3,093 research outputs found
The Infimum Problem as a Generalization of the Inclusion Problem for Automata
This thesis is concerned with automata over infinite trees. They are given a labeled infinite tree and accept or reject this tree based on its labels. A generalization of these automata with binary decisions are weighted automata. They do not just decide 'yes' or 'no', but rather compute an arbitrary value from a given algebraic structure, e.g., a semiring or a lattice. When passing from unweighted to weighted formalisms, many problems can be translated accordingly. The purpose of this work is to determine the feasibility of solving the inclusion problem for automata on infinite trees and its generalization to weighted automata, the infimum aggregation problem
Weak MSO+U with Path Quantifiers over Infinite Trees
This paper shows that over infinite trees, satisfiability is decidable for
weak monadic second-order logic extended by the unbounding quantifier U and
quantification over infinite paths. The proof is by reduction to emptiness for
a certain automaton model, while emptiness for the automaton model is decided
using profinite trees.Comment: version of an ICALP 2014 paper with appendice
Comparator automata in quantitative verification
The notion of comparison between system runs is fundamental in formal
verification. This concept is implicitly present in the verification of
qualitative systems, and is more pronounced in the verification of quantitative
systems. In this work, we identify a novel mode of comparison in quantitative
systems: the online comparison of the aggregate values of two sequences of
quantitative weights. This notion is embodied by {\em comparator automata}
({\em comparators}, in short), a new class of automata that read two infinite
sequences of weights synchronously and relate their aggregate values.
We show that {aggregate functions} that can be represented with B\"uchi
automaton result in comparators that are finite-state and accept by the B\"uchi
condition as well. Such {\em -regular comparators} further lead to
generic algorithms for a number of well-studied problems, including the
quantitative inclusion and winning strategies in quantitative graph games with
incomplete information, as well as related non-decision problems, such as
obtaining a finite representation of all counterexamples in the quantitative
inclusion problem.
We study comparators for two aggregate functions: discounted-sum and
limit-average. We prove that the discounted-sum comparator is -regular
iff the discount-factor is an integer. Not every aggregate function, however,
has an -regular comparator. Specifically, we show that the language of
sequence-pairs for which limit-average aggregates exist is neither
-regular nor -context-free. Given this result, we introduce the
notion of {\em prefix-average} as a relaxation of limit-average aggregation,
and show that it admits -context-free comparators
Edit Distance for Pushdown Automata
The edit distance between two words is the minimal number of word
operations (letter insertions, deletions, and substitutions) necessary to
transform to . The edit distance generalizes to languages
, where the edit distance from to
is the minimal number such that for every word from
there exists a word in with edit distance at
most . We study the edit distance computation problem between pushdown
automata and their subclasses. The problem of computing edit distance to a
pushdown automaton is undecidable, and in practice, the interesting question is
to compute the edit distance from a pushdown automaton (the implementation, a
standard model for programs with recursion) to a regular language (the
specification). In this work, we present a complete picture of decidability and
complexity for the following problems: (1)~deciding whether, for a given
threshold , the edit distance from a pushdown automaton to a finite
automaton is at most , and (2)~deciding whether the edit distance from a
pushdown automaton to a finite automaton is finite.Comment: An extended version of a paper accepted to ICALP 2015 with the same
title. The paper has been accepted to the LMCS journa
Decidability Results for the Boundedness Problem
We prove decidability of the boundedness problem for monadic least
fixed-point recursion based on positive monadic second-order (MSO) formulae
over trees. Given an MSO-formula phi(X,x) that is positive in X, it is
decidable whether the fixed-point recursion based on phi is spurious over the
class of all trees in the sense that there is some uniform finite bound for the
number of iterations phi takes to reach its least fixed point, uniformly across
all trees. We also identify the exact complexity of this problem. The proof
uses automata-theoretic techniques. This key result extends, by means of
model-theoretic interpretations, to show decidability of the boundedness
problem for MSO and guarded second-order logic (GSO) over the classes of
structures of fixed finite tree-width. Further model-theoretic transfer
arguments allow us to derive major known decidability results for boundedness
for fragments of first-order logic as well as new ones
Complementation and Inclusion of Weighted Automata on Infinite Trees: Revised Version
Weighted automata can be seen as a natural generalization of finite state automata to more complex algebraic structures. The standard reasoning tasks for unweighted automata can also be generalized to the weighted setting. In this report we study the problems of intersection, complementation, and inclusion for weighted automata on infinite trees and show that they are not harder complexity-wise than reasoning with unweighted automata. We also present explicit methods for solving these problems optimally
- …