Typed Generic Traversal With Term Rewriting Strategies

A typed model of strategic term rewriting is developed. The key innovation is that generic traversal is covered. To this end, we define a typed rewriting calculus S'_{gamma}. The calculus employs a many-sorted type system extended by designated generic strategy types gamma. We consider two generic strategy types, namely the types of type-preserving and type-unifying strategies. S'_{gamma} offers traversal combinators to construct traversals or schemes thereof from many-sorted and generic strategies. The traversal combinators model different forms of one-step traversal, that is, they process the immediate subterms of a given term without anticipating any scheme of recursion into terms. To inhabit generic types, we need to add a fundamental combinator to lift a many-sorted strategy $s$ to a generic type gamma. This step is called strategy extension. The semantics of the corresponding combinator states that s is only applied if the type of the term at hand fits, otherwise the extended strategy fails. This approach dictates that the semantics of strategy application must be type-dependent to a certain extent. Typed strategic term rewriting with coverage of generic term traversal is a simple but expressive model of generic programming. It has applications in program transformation and program analysis.Comment: 85 pages, submitted for publication to the Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programmin

Process algebraic frameworks for the specification and analysis of cryptographic protocols

Two process algebraic approaches for the analysis of cryptographic protocols, namely the spi calculus by Abadi and Gordon and CryptoSPA by Focardi, Gorrieri and Martinelli, are surveyed and compared. We show that the two process algebras have comparable expressive power, by providing an encoding of the former into the latter. We also discuss the relationships among some security properties, i.e., authenticity and secrecy, that have different definitions in the two approaches

Process algebraic frameworks for the specification and ana lysis of cryptographic protocols

Two process algebraic approaches for the analysis of cryptographic protocols, namely the spi calculus by Abadi and Gordon and CryptoSPA by Focardi, Gorrieri and Martinelli, are surveyed and compared. We show that the two process algebras have comparable expressive power, by providing an encoding of the former into the latter. We also discuss the relationships among some security properties, i.e., authenticity and secrecy, that have different definitions in the two approaches

How unprovable is Rabin's decidability theorem?

We study the strength of set-theoretic axioms needed to prove Rabin's theorem on the decidability of the MSO theory of the infinite binary tree. We first show that the complementation theorem for tree automata, which forms the technical core of typical proofs of Rabin's theorem, is equivalent over the moderately strong second-order arithmetic theory $\mathsf{ACA}_0$ to a determinacy principle implied by the positional determinacy of all parity games and implying the determinacy of all Gale-Stewart games given by boolean combinations of ${\bf \Sigma^0_2}$ sets. It follows that complementation for tree automata is provable from $\Pi^1_3$- but not $\Delta^1_3$-comprehension. We then use results due to MedSalem-Tanaka, M\"ollerfeld and Heinatsch-M\"ollerfeld to prove that over $\Pi^1_2$-comprehension, the complementation theorem for tree automata, decidability of the MSO theory of the infinite binary tree, positional determinacy of parity games and determinacy of $\mathrm{Bool}({\bf \Sigma^0_2})$ Gale-Stewart games are all equivalent. Moreover, these statements are equivalent to the $\Pi^1_3$-reflection principle for $\Pi^1_2$-comprehension. It follows in particular that Rabin's decidability theorem is not provable in $\Delta^1_3$-comprehension.Comment: 21 page

Name-passing calculi: from fusions to preorders and types

This is the appendix of the paper "Name-passing calculi: from fusions to preorders and types" (D Hirschkoff, JM. Madiot, D. Sangiorgi), to appear in LICS'2013

Psi-calculi: a framework for mobile processes with nominal data and logic

The framework of psi-calculi extends the pi-calculus with nominal datatypes for data structures and for logical assertions and conditions. These can be transmitted between processes and their names can be statically scoped as in the standard pi-calculus. Psi-calculi can capture the same phenomena as other proposed extensions of the pi-calculus such as the applied pi-calculus, the spi-calculus, the fusion calculus, the concurrent constraint pi-calculus, and calculi with polyadic communication channels or pattern matching. Psi-calculi can be even more general, for example by allowing structured channels, higher-order formalisms such as the lambda calculus for data structures, and predicate logic for assertions. We provide ample comparisons to related calculi and discuss a few significant applications. Our labelled operational semantics and definition of bisimulation is straightforward, without a structural congruence. We establish minimal requirements on the nominal data and logic in order to prove general algebraic properties of psi-calculi, all of which have been checked in the interactive theorem prover Isabelle. Expressiveness of psi-calculi significantly exceeds that of other formalisms, while the purity of the semantics is on par with the original pi-calculus.Comment: 44 page