantly improve the structure of the document space in terms of the similarity of pairs of co-relevant documents. The results provide evidence for the effectiveness of hierarchic query-based clustering of documents, and also challenge findings of previous research which had dismissed the potential of hierarchic document clustering as an effective method for information retrieval

Compound key word generation from document databases using a hierarchical clustering art model

The growing availability of databases on the information highways motivates the development of new processing tools able to deal with a heterogeneous and changing information environment. A highly desirable feature of data processing systems handling this type of information is the ability to automatically extract its own key words. In this paper we address the specific problem of creating semantic term associations from a text database. The proposed method uses a hierarchical model made up of Fuzzy Adaptive Resonance Theory (ART) neural networks. First, the system uses several Fuzzy ART modules to cluster isolated words into semantic classes, starting from the database raw text. Next, this knowledge is used together with coocurrence information to extract semantically meaningful term associations. These associations are asymmetric and one-to-many due to the polisemy phenomenon. The strength of the associations between words can be measured numerically. Besides this, they implicitly define a hierarchy between descriptors. The underlying algorithm is appropriate for employment on large databases. The operation of the system is illustrated on several real databases

Concepts and Effectiveness of the Cover Coefficient Based Clustering Methodology for Text Databases

An algorithm for document clustering is introduced. The base concept of the algorithm, Cover Coefficient (CC) concept, provides means of estimating the number of clusters within a document database. The CC concept is used also to identify the cluster seeds, to form clusters with the seeds, and to calculate Term Discrimination and Document Significance values (TDV, DSV). TDVs and DSVs are used to optimize document descriptions. The CC concept also relates indexing and clustering analytically. Experimental results indicate that the clustering performance in terms of the percentage of useful information accessed (precision) is forty percent higher, with accompanying reduction in search space, than that of random assignment of documents to clusters. The experiments have validated the indexing-clustering relationships and shown improvements in retrieval precision when TDV and DSV optimizations are used

Efficiency and effectiveness of query processing in cluster-based retrieval

Our research shows that for large databases, without considerable additional storage overhead, cluster-based retrieval (CBR) can compete with the time efficiency and effectiveness of the inverted index-based full search (FS). The proposed CBR method employs a storage structure that blends the cluster membership information into the inverted file posting lists. This approach significantly reduces the cost of similarity calculations for document ranking during query processing and improves efficiency. For example, in terms of in-memory computations, our new approach can reduce query processing time to 39% of FS. The experiments confirm that the approach is scalable and system performance improves with increasing database size. In the experiments, we use the cover coefficient-based clustering methodology (C3M), and the Financial Times database of TREC containing 210158 documents of size 564 MB defined by 229748 terms with total of 29545234 inverted index elements. This study provides CBR efficiency and effectiveness experiments using the largest corpus in an environment that employs no user interaction or user behavior assumption for clustering. © 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved