The Consistency dimension and distribution-dependent learning from queries

We prove a new combinatorial characterization of polynomial learnability from equivalence queries, and state some of its consequences relating the learnability of a class with the learnability via equivalence and membership queries of its subclasses obtained by restricting the instance space. Then we propose and study two models of query learning in which there is a probability distribution on the instance space, both as an application of the tools developed from the combinatorial characterization and as models of independent interest.Postprint (published version

Counterexample-Guided Data Augmentation

We present a novel framework for augmenting data sets for machine learning based on counterexamples. Counterexamples are misclassified examples that have important properties for retraining and improving the model. Key components of our framework include a counterexample generator, which produces data items that are misclassified by the model and error tables, a novel data structure that stores information pertaining to misclassifications. Error tables can be used to explain the model's vulnerabilities and are used to efficiently generate counterexamples for augmentation. We show the efficacy of the proposed framework by comparing it to classical augmentation techniques on a case study of object detection in autonomous driving based on deep neural networks

The LU-LC conjecture is false

The LU-LC conjecture is an important open problem concerning the structure of entanglement of states described in the stabilizer formalism. It states that two local unitary equivalent stabilizer states are also local Clifford equivalent. If this conjecture were true, the local equivalence of stabilizer states would be extremely easy to characterize. Unfortunately, however, based on the recent progress made by Gross and Van den Nest, we find that the conjecture is false.Comment: Added a new part explaining how the counterexamples are foun

On The Positive Definiteness of Polarity Coincidence Correlation Coefficient Matrix

Polarity coincidence correlator (PCC), when used to estimate the covariance matrix on an element-by-element basis, may not yield a positive semi-definite (PSD) estimate. Devlin et al. [1], claimed that element-wise PCC is not guaranteed to be PSD in dimensions p>3 for real signals. However, no justification or proof was available on this issue. In this letter, it is proved that for real signals with p<=3 and for complex signals with p<=2, a PSD estimate is guaranteed. Counterexamples are presented for higher dimensions which yield invalid covariance estimates.Comment: IEEE Signal Processing Letters, Volume 15, pp. 73-76, 200