259 research outputs found
Tight Inefficiency Bounds for Perception-Parameterized Affine Congestion Games
Congestion games constitute an important class of non-cooperative games which
was introduced by Rosenthal in 1973. In recent years, several extensions of
these games were proposed to incorporate aspects that are not captured by the
standard model. Examples of such extensions include the incorporation of risk
sensitive players, the modeling of altruistic player behavior and the
imposition of taxes on the resources. These extensions were studied intensively
with the goal to obtain a precise understanding of the inefficiency of
equilibria of these games. In this paper, we introduce a new model of
congestion games that captures these extensions (and additional ones) in a
unifying way. The key idea here is to parameterize both the perceived cost of
each player and the social cost function of the system designer. Intuitively,
each player perceives the load induced by the other players by an extent of
{\rho}, while the system designer estimates that each player perceives the load
of all others by an extent of {\sigma}. The above mentioned extensions reduce
to special cases of our model by choosing the parameters {\rho} and {\sigma}
accordingly. As in most related works, we concentrate on congestion games with
affine latency functions here. Despite the fact that we deal with a more
general class of congestion games, we manage to derive tight bounds on the
price of anarchy and the price of stability for a large range of pa- rameters.
Our bounds provide a complete picture of the inefficiency of equilibria for
these perception-parameterized congestion games. As a result, we obtain tight
bounds on the price of anarchy and the price of stability for the above
mentioned extensions. Our results also reveal how one should "design" the cost
functions of the players in order to reduce the price of anar- chy
Price of Anarchy for Non-atomic Congestion Games with Stochastic Demands
We generalize the notions of user equilibrium and system optimum to
non-atomic congestion games with stochastic demands. We establish upper bounds
on the price of anarchy for three different settings of link cost functions and
demand distributions, namely, (a) affine cost functions and general
distributions, (b) polynomial cost functions and general positive-valued
distributions, and (c) polynomial cost functions and the normal distributions.
All the upper bounds are tight in some special cases, including the case of
deterministic demands.Comment: 31 page
Price of Anarchy in Bernoulli Congestion Games with Affine Costs
We consider an atomic congestion game in which each player participates in
the game with an exogenous and known probability , independently
of everybody else, or stays out and incurs no cost. We first prove that the
resulting game is potential. Then, we compute the parameterized price of
anarchy to characterize the impact of demand uncertainty on the efficiency of
selfish behavior. It turns out that the price of anarchy as a function of the
maximum participation probability is a nondecreasing
function. The worst case is attained when players have the same participation
probabilities . For the case of affine costs, we provide an
analytic expression for the parameterized price of anarchy as a function of
. This function is continuous on , is equal to for , and increases towards when . Our work can be interpreted as
providing a continuous transition between the price of anarchy of nonatomic and
atomic games, which are the extremes of the price of anarchy function we
characterize. We show that these bounds are tight and are attained on routing
games -- as opposed to general congestion games -- with purely linear costs
(i.e., with no constant terms).Comment: 29 pages, 6 figure
Routing Games over Time with FIFO policy
We study atomic routing games where every agent travels both along its
decided edges and through time. The agents arriving on an edge are first lined
up in a \emph{first-in-first-out} queue and may wait: an edge is associated
with a capacity, which defines how many agents-per-time-step can pop from the
queue's head and enter the edge, to transit for a fixed delay. We show that the
best-response optimization problem is not approximable, and that deciding the
existence of a Nash equilibrium is complete for the second level of the
polynomial hierarchy. Then, we drop the rationality assumption, introduce a
behavioral concept based on GPS navigation, and study its worst-case efficiency
ratio to coordination.Comment: Submission to WINE-2017 Deadline was August 2nd AoE, 201
The Price of Anarchy in Transportation Networks: Efficiency and Optimality Control
Uncoordinated individuals in human society pursuing their personally optimal
strategies do not always achieve the social optimum, the most beneficial state
to the society as a whole. Instead, strategies form Nash equilibria which are
often socially suboptimal. Society, therefore, has to pay a price of anarchy
for the lack of coordination among its members. Here we assess this price of
anarchy by analyzing the travel times in road networks of several major cities.
Our simulation shows that uncoordinated drivers possibly waste a considerable
amount of their travel time. Counterintuitively,simply blocking certain streets
can partially improve the traffic conditions. We analyze various complex
networks and discuss the possibility of similar paradoxes in physics.Comment: major revisions with multicommodity; Phys. Rev. Lett., accepte
- …