181 research outputs found

    Genetic and morphological variation and differentiation of South Korean natural populations of wild soybean, Glycine soja Sieb and Zucc

    Get PDF
    Genetic variation is the basis of crop improvement. As genetic background narrows in the cultivated germplasm, genes need to be introduced from new sources. Glycine soja is a wild relative of the cultivated soybean, glycine max (L.) Merr. It can be used in soybean breeding. Evaluation of wild soybean populations is not only necessary for use in cultivar improvement, will also provide information about origin, migration, evolution and natural selection of this species. Seeds were collected from six natural populations in South Korea to study the genetic variation and differentiation of wild soybean. The study was divided into two parts: (a) lab assay for 17 isozymes and one protein involving 35 loci; and (b) two-year greenhouse experiment, during which data for morphological traits were recorded. The average number of alleles per locus, 99% polymorphism and the expected heterozygosity in the total population were 2.1, 77.1% and 0.215, respectively. Nei\u27s gene differentiation (G\sb{\rm ST}) was 0.383. The average Nei\u27s genetic distance was 0.117. Populations were not significantly different in mean CV (coefficients of variation) for both years. However, 27 of the 33 individual morphological traits examined in 1989 and 31 of the 39 in 1990 differed significantly among populations. The average among-population variation per trait per degree of freedom was 84.38% in 1989 and 83.11% in 1990. Although there were no significant differences among populations in mean CV, those populations with high genetic variation also had high mean CV for morphological traits. There was no congruence between the isozyme and morphological data in terms of population relationships. Multilocus association analysis provided significant insight into the genetic structure of these natural populations. The analysis indicated that within each population, there were two to three dominant multilocus genotypes. The multilocus genotypes were biotypes at the morphological level. These different types might be the basic genetic division of mosaic self-pollinated plant populations, and the basic units in natural selection and evolution. The analysis also suggested that there was no migration among these six populations in recent history. The numbers of loci different between individuals were used as measures of genetic variation and genetic distance

    Divergent northern and southern populations and demographic history of the pearl oyster in the western Pacific revealed with genomic SNPs

    Get PDF
    In the open ocean without terrain boundaries, marine invertebrates with pelagic larvae can migrate long distances using ocean currents, suggesting reduced genetic diversification. Contrary to this assumption, however, genetic differentiation is often observed in marine invertebrates. In the present study, we sought to explain how population structure is established in the western Pacific Ocean, where the strong Kuroshio Current maintains high levels of gene flow from south to north, presumably promoting genetic homogeneity. We determined the population structure of the pearl oyster, Pinctada fucata, in the Indo-Pacific Ocean using genome-wide genotyping data from multiple sampling localities. Cluster analysis showed that the western Pacific population is distinct from that of the Indian Ocean, and that it is divided into northern (Japanese mainland) and southern (Nansei Islands, China, and Cambodia) populations. Genetic differentiation of P. fucata can be explained by geographic barriers in the Indian Ocean and a local lagoon, and by environmental gradients of sea surface temperature (SST) and oxygen concentration in the western Pacific. A genome scan showed evidence of adaptive evolution in genomic loci, possibly associated with changes in environmental factors, including SST and oxygen concentration. Furthermore, Bayesian simulation demonstrated that the past population expansion and division are congruent with ocean warming after the last glacial period. It is highly likely that the environmental gradient forms a genetic barrier that diversifies P. fucata populations in the western Pacific. This hypothesis helps to explain genetic differentiation and possible speciation of marine invertebrates

    ์ดˆ์‹ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์Šค์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ฅ๋ฐฉ์šธ๋ฉ๊ตด์˜ ์ƒํƒœํ•™์ ยท๋ถ„์ž์ƒ๋ฌผํ•™์  ๋ฐ˜์‘

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์‚ฌ๋ฒ”๋Œ€ํ•™ ๊ณผํ•™๊ต์œก๊ณผ(์ƒ๋ฌผ์ „๊ณต), 2021. 2. ๊น€์žฌ๊ทผ.Aristolochia contorta (Aristolochiaceae) is herbal vine species, which has the distinctive secondary metabolites of family Aristolochiaceae and the specialist herbivore Sericinus montela (swallowtail butterfly). To enhance the sustainability of co-existence of A. contorta and S. montela, interaction between the two species should be studied. To assess the response of A. contorta to the herbivory, I studied the ecological and molecular-biological aspects of A. contorta under the herbivory stress. First, I assessed genetic diversity of A. contorta populations to understand the long-term sustainability of A. contorta population. Genomic DNA samples of A. contorta leaf were used for analysis from four populations (CJ, GP, PT, and YJ) where the vigorous growth was observed in the South Korea. Intra-population genetic diversity and inter-population genetic distance were assessed using randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD). Overall intra-population genetic diversity was lower, compared to the other riparian plant species (h: 0.0607 ~ 0.1401; I: 0.0819 ~ 0.1759). Despite of the geographical distance, population GP showed the larger genetic distance from other populations. This result seemed to be caused by the fragmented habitat and lower sexual reproduction of A. controta. Secondly, I performed the mesocosm experiment to assess the phenotypic plasticity of A. contorta under the herbivory stress. Physical damage on the young leaf or mature leaf was applied to one-year-old A. contorta seedlings under two light availability conditions (daylight and shade condition). Light availability significantly affected the most of the morphological characteristics. Leaf damage seemed to induce the emergence of branch and new leaf. Biomass production also increased under leaf damage treatment. Compensatory growth effect of leaf, shoot, and biomass production seemed to be stronger when young leaves were damaged rather than mature leaves. The higher phenotypic plasticity to leaf damage was observed under the daylight treatment. These results indicate that A. contorta could show the vigorous growth under the moderate leaf damage stress with sufficient light. Subsequently, I tried to assess the transcriptomic response of the A. contorta under herbivory stress by de novo transcriptome assembly. Transcriptome of the A. contorta leaves under control, simple wounding (W+DW), and simulated herbivory with oral secretion of S. montela (W+OS) treatment were compared. In addition, systemic response was also assessed from the upper leaves (systemic leaf). Total 92,323 contigs were filtered, and 28,231 contigs could be annotated under Gene Ontology (GO) database. Over half of the total DEGs (1,875 of 3,177 contigs) differentially expressed only by W+OS treatment. Secondary cell wall seemed to be reinforced under both W+DW and W+OS treatments from the cell wall related terms and lignin biosynthesis pathway. Both W+DW and W+OS treatments seemed to trigger the reactive oxygen species (ROS), ethylene, and jasmonic acid related signaling pathway. Contigs which are predicted to be involved in general herbivory response such as polyphenol oxidase, chitinase, MYB transcription factors, and jasmonate O-methyltransferase were up-regulated under W+OS treatment. Biosynthesis of some secondary metabolites including alkaloids were predicted to be induced by herbivory, which could affect the generalist herbivores rather than the specialist herbivores. However, specific secondary metabolite biosynthesis of Aristolochia such as aristolochic acids seemed to be not induced by herbivory. This results suggest the major defense mechanism against specialist herbivore of basal angiosperms could be similar to the previously studied eudicots. From my study, A. contorta seemed to be able to co-exist with the specialist herbivore S. montela even under the herbivory stress with the compensatory growth and defense mechanism. On the other hand, genetic diversity of A. contorta population was relatively low. To enhance the sustainability of the co-existence of S. montela and A. contorta, proper environmental condition should be provided. Results from this study could contribute to the integrative understanding of plant response to herbivory as well as the conservation of plant-herbivore interaction.์ฅ๋ฐฉ์šธ๋ฉ๊ตด(Aristolochia contorta)์€ ์ฅ๋ฐฉ์šธ๋ฉ๊ตด๊ณผ(Aristolochiaceae)์— ์†ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฉ๊ตด์„ฑ ์ดˆ๋ณธ์‹๋ฌผ๋กœ, ์ฅ๋ฐฉ์šธ๋ฉ๊ตด๊ณผ ํŠน์œ ์˜ ์ด์ฐจ ๋Œ€์‚ฌ์‚ฐ๋ฌผ์„ ์ƒ์‚ฐํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์ฅ๋ฐฉ์šธ๋ฉ๊ตด์€ ๊ผฌ๋ฆฌ๋ช…์ฃผ๋‚˜๋น„(Sericinus montela)์˜ ์œ ์ผํ•œ ๊ธฐ์ฃผ์‹๋ฌผ์ด๋‹ค. ์ฅ๋ฐฉ์šธ๋ฉ๊ตด๊ณผ ๊ผฌ๋ฆฌ๋ช…์ฃผ๋‚˜๋น„์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์ดํ•ด๋Š” ๋‘ ์ข…์˜ ๊ณต์กด์˜ ์ง€์†๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์žˆ์–ด ๋ฐ˜๋“œ์‹œ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ดˆ์‹์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ฅ๋ฐฉ์šธ๋ฉ๊ตด์˜ ๋ฐ˜์‘์„ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ดˆ์‹ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์Šค ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ์ฅ๋ฐฉ์šธ๋ฉ๊ตด์˜ ๋ฐ˜์‘์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์ƒํƒœํ•™, ๋ถ„์ž์ƒ๋ฌผํ•™์  ํ˜„์ƒ์— ๊ด€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด์•˜๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ๋กœ, ์žฅ๊ธฐ์ ์ธ ์ฅ๋ฐฉ์šธ๋ฉ๊ตด ๊ฐœ์ฒด๊ตฐ์˜ ์ง€์† ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐœ์ฒด๊ตฐ์˜ ์œ ์ „์  ๋‹ค์–‘์„ฑ์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฅ๋ฐฉ์šธ๋ฉ๊ตด ์ƒ์œก์ด ํ™œ๋ฐœํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์•Œ๋ ค์ง„ ๊ตญ๋‚ด์˜ ๋„ค ๊ฐœ์ฒด๊ตฐ์—์„œ ์žŽ์„ ์ฑ„์ง‘ํ•˜์—ฌ ์œ ์ „์ฒด DNA๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ถœํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ถ„์„์— ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฐœ์ฒด๊ตฐ ๋‚ด ์œ ์ „์  ๋‹ค์–‘์„ฑ๊ณผ ๊ฐœ์ฒด๊ตฐ๊ฐ„ ์œ ์ „์  ๋‹ค์–‘์„ฑ์€ 5๊ฐœ ๋ฌด์ž‘์œ„ ํ”„๋ผ์ด๋จธ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ RAPD (randomly amplified polymorphic DNA) ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜๋ณ€ ๊ฒฝ๊ณ„์ข…์ž„์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ–ˆ์„ ๋•Œ, ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์Šต์ง€์‹๋ฌผ๋“ค์— ๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์œ ์ „์  ๋‹ค์–‘์„ฑ์ด ์ƒ๋Œ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚ฎ์€ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค (h: 0.0607 ~ 0.1401; I: 0.0819 ~ 0.1759). ๋˜ํ•œ ์ง€๋ฆฌ์  ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ์™€ ๋ฌด๊ด€ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ฐœ์ฒด๊ตฐ GP๋Š” ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ฐœ์ฒด๊ตฐ๋“ค๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์œ ์ „์  ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ํฐ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ฅ๋ฐฉ์šธ๋ฉ๊ตด์˜ ํŒŒํŽธํ™”๋œ ์„œ์‹์ง€ ๋ฒ”์œ„์™€ ๋‚ฎ์€ ์œ ์„ฑ์ƒ์‹ ๋น„์œจ์— ๊ธฐ์ธํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ๋กœ, ์ดˆ์‹ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์Šค์— ์˜ํ•œ ์ฅ๋ฐฉ์šธ๋ฉ๊ตด์˜ ํ‘œํ˜„ํ˜•์  ๊ฐ€์†Œ์„ฑ์„ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด๊ณ ์ž ๋ฉ”์กฐ์ฝ”์ฆ˜ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋น› ๊ฐ€์šฉ์„ฑ ์กฐ๊ฑด(์ผ๊ด‘ ์กฐ๊ฑด ๋ฐ ๊ทธ๋Š˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด) ํ•˜์—์„œ ์ƒ์œก ์ค‘์ธ ์ผ๋…„์ƒ ๊ฐœ์ฒด์˜ ์–ด๋ฆฐ ์žŽ ํ˜น์€ ์„ฑ์ˆ™ ์žŽ์„ ์†์ƒ์‹œํ‚จ ํ›„ ์ƒ์œก ๋ฐ˜์‘์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ƒ๋Œ€๊ด‘๋„๋Š” ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ํ˜•ํƒœ์  ํŠน์„ฑ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์ณค๋‹ค. ์žŽ ์†์ƒ์€ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ฐ€์ง€์™€ ์žŽ์˜ ์ƒ์„ฑ์„ ์œ ๋„ํ•˜๋Š” ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์žŽ ์†์ƒ์ด ์ผ์–ด๋‚œ ๊ฐœ์ฒด์—์„œ ์ƒ๋ฌผ๋Ÿ‰ ๋˜ํ•œ ๋†’์€ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์žŽ ์†์ƒ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋ณด์ƒ ์ƒ์žฅ์€ ์„ฑ์ˆ™ ์žŽ๋ณด๋‹ค ์–ด๋ฆฐ ์žŽ์„ ์†์ƒ์‹œ์ผฐ์„ ๋•Œ ๋” ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ํ‘œํ˜„ํ˜•์  ๊ฐ€์†Œ์„ฑ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ผ๊ด‘ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๋” ํฐ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ๋น›์ด ์ฃผ์–ด์กŒ์„ ๋•Œ ์ฅ๋ฐฉ์šธ๋ฉ๊ตด์€ ์ ์ • ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ์ดˆ์‹ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์Šค ํ•˜์—์„œ๋„ ํ™œ๋ฐœํ•œ ์ƒ์žฅ์„ ๋ณด์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ ์ฅ๋ฐฉ์šธ๋ฉ๊ตด์˜ ์ „์‚ฌ์ฒด์˜ de novo assembly๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ดˆ์‹ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์Šค ํ•˜์—์„œ ์œ ์ „์ž ๋ฐœํ˜„ ์–‘์ƒ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ, ๋‹จ์ˆœ ์žŽ ์†์ƒ(W+DW), ์†์ƒ ๋ถ€์œ„์— ๊ผฌ๋ฆฌ๋ช…์ฃผ๋‚˜๋น„ ์œ ์ถฉ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ• ๋ถ„๋น„๋ฌผ์„ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ•œ ๋ชจ์˜ ์ดˆ์‹(W+OS) ์„ธ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ์ฅ๋ฐฉ์šธ๋ฉ๊ตด ์žŽ์˜ ์ „์‚ฌ์ฒด ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ „์‹  ๋ฐ˜์‘(systemic response) ๋˜ํ•œ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด 3,177๊ฐœ DEG (differentially expressed genes) ์ค‘ ์ ˆ๋ฐ˜ ์ด์ƒ์ธ 1,875๊ฐœ DEG๊ฐ€ W+OS ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€ํ•ด์ง„ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ๋งŒ ๋‹ค๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ๋ฐœํ˜„๋˜๋Š” contig๋“ค์— ํ•ด๋‹นํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์„ธํฌ๋ฒฝ ํ˜น์€ ๋ฆฌ๊ทธ๋‹Œ ์ƒํ•ฉ์„ฑ ๊ด€๋ จ term๋“ค์˜ ๋ฐœํ˜„ ์–‘์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฏธ๋ฃจ์–ด ๋ณด์•„, ๋‘ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ์กฐ๊ฑด ๋ชจ๋‘์—์„œ ์„ธํฌ๋ฒฝ ๋ณด๊ฐ•์ด ์œ ๋„๋จ์„ ์œ ์ถ”ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋‘ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๋ชจ๋‘ ํ™œ์„ฑ์‚ฐ์†Œ์ข…(reactive oxygen species), ์—ํ‹ธ๋ Œ, ์ž์Šค๋ชฌ์‚ฐ ๋“ฑ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์ „๋‹ฌ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์„ฑํ™”์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ถ”์ •๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. W+OS ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์ดˆ์‹ ๋ฐ˜์‘์— ๊ด€์—ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์•Œ๋ ค์ง„ polypenol oxidase, chitinase, MYB transcription factors, jasmonate O-methyltransferase ๋“ฑ์˜ ๋ฐœํ˜„๋Ÿ‰์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ์•Œ์นผ๋กœ์ด๋“œ๊ณ„ ๋ฌผ์งˆ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ์ผ๋ถ€ ์ด์ฐจ ๋Œ€์‚ฌ์‚ฐ๋ฌผ๋“ค์˜ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ๋Ÿ‰์ด ์ดˆ์‹์— ์˜ํ•ด ์œ ๋„๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์˜€์œผ๋‚˜, ์•„๋ฆฌ์Šคํ†จ๋กœํฌ์‚ฐ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ Aristolochia์† ํŠน์ด์ ์ธ ์ด์ฐจ ๋Œ€์‚ฌ์‚ฐ๋ฌผ ๋ฐœํ˜„๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ์œ ์ „์ž ๋ฐœํ˜„์€ ์œ ๋„๋˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๊ธฐ์ € ์†์”จ์‹๋ฌผ์—์„œ ํŠน์ด์  ์ดˆ์‹๋™๋ฌผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ฐฉ์–ด๊ธฐ์ž‘์€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ๋ฐฉ์–ด๊ธฐ์ž‘์„ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ๋„๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์ถ”ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ, ์ฅ๋ฐฉ์šธ๋ฉ๊ตด์€ ํŠน์ด์  ์ดˆ์‹๋™๋ฌผ์ธ ๊ผฌ๋ฆฌ๋ช…์ฃผ๋‚˜๋น„์˜ ์ดˆ์‹์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ณด์ƒ ์ƒ์žฅ๊ณผ ๋ฐฉ์–ด ๊ธฐ์ž‘์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ณต์กดํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์•Œ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์‹๋ฌผ-๊ณค์ถฉ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ์˜ ๋ณด์ „๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์ ์ธ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•จ๊ณผ ๋”๋ถˆ์–ด ์ดˆ์‹์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹๋ฌผ์˜ ๋ฐ˜์‘์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋‹ค๊ฐ์  ์ดํ•ด์— ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค.Abstract i LIST OF FIGURES vii LIST OF TABLES x Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Study Background 1 1.1.1. Plant-herbivore interaction and herbivory 1 1.1.2. Plant population under herbivory stress 1 1.1.3. Plant defense to herbivory 2 1.1.4. Secondary metabolites of basal angiosperms 3 1.1.5. Aristolochia contorta and its specialist herbivore Sericinus montela 3 1.2. Purpose of Research 4 Chapter 2. An analysis of the genetic diversity of a riparian marginal species, Aristolochia contorta 5 2.1. Introduction 5 2.2. Methods 7 2.2.1. Study site 7 2.2.2. Analysis of genetic diversity 7 2.3. Results and Discussion 9 2.3.1. Intraspecific genetic diversity 9 2.3.2. Genetic distance among populations 11 2.3.3. Genetic diversity of A. contorta and implications to the conservation 12 2.4. Conclusion 14 Chapter 3. Different growth response to the leaf damage under different relative light intensity in herbal vine Aristolochia contorta 15 3.1. Introduction 15 3.2. Methods 17 3.2.1. Growth condition and treatment 17 3.2.2. Measurement of growth characteristics 19 3.2.3. Phenotypic plasticity 19 3.2.4. Statistical analysis 20 3.3. Results 20 3.3.1. Growth characteristics under different light condition and herbivory 20 3.3.2. Phenotypic plasticity against leaf damage under different light condition 26 3.4. Discussion 30 3.4.1. Shade tolerance of Aristolochia contorta 30 3.4.2. Daylight enhance the phenotypic plasticity against leaf damage 30 3.4.3. Possible response of Aristolochia contorta against herbivory 32 3.5. Conclusion 33 Chapter 4. De novo transcriptome assembly of Aristolochia contorta reveals the defense strategy against its specific herbivore, Sericinus montela 34 4.1. Introduction 34 4.2. Methods 37 4.2.1. Plant materials and treatment 37 4.2.2. mRNA library construction 39 4.2.3. De novo assembly and functional annotation 39 4.2.4. Differentially expressed gene analysis 40 4.2.5. Ordination of differentially expressed genes 40 4.2.6. Validation of gene expression 41 4.3. Results 43 4.3.1. Overview of the A. contorta transcriptome 43 4.3.2. Gene expression among experimental conditions 44 4.3.3. Gene Ontology enrichment analysis 48 4.3.4. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis 56 4.3.5. Difference in the expression profile on the herbivory defense 61 4.3.6. Validation of gene expression by qRT-PCR 77 4.4. Discussion 83 4.4.1. Response to the special herbivory in the wounded leaf 83 4.4.2. Systemic response against special herbivory 86 4.4.3. Defense of the Aristolochia contorta against its specific herbivore 87 Chapter 5. General conclusion 93 Reference 95 Abstract in Korean 104 Appendix A. Detailed methods for RNA extraction of Aristolochia contorta 106 Appendix B. GO (gene ontology) barplot of enriched contigs under wounding or artificial herbivory treatment in A. contorta 108Docto

    Morphometric, genetic and reproductive characteristics of mud crabs (genus Scylla de Haan, 1833) from Southeast Asia

    Get PDF
    The edible mud crab, genus Scylla, is important to fisheries and aquaculture throughout the Indo Pacific region, but its taxonomic status has been confused for decades and a new classification has only recently been proposed. This project was undertaken to investigate the species status of mud crabs in Southeast Asia, with a view to deciding whether two sympatric morphs of Scylla found in Ban Don Bay, Surat Thani Province, Thailand, are two separate species. A further aim was to elucidate any possible pre-zygotic reproductive isolating mechanisms (RIMs) and ecological features that maintain the apparent sympatry between these two morphs. Mud crabs were collected from a primary site (Surat Thani, Thailand) as well as from six other locations in Thailand, Vietnam, Malaysia and Bangladesh. Crab samples from the latter sites were used selectively to provide a comparison to the primary study site. Descriptive taxonomy, multivariate morphometrics and allozyme electrophoresis were used to a) determine the number of species present within the crab samples collected; b) to ascertain which species they represent; c) to discover any geographical variation between locations sampled; d) to produce a possible phylogeny that summaries the relationship between Scylla species; and e) to look for pre-zygotic RIMs to explain the sympatry of the two morphs in Surat Thani. Findings from the present study reinforce the recent revision of the taxonomy of the genus Scylla into four species, S. serrata, S. olivacea, S. tranquebarica and S. paramamosain and provides new information on two of the four species which are dominant within Southeast Asia, including Ban Don Bay, Surat Thani Province, S. paramamosain and S. olivacea. Population studies showed both genetic and morphological differentiation between conspecific populations of S. paramamosain and S. olivacea, indicating stock structure for each species, although there is some disparity between morphological and genetic distances for S. paramamosain. This is discussed in relation to the effects of larval dispersal mechanisms and the subsequent recruitment of juvenile crabs. Phylogenetic interpretation of both genetic and morphological characters revealed that both S. serrata and S. olivacea are the most diverged of the four Scylla species; however, the direction of evolution is open to interpretation and the evidence for either S. olivacea or S. serrata as the more primitive species are discussed. Reproductive studies on the two mud crab species found in Surat Thani revealed no physical barrier to hybridization. Both species have a protracted breeding season which continues throughout the year. However, the size at first sexual maturity was significantly smaller for S. olivacea when compared to S. paramamosain. This and other potential mechanisms that may maintain these two species sympatrically are discussed. The clarification of four Scylla species, and the establishment of diagnostic genetic and morphological characters that can be used to identify them, means that research can now focus on both the ecology and life history of these closely related species. Such information is needed urgently with respect to fisheries management as well as to understanding the environmental requirements of each species in order to develop their potential for aquaculture
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore