Binary Patterns in Binary Cube-Free Words: Avoidability and Growth

The avoidability of binary patterns by binary cube-free words is investigated and the exact bound between unavoidable and avoidable patterns is found. All avoidable patterns are shown to be D0L-avoidable. For avoidable patterns, the growth rates of the avoiding languages are studied. All such languages, except for the overlap-free language, are proved to have exponential growth. The exact growth rates of languages avoiding minimal avoidable patterns are approximated through computer-assisted upper bounds. Finally, a new example of a pattern-avoiding language of polynomial growth is given.Comment: 18 pages, 2 tables; submitted to RAIRO TIA (Special issue of Mons Days 2012

Avoidability index for binary patterns with reversal

For every pattern $p$ over the alphabet $\{x,y,x^R,y^R\}$, we specify the least $k$ such that $p$ is $k$-avoidable.Comment: 15 pages, 1 figur

Tower-type bounds for unavoidable patterns in words

A word $w$ is said to contain the pattern $P$ if there is a way to substitute a nonempty word for each letter in $P$ so that the resulting word is a subword of $w$. Bean, Ehrenfeucht and McNulty and, independently, Zimin characterised the patterns $P$ which are unavoidable, in the sense that any sufficiently long word over a fixed alphabet contains $P$. Zimin's characterisation says that a pattern is unavoidable if and only if it is contained in a Zimin word, where the Zimin words are defined by $Z_1 = x_1$ and $Z_n=Z_{n-1} x_n Z_{n-1}$. We study the quantitative aspects of this theorem, obtaining essentially tight tower-type bounds for the function $f(n,q)$, the least integer such that any word of length $f(n, q)$ over an alphabet of size $q$ contains $Z_n$. When $n = 3$, the first non-trivial case, we determine $f(n,q)$ up to a constant factor, showing that $f(3,q) = \Theta(2^q q!)$.Comment: 17 page

Counting Houses of Pareto Optimal Matchings in the House Allocation Problem

Let $A,B$ with $|A| = m$ and $|B| = n\ge m$ be two sets. We assume that every element $a\in A$ has a reference list over all elements from $B$. We call an injective mapping $\tau$ from $A$ to $B$ a matching. A blocking coalition of $\tau$ is a subset $A'$ of $A$ such that there exists a matching $\tau'$ that differs from $\tau$ only on elements of $A'$, and every element of $A'$ improves in $\tau'$, compared to $\tau$ according to its preference list. If there exists no blocking coalition, we call the matching $\tau$ an exchange stable matching (ESM). An element $b\in B$ is reachable if there exists an exchange stable matching using $b$. The set of all reachable elements is denoted by $E^*$. We show $$|E^*| \leq \sum_{i = 1,\ldots, m}{\left\lfloor\frac{m}{i}\right\rfloor} = \Theta(m\log m).$$ This is asymptotically tight. A set $E\subseteq B$ is reachable (respectively exactly reachable) if there exists an exchange stable matching $\tau$ whose image contains $E$ as a subset (respectively equals $E$). We give bounds for the number of exactly reachable sets. We find that our results hold in the more general setting of multi-matchings, when each element $a$ of $A$ is matched with $\ell_a$ elements of $B$ instead of just one. Further, we give complexity results and algorithms for corresponding algorithmic questions. Finally, we characterize unavoidable elements, i.e., elements of $B$ that are used by all ESM's. This yields efficient algorithms to determine all unavoidable elements.Comment: 24 pages 2 Figures revise

Avoiding Patterns in the Abelian Sense

We classify all 3 letter patterns that are avoidable in the abelian sense. A short list of four letter patterns for which abelian avoidance is undecided is given. Using a generalization of Zimin words we deduce some properties of ω-words avoiding these patterns.Research of both authors supported by NSERC Operating Grants.https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/canadian-journal-of-mathematics/article/avoiding-patterns-in-the-abelian-sense/42148B0781A38A6618A537AAD7D39B8