1,424 research outputs found

    Query Order and the Polynomial Hierarchy

    Full text link
    Hemaspaandra, Hempel, and Wechsung [cs.CC/9909020] initiated the field of query order, which studies the ways in which computational power is affected by the order in which information sources are accessed. The present paper studies, for the first time, query order as it applies to the levels of the polynomial hierarchy. We prove that the levels of the polynomial hierarchy are order-oblivious. Yet, we also show that these ordered query classes form new levels in the polynomial hierarchy unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses. We prove that all leaf language classes - and thus essentially all standard complexity classes - inherit all order-obliviousness results that hold for P.Comment: 14 page

    What's Up with Downward Collapse: Using the Easy-Hard Technique to Link Boolean and Polynomial Hierarchy Collapses

    Full text link
    During the past decade, nine papers have obtained increasingly strong consequences from the assumption that boolean or bounded-query hierarchies collapse. The final four papers of this nine-paper progression actually achieve downward collapse---that is, they show that high-level collapses induce collapses at (what beforehand were thought to be) lower complexity levels. For example, for each k2k\geq 2 it is now known that if \psigkone=\psigktwo then \ph=\sigmak. This article surveys the history, the results, and the technique---the so-called easy-hard method---of these nine papers.Comment: 37 pages. an extended abstract appeared in SIGACT News, 29, 10-22, 199

    Downward Collapse from a Weaker Hypothesis

    Full text link
    Hemaspaandra et al. proved that, for m>0m > 0 and 0<i<k10 < i < k - 1: if \Sigma_i^p \BoldfaceDelta DIFF_m(\Sigma_k^p) is closed under complementation, then DIFFm(Σkp)=coDIFFm(Σkp)DIFF_m(\Sigma_k^p) = coDIFF_m(\Sigma_k^p). This sharply asymmetric result fails to apply to the case in which the hypothesis is weakened by allowing the Σip\Sigma_i^p to be replaced by any class in its difference hierarchy. We so extend the result by proving that, for s,m>0s,m > 0 and 0<i<k10 < i < k - 1: if DIFF_s(\Sigma_i^p) \BoldfaceDelta DIFF_m(\Sigma_k^p) is closed under complementation, then DIFFm(Σkp)=coDIFFm(Σkp)DIFF_m(\Sigma_k^p) = coDIFF_m(\Sigma_k^p)

    A Tight Karp-Lipton Collapse Result in Bounded Arithmetic

    Get PDF
    Cook and Krajíček [9] have obtained the following Karp-Lipton result in bounded arithmetic: if the theory proves , then collapses to , and this collapse is provable in . Here we show the converse implication, thus answering an open question from [9]. We obtain this result by formalizing in a hard/easy argument of Buhrman, Chang, and Fortnow [3]. In addition, we continue the investigation of propositional proof systems using advice, initiated by Cook and Krajíček [9]. In particular, we obtain several optimal and even p-optimal proof systems using advice. We further show that these p-optimal systems are equivalent to natural extensions of Frege systems

    Quantum Bounded Query Complexity

    Get PDF
    We combine the classical notions and techniques for bounded query classes with those developed in quantum computing. We give strong evidence that quantum queries to an oracle in the class NP does indeed reduce the query complexity of decision problems. Under traditional complexity assumptions, we obtain an exponential speedup between the quantum and the classical query complexity of function classes. For decision problems and function classes we obtain the following results: o P_||^NP[2k] is included in EQP_||^NP[k] o P_||^NP[2^(k+1)-2] is included in EQP^NP[k] o FP_||^NP[2^(k+1)-2] is included in FEQP^NP[2k] o FP_||^NP is included in FEQP^NP[O(log n)] For sets A that are many-one complete for PSPACE or EXP we show that FP^A is included in FEQP^A[1]. Sets A that are many-one complete for PP have the property that FP_||^A is included in FEQP^A[1]. In general we prove that for any set A there is a set X such that FP^A is included in FEQP^X[1], establishing that no set is superterse in the quantum setting.Comment: 11 pages LaTeX2e, no figures, accepted for CoCo'9
    corecore