Algebraic Models for Contextual Nets

We extend the algebraic approach of Meseguer and Montanari from ordinary place/transition Petri nets to contextual nets, covering both the collective and the individual token philosophy uniformly along the two interpretations of net behaviors

Two Algebraic Process Semantics for Contextual Nets

We show that the so-called 'Petri nets are monoids' approach initiated by Meseguer and Montanari can be extended from ordinary place/transition Petri nets to contextual nets by considering suitable non-free monoids of places. The algebraic characterizations of net concurrent computations we provide cover both the collective and the individual token philosophy, uniformly along the two interpretations, and coincide with the classical proposals for place/transition Petri nets in the absence of read-arcs

Functorial Semantics for Petri Nets under the Individual Token Philosophy

Although the algebraic semantics of place/transition Petri nets under the collective token philosophy has been fully explained in terms of (strictly) symmetric (strict) monoidal categories, the analogous construction under the individual token philosophy is not completely satisfactory because it lacks universality and also functoriality. We introduce the notion of pre-net to recover these aspects, obtaining a fully satisfactory categorical treatment centered on the notion of adjunction. This allows us to present a purely logical description of net behaviours under the individual token philosophy in terms of theories and theory morphisms in partial membership equational logic, yielding a complete match with the theory developed by the authors for the collective token view of net

A Comparison of Petri Net Semantics under the Collective Token Philosophy

In recent years, several semantics for place/transition Petri nets have been proposed that adopt the collective token philosophy. We investigate distinctions and similarities between three such models, namely configuration structures, concurrent transition systems, and (strictly) symmetric (strict) monoidal categories. We use the notion of adjunction to express each connection. We also present a purely logical description of the collective token interpretation of net behaviours in terms of theories and theory morphisms in partial membership equational logic

Causal Reversibility in Individual Token Interpretation of Petri Nets

Causal reversibility in concurrent systems means that events that the origin of other events can only be undone after undoing of its consequences. In opposite to backtracking, the events which are independent of each other can be reversed in an arbitrary order, in the other words, we have flexible reversibility w.r.t the causality relation. An implementation of Individual token interpretation ofPetri Nets (IPNs) was been proposed by Rob Van Glabbeek et al, the present paper investigates into a study of causal reversibility within IPNs. Given N be an IPN, by adding an intuitive firing rule to undo transitions according to the causality relation, the coherence of N is assured, i.e., the set of all reachable states of N in the reversible version and that of the original one are identical. Furthermore, reversibility in N is flexible and their initial state can be accessible in reverse from any state. In this paper an approach for controllingcausal-reversibility within IPNs is proposed

Formalization of Petri Nets with Individual Tokens as Basis for DPO Net Transformations

Reconfigurable place/transition systems are Petri nets with initial markings and a set of rules which allow the modification of the net structure during runtime. They have been successfully used in different areas like mobile ad-hoc networks. In most of these applications the modification of net markings during runtime is an important issue. This requires the analysis of the interaction between firing and rule-based modification. For place/transition systems this analysis has been started explicitly without using the general theory of M-adhesive transformation systems, because firing cannot be expressed by rule-based transformations for P/T systems in this framework. This problem is solved in this paper using the new approach of P/T nets with individual tokens. In our main results we show that on one hand this new approach allows to express firing by transformation via suitable transition rules. On the other hand transformations of P/T nets with individual tokens can be shown to be an instance ofM-adhesive transformation systems, such that several well-known results, like the local Church-Rosser theorem, can be applied. This avoids a separate conflict analysis of token firing and transformations. Moreover, we compare the behavior of P/T nets with individual tokens with that of classical P/T nets. Our new approach is also motivated and demonstrated by a network scenario modeling a distributed communication system

Decidability of Two Truly Concurrent Equivalences for Finite Bounded Petri Nets

We prove that (strong) fully-concurrent bisimilarity and causal-net bisimilarity are decidable for finite bounded Petri nets. The proofs are based on a generalization of the ordered marking proof technique that Vogler used to demonstrate that (strong) fully-concurrent bisimilarity (or, equivalently, historypreserving bisimilarity) is decidable on finite safe nets

Zero-safe net models for transactions in Linda

Abstract Zero-safe nets are a variation of Petri nets, where transactions can be suitably modeled. The idea is to distinguish between stable places (whose markings define observable states) and zero-safe places (where tokens can only be temporarily allocated, defining hidden states): Transactions must start and end in observable states. We propose an extension of the coordination language Linda, called TraLinda, where a few basic primitives for expressing transactions are introduced by means of different typing of tuples. By exploiting previous results of Busi, Gorrieri and Zavattaro on the net modeling of Linda-like languages, we define a concurrent operational semantics based on zero-safe nets for TraLinda, where the typing of tuples reflects evidently on the distinction between stable and zero-safe places