1,720 research outputs found
The Length of Subset Reachability in Nondeterministic Automata
We study subset reachability in nondeterministic finite automata and look for bounds of the length of the shortest reaching words for automata with a fixed number of states. We obtain such bounds for nondeterministic automata over 2-letter, 3-letter and arbitrary alphabets. © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved
The Length of Subset Reachability in Nondeterministic Automata
We study subset reachability in nondeterministic finite automata and look for bounds of the length of the shortest reaching words for automata with a fixed number of states. We obtain such bounds for nondeterministic automata over 2-letter, 3-letter and arbitrary alphabets. © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved
Completeness Results for Parameterized Space Classes
The parameterized complexity of a problem is considered "settled" once it has
been shown to lie in FPT or to be complete for a class in the W-hierarchy or a
similar parameterized hierarchy. Several natural parameterized problems have,
however, resisted such a classification. At least in some cases, the reason is
that upper and lower bounds for their parameterized space complexity have
recently been obtained that rule out completeness results for parameterized
time classes. In this paper, we make progress in this direction by proving that
the associative generability problem and the longest common subsequence problem
are complete for parameterized space classes. These classes are defined in
terms of different forms of bounded nondeterminism and in terms of simultaneous
time--space bounds. As a technical tool we introduce a "union operation" that
translates between problems complete for classical complexity classes and for
W-classes.Comment: IPEC 201
Reachability in Higher-Order-Counters
Higher-order counter automata (\HOCS) can be either seen as a restriction of
higher-order pushdown automata (\HOPS) to a unary stack alphabet, or as an
extension of counter automata to higher levels. We distinguish two principal
kinds of \HOCS: those that can test whether the topmost counter value is zero
and those which cannot.
We show that control-state reachability for level \HOCS with -test is
complete for \mbox{}-fold exponential space; leaving out the -test
leads to completeness for \mbox{}-fold exponential time. Restricting
\HOCS (without -test) to level , we prove that global (forward or
backward) reachability analysis is \PTIME-complete. This enhances the known
result for pushdown systems which are subsumed by level \HOCS without
-test.
We transfer our results to the formal language setting. Assuming that \PTIME
\subsetneq \PSPACE \subsetneq \mathbf{EXPTIME}, we apply proof ideas of
Engelfriet and conclude that the hierarchies of languages of \HOPS and of \HOCS
form strictly interleaving hierarchies. Interestingly, Engelfriet's
constructions also allow to conclude immediately that the hierarchy of
collapsible pushdown languages is strict level-by-level due to the existing
complexity results for reachability on collapsible pushdown graphs. This
answers an open question independently asked by Parys and by Kobayashi.Comment: Version with Full Proofs of a paper that appears at MFCS 201
Lazy Probabilistic Model Checking without Determinisation
The bottleneck in the quantitative analysis of Markov chains and Markov
decision processes against specifications given in LTL or as some form of
nondeterministic B\"uchi automata is the inclusion of a determinisation step of
the automaton under consideration. In this paper, we show that full
determinisation can be avoided: subset and breakpoint constructions suffice. We
have implemented our approach---both explicit and symbolic versions---in a
prototype tool. Our experiments show that our prototype can compete with mature
tools like PRISM.Comment: 38 pages. Updated version for introducing the following changes: -
general improvement on paper presentation; - extension of the approach to
avoid full determinisation; - added proofs for such an extension; - added
case studies; - updated old case studies to reflect the added extensio
The Planning Spectrum - One, Two, Three, Infinity
Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) is widely used for defining conditions on the
execution paths of dynamic systems. In the case of dynamic systems that allow
for nondeterministic evolutions, one has to specify, along with an LTL formula
f, which are the paths that are required to satisfy the formula. Two extreme
cases are the universal interpretation A.f, which requires that the formula be
satisfied for all execution paths, and the existential interpretation E.f,
which requires that the formula be satisfied for some execution path.
When LTL is applied to the definition of goals in planning problems on
nondeterministic domains, these two extreme cases are too restrictive. It is
often impossible to develop plans that achieve the goal in all the
nondeterministic evolutions of a system, and it is too weak to require that the
goal is satisfied by some execution.
In this paper we explore alternative interpretations of an LTL formula that
are between these extreme cases. We define a new language that permits an
arbitrary combination of the A and E quantifiers, thus allowing, for instance,
to require that each finite execution can be extended to an execution
satisfying an LTL formula (AE.f), or that there is some finite execution whose
extensions all satisfy an LTL formula (EA.f). We show that only eight of these
combinations of path quantifiers are relevant, corresponding to an alternation
of the quantifiers of length one (A and E), two (AE and EA), three (AEA and
EAE), and infinity ((AE)* and (EA)*). We also present a planning algorithm for
the new language that is based on an automata-theoretic approach, and study its
complexity
Operations on Automata with All States Final
We study the complexity of basic regular operations on languages represented
by incomplete deterministic or nondeterministic automata, in which all states
are final. Such languages are known to be prefix-closed. We get tight bounds on
both incomplete and nondeterministic state complexity of complement,
intersection, union, concatenation, star, and reversal on prefix-closed
languages.Comment: In Proceedings AFL 2014, arXiv:1405.527
- …