Comparison of the effectiveness of traditional nursing medication administration with the Color Coding Kids system in a sample of undergraduate nursing students

The problem of medication errors in hospitals and the vulnerability of pediatric patients to adverse drug events (ADE) was investigated and well substantiated. The estimated additional cost of inpatient care for ADE’s in the hospital setting alone was conservatively estimated at an annual rate per incident of 400,000 preventable events each incurring an extra cost of approximately $5,857. The purpose of the researcher was to compare the effectiveness of traditional nursing medication administration with the Color Coding Kids (CCK) system (developed by Broselow and Luten for standardizing dosages) to reduce pediatric medication errors. A simulated pediatric rapid response scenario was used in a randomized clinical study to measure the effects of the CCK system to the traditional method of treatment using last semester nursing students. Safe medication administration, workflow turnaround time and hand-off communication were variables studied. A multivariate analysis of variance was used to reveal a significant difference between the groups on safe medication administration. No significant difference between the groups on time and communication was found. The researcher provides substantial evidence that the CCK system of medication administration is a promising technological breakthrough in the prevention of pediatric medication errors

Provider issues related to patient controlled analgesia and nurse controlled analgesia errors in a pediatric hospital

Background: Medical errors are a danger to patient safety and a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Additionally, they increase expenditures in an already significantly indebted U.S. health care system. Much confusion exists about definitions of medical errors, which include medication errors and adverse drug events (ADEs). Several federal and international organizations have attempted to standardize definitions in order to streamline data collection, but until these standards are universally adopted, error reports and trends are still subject to questions of validity. Reporting errors, in general, has become a more socially acceptable practice in health care with the advent of several anonymous reporting databases. There have also been several initiatives aimed at reducing the incidence of errors, which range from national programs to intrafacility guidelines. Several pieces of health information technology (HIT) have made an impact on error incidence and data collection, although there is much room for improvement. Patient controlled analgesia (PCA) pumps for pain management have been in existence for decades, and "smart pump" software has improved their safety and ease of programming. PCA use in children presents challenges to clinicians, and the characteristics of providers who write PCA orders and those who program PCA pumps may play a role in the incidence of events related to PCA. This study seeks to elucidate trends in errors as they related to these different PCA providers in a pediatric hospital in the northeastern U.S. and provide recommendations for how PCA practice can be improved in this facility. Methods: Safety Event Reporting System (SERS) reports of PCA events (n = 117) during the period of 2004 - 2012 were analyzed retrospectively to determine several key variables for data analysis. The main focus of this analysis was those variable trends related to providers, including: proportion of events caused by human error, proportion of events related to subcategories of human error, proportion of types of prescribers involved in PCA events, proportion of errors in medical and surgical patients, proportion of errors occurring on day and night shifts for the nursing staff, and proportion of events that were dosing mistakes. Statistical analysis was performed for these results when possible to determine significance. Results: Human errors were implicated in 84.1% of events, whereas PCA pump mechanical errors and software errors were implicated in 7.1% and 7.9% of events, respectively. Statistically significant differences were found in all variables tested, including the proportion of nursing errors (60.9%) versus prescriber errors (28.7%) (p < 0.0002). For types of prescribers, the proportion of PCA events occurring when a M.D. wrote the PCA order (56.41%) was statistically different than when a N.P. wrote the PCA order (39.32%) (p = 0.0129). More surgical patients (61.5%) were affected by PCA events than medical patients (36.8%) (p < 0.0002). There were more events occurring on the nursing staff day shift (59.8%) than the night shift (36.8%) (p = 0.0004). Finally, dosing mistakes (66.7%) were implicated in significantly more PCA events than any other error type (33.3%) (p < 0.0002). Conclusion: Several recommendations for improving the safety of PCA in pediatric pain management are justified by the results of this data analysis. First, further education and simulation for entering PCA orders into the CPOE system is needed for all prescribers. Secondly, further education and simulation in PCA pump programming and system set-up is needed for all nursing staff members. In regard to prescriber credentials, it is recommended that Pain Treatment Service (PTS) staff members train M.D. residents in writing PCA orders and entering them into the CPOE system. Finally, it is recommended that the SERS management team publish standardized error report content and entry format in order to streamline data analysis for quality improvement (QI) purposes

2011 ADEA Annual Session: Poster Abstracts

Poster session abstracts from the 2011 American Dental Education Association (ADEA) Conference

Jefferson Digital Commons quarterly report: July-September 2018

This quarterly report includes: New Collection Alert Articles Code Red: Battling the Plague of Gun Violence Dissertations From the Archives Grand Rounds and Lectures House Staff Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Posters Journals and Newsletters Nexus Maximus Posters Third Annual Sepsis Symposium What People are Sayin

A Team-Based Approach to Studying Complex Healthcare Processes

Communication is a critical aspect of clinical work. In 2010, the Joint Commission (JC) found that gaps in communication were among leading factors contributing to medical errors. Healthcare processes, such as patient discharge, depend on interdisciplinary communication to be successful. Electronic health records (EHRs) have the potential to facilitate communication and information sharing between interdisciplinary care team members; however, challenges remain in designing tools for team-based care and questions remain in understanding how EHRs impact interdisciplinary team communication. This dissertation focuses on understanding how EHRs can be designed to support communication and information sharing within interdisciplinary patient care teams. The first aim of the dissertation investigated how EHRs impact interdisciplinary clinical teams’ communication, shared mental models, and information sharing activities. The results showed that implementing new EHR tools appeared to have little impact on communication and shared mental models, but new information sharing activities mediated by EHR developed. These changes and lack thereof suggest that new EHR tools will be specifically needed to facilitate interdisciplinary team information sharing activities. The second aim of the dissertation investigates the information sharing activities and information needs of interdisciplinary team members during patient discharge. The results showed that the information clinicians sought out during discharge depended on the roles that person played as well as the progress of the discharge process. Future EHR tools should be aware of how patient care teams are progressing through the patient discharge process in order to provide information contextualized to their current tasks. In conclusion, interdisciplinary team communication and information sharing remain poorly supported by current EHRs and new tools designed specifically for interdisciplinary teams should provide information based on the completion of team activities

Advances in Teaching & Learning Day Abstracts 2006

Proceedings of the Advances in Teaching & Learning Day Regional Conference held at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston in 2006

Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses

Compiles peer-reviewed research and literature reviews on issues regarding patient safety and quality of care, ranging from evidence-based practice, patient-centered care, and nurses' working conditions to critical opportunities and tools for improvement

The Effectiveness of Adult and Pediatric Code Blue Simulation-Based Team Trainings

The adult and pediatric healthcare providers at a New England medical center attended simulation training for responding to cardiac arrests that incorporated the current American Heart Association (AHA) evidence-based standards. The purpose of this concurrent mixed method program evaluation was to compare the adult code blue and pediatric team training programs to the AHA\u27s standards and identify if the staff learned the necessary skills to care for patients in cardiac arrest. The conceptual models used for the study were Crisis Resource Management and the transfer of learning model. The study sample was 660 adult and 269 pediatric healthcare providers who participated in both programs between 2012 and 2015. The research questions explored how the adult and pediatric programs compared, if they provided staff with necessary skills to care for cardiac arrests using current standards, and the staff perceptions of program effectiveness and barriers encountered. The data were collected using evaluation and observation forms and needs-assessment surveys. A chi square analysis identified differences between the programs on staff preparedness and transfer of knowledge into practice. The coding of the qualitative data identified themes from the participants\u27 perceptions on program design. Results prompted a program and curriculum redesign to include multiple opportunities to allow staff to learn and practice skills for low volume high acuity situations. The study promotes social change by giving healthcare providers opportunities to translate evidence-based training into clinical practice. The ability to function effectively as a team in a crisis improves patient outcome and potentially reduces mortality and morbidity within the institution and community. Simulation education also improves staff confidence in performance of low volume and high acuity situations