71,109 research outputs found
Robust Decision Trees Against Adversarial Examples
Although adversarial examples and model robustness have been extensively
studied in the context of linear models and neural networks, research on this
issue in tree-based models and how to make tree-based models robust against
adversarial examples is still limited. In this paper, we show that tree based
models are also vulnerable to adversarial examples and develop a novel
algorithm to learn robust trees. At its core, our method aims to optimize the
performance under the worst-case perturbation of input features, which leads to
a max-min saddle point problem. Incorporating this saddle point objective into
the decision tree building procedure is non-trivial due to the discrete nature
of trees --- a naive approach to finding the best split according to this
saddle point objective will take exponential time. To make our approach
practical and scalable, we propose efficient tree building algorithms by
approximating the inner minimizer in this saddle point problem, and present
efficient implementations for classical information gain based trees as well as
state-of-the-art tree boosting models such as XGBoost. Experimental results on
real world datasets demonstrate that the proposed algorithms can substantially
improve the robustness of tree-based models against adversarial examples
Generating Compact Tree Ensembles via Annealing
Tree ensembles are flexible predictive models that can capture relevant
variables and to some extent their interactions in a compact and interpretable
manner. Most algorithms for obtaining tree ensembles are based on versions of
boosting or Random Forest. Previous work showed that boosting algorithms
exhibit a cyclic behavior of selecting the same tree again and again due to the
way the loss is optimized. At the same time, Random Forest is not based on loss
optimization and obtains a more complex and less interpretable model. In this
paper we present a novel method for obtaining compact tree ensembles by growing
a large pool of trees in parallel with many independent boosting threads and
then selecting a small subset and updating their leaf weights by loss
optimization. We allow for the trees in the initial pool to have different
depths which further helps with generalization. Experiments on real datasets
show that the obtained model has usually a smaller loss than boosting, which is
also reflected in a lower misclassification error on the test set.Comment: Comparison with Random Forest included in the results sectio
Vote-boosting ensembles
Vote-boosting is a sequential ensemble learning method in which the
individual classifiers are built on different weighted versions of the training
data. To build a new classifier, the weight of each training instance is
determined in terms of the degree of disagreement among the current ensemble
predictions for that instance. For low class-label noise levels, especially
when simple base learners are used, emphasis should be made on instances for
which the disagreement rate is high. When more flexible classifiers are used
and as the noise level increases, the emphasis on these uncertain instances
should be reduced. In fact, at sufficiently high levels of class-label noise,
the focus should be on instances on which the ensemble classifiers agree. The
optimal type of emphasis can be automatically determined using
cross-validation. An extensive empirical analysis using the beta distribution
as emphasis function illustrates that vote-boosting is an effective method to
generate ensembles that are both accurate and robust
Asymmetric Totally-corrective Boosting for Real-time Object Detection
Real-time object detection is one of the core problems in computer vision.
The cascade boosting framework proposed by Viola and Jones has become the
standard for this problem. In this framework, the learning goal for each node
is asymmetric, which is required to achieve a high detection rate and a
moderate false positive rate. We develop new boosting algorithms to address
this asymmetric learning problem. We show that our methods explicitly optimize
asymmetric loss objectives in a totally corrective fashion. The methods are
totally corrective in the sense that the coefficients of all selected weak
classifiers are updated at each iteration. In contract, conventional boosting
like AdaBoost is stage-wise in that only the current weak classifier's
coefficient is updated. At the heart of the totally corrective boosting is the
column generation technique. Experiments on face detection show that our
methods outperform the state-of-the-art asymmetric boosting methods.Comment: 14 pages, published in Asian Conf. Computer Vision 201
- …